Risk Icon

As climate change continues to affect communities across Canada, its impacts on public infrastructure threaten the ability of local governments to deliver essential services effectively. Recognizing the need to act is the first step; however, it's often difficult to know where to begin. Planning your climate risk assessment and adaptation process helps create a clear path forward to protect your community from climate impacts.

 

This tip sheet will help you answer:  

  • What should I include in the scope for my climate risk assessment?
  • What information do I need and where can I find it?
  • How do I find the people with the right skills to take on this work?
  • What resources will help me do this work? 

Getting started 

Define the scope of your work.

How can you figure out the right scope for your climate risk assessment to make sure it fits your community's needs and addresses the most important areas? 

This involves tailoring your approach to your community’s unique context and priorities by outlining:

  • your community’s needs and objectives -> Why are you undertaking this climate risk assessment and adaptation planning work?
  • the climate hazards and scale of your work -> What will you be assessing and planning for?
  • the approach you will use to assess risks -> How will you go about it?

Here are some tips to help you get started. 

  1. Clarify your community’s need(s) and objective(s).

Climate risk assessments and adaptation plans are not one-size-fits-all. Clearly defining your community’s needs and objectives helps ensure a more focused, effective and well-supported process. 

Reflect on these questions Example responses 
Why are you undertaking the climate risk assessment and adaptation planning work? 
  • Our community is experiencing increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events.
  • We want to ensure the long-term sustainability of our local economy and natural resources.
  • We have to comply with regional, provincial/territorial and/or national climate policies and regulations. 
What objectives does your municipality aim to achieve by developing and implementing your adaptation plan?
  • We want to reduce the vulnerability of our community’s critical infrastructure (e.g., facilities, structures and assets critical to community function) to climate impacts.
  • We want to enhance public awareness and preparedness for climate-related risks.
  • We want to integrate climate resilience into all municipal planning and decision-making processes. 
What decisions do you want to inform? What outcomes are you seeking from this process?
  • We are aiming for improved community resilience to climate change.
  • We hope to identify capital projects or operational activities to manage climate impacts, so we can update our capital plan and financial plans.
  • We want increased collaboration and engagement with local stakeholders and residents on climate initiatives.
  • We plan to develop actionable strategies and projects that address identified climate risks.

 

  1. Identify what climate changes are affecting your community.

Are you aware of any climate changes that your community is facing now or that may be a concern in the future? These might include any of the following:

  • wildfire
  • extreme rainfall
  • extreme heat
  • extreme wind
  • drought
  • sea level rise and storm surge
  • permafrost degradation
  • erosion
  • other
  1. Choose the scale of the climate risk assessment.

In addition to identifying the climate hazards to include in your risk assessment and adaptation plan, the scale of your climate risk assessment refers to the extent of the physical boundaries, service areas and/or thematic considerations you will include. For example, you might set a:

  • physical boundary: This refers to the geographic area covered by the assessment, such as the municipal boundary or specific neighbourhoods within the municipality.
  • service boundary: This involves focusing on specific municipal services or departments, such as corporate services, culture and tourism, fire services or environmental services.
  • asset boundary: This involves focusing on specific physical assets within the municipality that are critical to its functioning.
  • hazard boundary: This means focusing on specific climate hazards that your community is currently or has experienced, such as wildfires or flooding.
  • thematic boundary: This refers to different themes or areas of focus, such as the environment, public health, infrastructure or the local economy.  

A community-wide assessment covering multiple areas, services, assets and themes provides the most comprehensive understanding of local climate risks. However, the scale of the risk assessment can vary between municipalities, depending on factors such as available resources, capacities, constraints and the purposes or goals of the risk assessment and adaptation plan. When choosing the scale for your climate risk assessment, consider:  

  • broader scale: For example, this would include all municipal assets and services as well as areas such as local economy and public health. A broader scale can provide a comprehensive understanding of the community-wide impacts of climate hazards, but it requires more effort and resources to go beyond a high-level scan.  
  • narrower scale: For example, this would include considerations only for a single asset or service area. A narrower scale can help you be more detailed but may miss broader climate vulnerabilities in your community.  
  • combination: For example, you could start with a high-level, community-wide assessment and follow with more detailed assessments for high-risk areas.

Further guidance on choosing the scale of your climate risk assessment can be found in:  

  1. Consider how you will define and measure the risks.

Your approach to the climate risk assessment should make sense for your municipality and the decisions you’re trying to inform. Consider whether you will take a top-down or bottom-up approach.

  • top-down: Should your assessment be led by a small group of experts or consultants who gather and analyze community data? This method is the quicker and less complex option but could miss valuable insights from diverse perspectives, increasing the risk of overlooking certain impacts or community needs.
  • bottom-up: Should you involve many people, including community members and stakeholders, in developing the assessment? This approach takes more time and effort but helps to gather diverse input and can build trust with community members and stakeholders who can help with implementation.

Does your municipality already have an approach to assessing risks? For example, has your community evaluated the risk of infrastructure failure through an asset management risk assessment? There may be opportunities to incorporate climate risks into your existing approaches. If not, there are many existing risk assessment frameworks and resources detailing the process. See Tip sheet: Start assessing your local climate risks for further details. 

 Gather relevant and trustworthy climate change information.  

This is about identifying and gathering the data you need to understand local climate change and its impacts on your community.  

When you’re new to the topic of climate change, how can you collect the information you need?  

Finding sources of information that are trustworthy and relevant to your community can be difficult, especially if staff have limited expertise related to the topic. Here are some tips to help you get started.

  1. Consider what types of information will be used in your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.

For guidance on selecting the types of information to include in your climate risk assessment and adaptation plan, refer to Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts.

  1. Take stock of what information you already have.

Not all climate information comes from resources specifically related to climate change. For example:  

  • Climate projects may already be identified in your asset management plan.
  • Most at-risk infrastructure may already be identified in your asset inventory.
  • Your municipality’s official plan may have insights into natural hazards.
  • Service requests can inform you about asset damage effects.

Neighbouring jurisdictions may have also already done climate work that you can draw on. For example, there may be a regional or district climate action plan other municipalities can pull from.

Additionally, climate information is not the only type that matters in a climate risk assessment and adaptation plan. For example, socioeconomic and organizational data are also important. You might find this useful information in community plans or initiatives. For example:

  • Your housing needs report may highlight vulnerable areas due to housing issues.
  • Insurers often have information on the impacts of damaging events.
  1. Identify credible sources of climate information.

Identifying credible sources of climate information involves considering who published it, when it was published and last updated, and where it is relevant.  

Who
  • reputable organizations: Look for data published by respected organizations. For example, the Climate Atlas of Canada is an interactive tool developed by the Prairie Climate Centre and designed to help you learn about climate change and explore its impact on communities.
  • academic institutions: Data from universities and research institutions is often peer-reviewed.
  • government agencies: Data from national, provincial and regional government agencies is credible. For example, ClimateData.ca is an online climate data portal developed by a group of government, academic and research organizations.  
  • local expertise: Rely on insights from local sources, including local and regional First Nations, Métis, Inuit and urban Indigenous Peoples communities and organizations, as well as other local jurisdictions, institutions, organizations, communities of practice and/or stakeholders.
  • transparency: Use sources that are open about their approach to collecting and analyzing data.
When
  • recent: Data should be current to reflect the latest observations and projections.
  • regular updates: Sources that are regularly updated remain relevant and accurate over time.
Where
  • geographic specificity: Ensure the data is specific to your location or region. Data that is too broad (e.g., national or international) may not accurately reflect local conditions and vulnerabilities.
  • localized studies: Look for sources that provide localized studies or allow you to set your location to access tailored data.  

 

For additional sources of regional climate data, refer to the “Library of climate resources” from the Canadian Centre for Climate Services. 

Bring together the needed knowledge, skills and experience.

This is about finding people within and outside your organization who can contribute to climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.  

When it seems like you need so many perspectives, how can you identify and bring together the right mix of skills, knowledge and experience to complete a climate risk assessment?

Here are some ideas on how to get started.

  1. Consider who might have the skills, knowledge, and experience you need.  

Start by finding those within your organization who have relevant skills, knowledge and experience. The GMF Guide: Municipal climate change staff has a comprehensive summary of departments or staff roles and the type of support or resources they might offer.  

You can also find valuable skills, knowledge and experience from those outside of your organization, such as:

  • qualified consultants for specialized skills
  • academic institutions for expertise and resources
  • community organizations (NGOs, community groups) for local climate information
  • government services like the Climate Help Desk from Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada

Identify which stakeholders will need to be involved and how you will involve them. In many cases, the success of your engagement will depend on established relationships, for example, with local and regional First Nations, Métis, Inuit and urban Indigenous Peoples communities and organizations.

Community members have valuable and unique expertise from their lived experiences of climate change. This includes youth, the elderly, people with disabilities, people of colour, Indigenous individuals and others. Listening to and amplifying their voices is a critical part of making your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning inclusive and representative of your community. Additional resources on undertaking engagement that is informed by Reconciliation and anti-racism, equity and inclusion are outlined in Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts and Tip sheet: Start climate adaptation planning.

  1. Build your climate adaptation team.

Once you have identified individuals within and outside your organization who can support your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning, it can be helpful to bring these people together as a team dedicated to climate adaptation efforts. For example, you can:  

  • Identify a team leader: choose someone to coordinate the team’s efforts and keep things organized.
  • Define a purpose: clearly outline what the team aims to achieve in your community.  
  • Schedule regular check-ins: set up regular meetings, even if they are informal, to discuss progress and next steps.  
  • Outline roles and responsibilities: make sure everyone knows their role in the team and what their responsibilities are.  

Additional resources on building your climate adaptation team can be found in the Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee’s (PIEVC) Large Portfolio Assessment Manual (LPAM) and High-Level Screening Guide (HLSG)

 

Next steps

Once you have prepared for your climate risk assessment and adaptation plan — with a clear scope, an understanding of the data you need and the skills in place to take it on — you will be in a good position to identify local climate impacts. For support on getting started on this next phase of work, read Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts.

Explore the Climate-Ready Communities Assessment Tool for additional insight and support in preparing for climate risk assessment and adaptation planning. You can use the tool to evaluate your existing climate adaptation efforts, pinpoint areas for improvement and chart a clear plan for strengthening your community’s adaptation efforts.

Note: Several of the approaches referenced in this tip sheet are from “Guidance on Good Practices in Climate Change Risk Assessment” (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2021).

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Featured Resources

Climate-Ready Communities Assessment Tool

Assess your community’s climate adaptation efforts and discover actionable steps to improve resilience

Read more

Course: Building climate resilience with asset management

How to protect municipal infrastructure from climate hazards

Read more

Factsheet: Why equity matters in municipal climate adaptation

Explore the importance of taking on equity-centred climate adaptation work

Read more

Please note: This webinar recording includes English captions only and does not contain English audio.

Urban forests are critical for a resilient, healthy and equitable community. Communities of all sizes can be the champions of change in urban forestry. Whether you are starting from scratch or reshaping existing plans, it is critical to learn what a robust urban forest management program entails and how this may vary depending on community size. 

Learn from a panel of experts in environment, forest and climate energy as they discuss what makes a robust urban forest management program and how to get started. From policies to protect existing trees to strategies for planting and growing new trees in areas that need them most, this webinar will provide practical insights on how small and large municipalities are advancing their urban forest priorities.

Speakers:  

  • Lauren Clark, Climate and Energy Program Manager, Town of Mahone Bay
  • Simon Wilmot, Forest and Environmental Officer, City of Charlottetown
  • Alexandre Fichon, Analyste en environnement, Ville de Longueuil

This webinar is well suited for:

  • Municipal elected officials
  • Urban forestry practitioners  
  • Parks and recreation staff
  • Planners
  • Asset management staff
  • Climate change / sustainability staff 

Watch the webinar


This webinar was created in partnership by Tree Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund for the Growing Canada’s Community Canopies initiative, which is delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and funded by the Government of Canada. 

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

 

Facing an affordable housing crisis and rising to the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Waterloo Region Housing (WRH) has undertaken its first net-zero community housing build. 

Located in Southern Ontario, WRH is expected to complete its newest community housing development at 420 Kingscourt Drive this summer. The project features a variety of energy-efficient design elements as well as tenant amenity spaces to foster a sense of community. The 73-unit building’s energy use will be 50 percent lower than average Canadian residential building, meaning tenants will not only enjoy an affordable, comfortable home, but also benefit from greatly reduced energy costs. 

The project is so exceptional that it was named a winner of a 2024 Sustainable Communities Award.

In this webinar recording, you’ll hear an inspiring story about how a local government with no previous experience constructing net-zero buildings ended up with an award-winning project that proudly incorporates affordability, energy efficiency and community engagement.

Watch the webinar recording to learn:

  • A detailed background behind WRH’s project and their goals and challenges, including a walkthrough of their approach, project scope and funding model.
  • The value of collaboration with other departments and obtaining council support.
  • The innovative pilot of the Community Benefits Program, which provides training to help recruit, engage and retain a diverse construction labour force.
  • Lessons learned from project and WRH’s next steps, including at least five additional affordable housing redevelopment projects in the area.

Speakers:

  • Tristan Wilkin – Supervisor of Affordable Housing Development, Housing Services; Region of Waterloo
  • Brad Pick – Senior Project Manager (Facilities-Large Capital); Region of Waterloo

This webinar was delivered in English with French simultaneous interpretation. 

FCM’s Sustainable Affordable Housing (SAH) initiative is delivered through our Green Municipal Fund and funded by the Government of Canada.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Please note that applications closed on October 17, 2025.

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$125,000

Grant up to 50%* of eligible costs

Open To:

The following organizations are eligible for GMF funding: 

  • Canadian municipal governments (e.g., towns, cities, regions, districts, and local boards)
  • Local government transit agencies
  • An Indigenous community is an eligible lead applicant if they are partnering with a Canadian municipal government on an eligible project, or if they have a shared service agreement with a Canadian municipal government related to municipal infrastructure, climate change or adaptation.
Expected Output:

New or improved active transportation infrastructure along school routes in your community, including quick-build or permanent features such as pathways, sidewalks, bike lanes, crossings and safety enhancements—along with knowledge and capacity to implement these improvements effectively. 

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT 

As a grant recipient, you’ll join a dynamic two-year journey designed to gain the skills, knowledge and connections to successfully plan and implement safe and active transportation projects in your community. You will receive expert training and connect with national leaders in active school travel to help drive lasting change. 

As part of the cohort, you’ll receive support to: 

  • strengthen community engagement with proven strategies to gain school and stakeholder buy-in
  • navigate challenges, policies and regulatory hurdles
  • sharpen your project planning skills, including funding, infrastructure and implementation
  • build collaborative relationships across sectors to support long-term success
  • learn to track progress and measure impact, including GHG reductions and long-term impacts.
Application Deadline:

The pre-application deadline is October 17, 2025. Please note that the application intake will begin mid-summer.

Eligible Costs:

See list of eligible costs

This funding is intended primarily to support the design and installation of active transportation infrastructure for safe routes to school. The majority of funding should be allocated to these costs. 

* The following applicants may qualify for a grant of up to 80 percent of eligible project costs: 

  • Municipalities (or their partners) with a population of 10,000 or under;
  • regional governments or groups of municipalities where the average population of the member municipalities is 10,000 or under;
  • eligible Indigenous communities; and,
  • northern communities

Northern and eligible Indigenous communities that are applying to GMF for the first time may qualify for a grant of up to 100 percent of eligible costs. 

The North is defined as the three territories and the northern extent of seven provinces. This includes portions of the following provinces defined by Statistics Canada codes: Newfoundland and Labrador (10), Québec (24), Ontario (35), Manitoba (46), Saskatchewan (47), Alberta (48) and British Columbia (59).

What we fund

We fund projects that aim to increase walking, biking and rolling to school through new or improved active transportation infrastructure and road safety improvements. Recipients will be supported during the planning, design and implementation stages through the peer-learning support program. Costs associated with all these projects stages are eligible for funding.

Projects must consist of a capital investment (i.e., constructing, altering or improving physical assets) and may additionally include policy measures (e.g., speed limit changes) and educational strategies. Policy measures and educational strategies alone are not eligible for funding. Eligible projects may include:  

  • Quick-build installations for active transportation, such as bollards, planters, paint, concrete surfboards and other removable treatments arranged to pilot new pathways, crosswalks, curb bump-outs, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, speed deterrents, etc.
  • New or improved infrastructure for active transportation, such as separated bicycle lanes, more pedestrian-friendly intersections, pathways, crosswalks and connections to active transportation networks and transit networks.
  • Improved active transportation infrastructure, including design considerations in which there may be no net gain in kilometres of infrastructure, but include improvements in the quality of infrastructure that encourage greater usage. 
  • New or improved design and safety features and facilities that promote active transportation, such as storage facilities, lighting, greenery, shade, benches, crosswalks, speed bumps, fences, signage and automated speed enforcement.   
PXL_2024073...4226623.jpg

Photo courtesy of Halifax Regional Municipality 

 

Safe activities

Photo courtesy of Halifax Regional Municipality 

Application requirements 

Applications must: 

  1. Identify one or more routes to a primary or secondary school (or schools) as the target area for the capital project and propose an infrastructure solution to address safety-related challenges that create a barrier to active school travel for children. Grant recipients will have an opportunity through the learning program to explore various infrastructure solutions and confirm or adjust their approach.
  2. Demonstrate that their project will enable a significant proportion of students to walk, bike or roll to/from key destinations within 2kms of the school (e.g. home, recreation centre, transit stops) by identifying the size of the school population and the percent of students impacted
  3. Provide proof of a partnership between the school(s) of interest (e.g., via school administration and/or school district) and the local government applicant that indicates a willingness to collaborate on the proposed project (e.g., through a letter of support).  
  4. Demonstrate they have complete jurisdiction over the roads, paths or land expected to be directly impacted by the project, or permission from an entity or person with jurisdiction or ownership to undertake the project.  
  5. Demonstrate that the proposed project is a municipal commitment or part of a municipal plan or strategy. For example, the project is identified in a municipal, transportation, school or active transportation plan, school travel plan and/or be identified in an approved or proposed council resolution (that will be considered by Council prior to the project start date). 
  6. Demonstrate that projects have the potential to lead to GHG reductions through a reduction in vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) by shifting trips to active transportation modes (walking and cycling) or other solutions that decrease vehicle use and GHGs. To help applicants set their VKT reduction targets, GMF will provide support during the application process, including guidance on estimating impacts. We recognize that available data may vary, so applicants can use a combination of the following sources. If data is incomplete, GMF can also provide default values to assist with estimates: 

    1. Usage data (e.g., school travel surveys, census data, traffic counts)
    2. Mode shift estimates (e.g., peer benchmarks, survey results) 
    3. Trip characteristics (e.g., average trip to school length) 

       

    All approved recipients will have a chance to refine their baseline data and set more accurate targets through a peer-learning program, where they will also receive guidance on monitoring and reporting project outcomes. 

What your project needs to achieve 

Only projects that meet the criteria on this page are eligible. Please note that we consider several factors in making a funding decision. We strive to fund the most innovative and impactful initiatives as well as support communities of all sizes, so not all eligible projects will be approved for funding. Applicants must commit to actively participating in the peer learning support program to be considered for funding.   

Preference will be given to initiatives that: 

  • will improve safety of active transportation users, with a focus on child and youth safety
  • are linked to a pre-established school travel plan
  • will connect to, or extend, existing active transportation networks or pathways
  • consider accessibility in the project design and implementation
  • are led by a multidisciplinary team, representing key roles (e.g., transportation, planning, recreation, climate, public health, parks, transit)
  • are conducted in collaboration with key implementation partners (e.g. parent-teacher associations, non-profit organizations and public health organizations active in safe routes to school)
  • are led by or created in collaboration with equity-deserving groups or with an Indigenous community
  • contribute to the testing or demonstration of treatments, approaches and practices that are innovative
  • youth and/or children contribute to, or lead, aspects of the project development and implementation (e.g. engagement, design, installation, monitoring and evaluation)
  • demonstrate a strong integration of multi-solving approaches such as:
    • maximizing environmental and socio-economic benefits (e.g., improved accessibility; use of recycled, natural or low-carbon materials; promoting green buffers or pollinator-friendly landscaping, promoting child-friendly neighbourhoods)
    • advancing Reconciliation, equity, diversity and inclusion by addressing transportation challenges for low-income or equity-deserving groups or low-income communities

Equity considerations 

GMF recognizes that many urgent social issues are interrelated, and that climate action and sustainability initiatives need to be designed to ensure fair distribution of benefits and burdens, across all segments of a community and across generations. Projects will be assessed on their potential to result in improved socio-economic outcomes and a more equitable distribution of benefits and burdens among the community, for present and future generations. While projects can be eligible without incorporating these considerations, preference is given to projects that:

  • integrate principles of Reconciliation, anti-racism, equity and inclusion
  • apply inclusive community engagement practices
  • implement social procurement practices, for example buying from local vendors, small businesses, diverse businesses or social enterprises.
  • generate other socio-economic benefits, such as improved accessibility, improved outdoor spaces and opportunities for inclusive employment and apprenticeship.

As you develop your project, consider the following questions:

  1. How can you design an engagement approach that would enable you to consider the diverse needs, experiences, and voices of all stakeholders and rights holders in this project?
  2. Which equity-deserving groups might benefit the most, and/or be burdened, directly or indirectly, by this project? How are these groups positively or negatively impacted?
  3. Are there opportunities to address or mitigate negative impacts?
  4. Are there opportunities to rectify existing or potential biases, discrimination, or exclusionary practices in your project planning, design, funding, and implementation?
  5. How can you maximize the socio-economic benefits that your project generates?
  6. How can you leverage your procurement practices to generate more positive social, economic and environmental outcomes within your community and region? 

 

Please note that applications closed on October 17, 2025.

 

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Read the guide for more information on creating a successful application.

Does your community want to enhance biodiversity and better manage its natural assets? This factsheet explores how thoughtful tree planting and urban forest management can restore and connect habitats to enhance urban biodiversity, ecosystem health and ecosystem structure. 

Biodiversity in the urban forest

Trees are critical for supporting biodiversity. Tree species like white oaks, hackberries and beaked hazelnut sustain local wildlife by producing acorns, berries and nuts that feed bird and mammal species. Other trees, like eastern white cedars or eastern redbud, provide shelter for birds or produce flowers that support native pollinators. Trees also support local watersheds by preventing erosion in ravines and along rivers and improving water quality.

While individual trees provide important benefits for wildlife, it is vital to maintain and protect patches of undisturbed forests and other areas with high tree density, particularly in urban and peri-urban environments (areas located on the outskirts of cities and towns). These patches are composed of mostly native trees and other vegetation that have co-evolved and formed symbiotic relationships with native wildlife. Conserving these spaces, along with planting new trees, helps to preserve important habitat and maintain native species populations. 

Threats to urban forests 

Many communities around the world have established themselves in areas with high biodiversity. However, as cities and towns expand and land is cleared to make room for development, existing ecosystems like wetlands, forest and grasslands can be significantly altered or replaced entirely.

Today, many urban ecosystems, including urban forests, have been degraded from the impacts of development. This shows up as habitat loss, invasive species, pollution and poor soil quality. A degraded ecosystem can lead to native plant species not regenerating as they should and wildlife populations declining.

Urban forests also suffer from fragmentation. Cities and towns often contain patches of forest and other ecosystems that are isolated from one another by human-made barriers like roads, commercial buildings and housing developments. These barriers prevent wildlife from crossing between different patches which, over time, can lead to a decline in biodiversity and lower wildlife populations.

Restoring habitat through tree planting and management

Ecosystem restoration is the process of returning a degraded or converted ecosystem to a healthy, functional and sustainable state (i.e., what existed prior to human intervention). This process includes activities such as removing invasive species, planting native vegetation, remediating soil and improving water quality.  

In urban and peri-urban areas, tree planting is a highly effective method for restoring habitats and conserving biodiversity. Planting trees helps re-establish canopy structures, supports wildlife, prevents invasive species and promotes native plant diversity. 

Case study: Restoring the Black Oak savannah in the City of Toronto

The Black Oak savannah is a rare and diverse grassland ecosystem in Ontario that relies on fire to thrive. Periodic controlled wildfires in these ecosystems benefit native plants and animals by reducing invasive species, stimulating native plant regeneration and restoring wildlife habitat. For centuries, Indigenous communities have managed the savannah through practices like traditional burns. However, urban development and colonial practices such as fire suppression have largely destroyed or vastly changed much of the Black Oak savannah from its original state.  

A large patch of Black Oak savannah still exists in several parks in the City of Toronto, including High Park. In 1995, the city determined that the trees in the park were nearing the end of their life expectancy and new trees were not regenerating to replace them. The ecosystem was not functioning optimally, and its long-term viability was at risk.  

The city has since begun restoration efforts by partnering with local Indigenous communities to conduct annual traditional and prescribed burns, targeted plantings of black oak, and careful monitoring and removal of invasive species. Over time, these actions have led to natural regeneration within the ecosystem, illustrating the value of planting and careful management in ecosystem restoration. 
Learn more about traditional and prescribed burns in the City of Toronto. 
 

Improving habitat connectivity in and out of the urban forest 

Habitat connectivity is the extent to which distinct patches of habitat are connected, which can influence how or if animals and plants can travel between different habitable areas. Increasing habitat connectivity in and around urban areas can help mitigate the effects of isolated patches and improve biodiversity.  

Efforts to promote biodiversity often concentrate on large natural habitats outside of urban environments. For example, the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative is a collaborative effort to protect and connect landscapes across more than a million square kilometres in the United States and Canada. These types of projects connect large swathes of habitat through land agreements and the establishment of corridors that allow wildlife to move safely across large tracts of land.

But smaller natural urban spaces and peri-urban spaces, like municipal parks and other greenspaces, can also support considerable biodiversity, promoting species and ecosystem diversity by reducing fragmentation. Trees planted on municipal streets and in parks can create green corridors that provide temporary food and shelter for birds and pollinator species searching for higher-quality habitat. Careful analysis and planning, including mapping existing greenspaces, is crucial to identify and prioritize sites that can enhance connectivity.

Case study: City of Surrey biodiversity strategy and green infrastructure network

The City of Surrey, BC, has taken significant steps to conserve biodiversity with a dedicated municipal strategy endorsed by its council in 2014. Surrey has integrated objectives from its biodiversity conservation strategy into its official community plan, climate change action strategy and urban forest management strategy, among others, and has developed a set of design guidelines to support neighbourhood-level approaches to increasing biodiversity. 

Part of this work involves the development of a green infrastructure network connecting 3,900 hectares of natural green corridors and greenspaces across the city. The network is based on three core principles:  

  • Preserve large core habitat areas, such as forest stands or parks (“hubs”).
  • Ensure connectivity between habitat areas (“corridors”).
  • Provide a diversity of habitat features throughout Surrey (“sites”).  

The city uses a combination of tools to protect public and private land, including development permit requirements, parkland dedications and land acquisition. 

Learn more about the City of Surrey’s biodiversity initiatives. 
 

Strategies for restoring urban forests and connecting habitats in your community 

Effective planning for biodiversity in and around municipalities is increasingly important as urban areas expand. Good planning can help achieve conservation goals and support the ecosystem functions and services on which our communities depend.

Municipalities can leverage various tools to protect and restore urban forests and to ensure habitat connectivity. Below are initial strategies that your municipality can explore to plant new trees and to manage existing treed spaces in a way that promotes biodiversity. 

  1. Identify and assess areas that need to be restored and connected

    Creating an inventory is an important first step to determine ideal locations for restoring and connecting habitat. Your inventory should include municipal parks and other public or privately-owned land that can support additional tree planting. Inventories can be created through a combination of on-the-ground searches, existing public park information, satellite imagery and community engagement. They can be stored and visualized using tools like geographic information system (GIS) software or iTree (for more details on these, review our factsheet on urban forestry technology and tools).

    After creating your inventory, analyze potential sites based on factors like proximity to an existing natural area, size of existing greenspace, existing biodiversity and presence of invasive or at-risk species. Biodiversity assessments can be performed on sites with existing natural greenspaces like woodlots or ravine areas by trained biologists, foresters or ecologists.  

    You can also use your inventory to determine opportunities to improve connectivity between existing greenspaces. The distance between two existing parks or greenspaces or the presence of existing green corridors (e.g., streets with continuous canopy or vegetation cover) nearby are measures that can help prioritize locations for connectivity.  

    Key resource: The San Francisco Estuary Institute’s Making Nature’s City Toolkit outlines possible assessment criteria for evaluating urban biodiversity. It includes information about the size, shape and distance between patches of greenspace, width of corridors, habitat diversity, presence of native vegetation and more. 

  2. Implement tree planting and other restoration projects

    After conducting your parks and plantable spaces inventory, you can begin plans to maintain or enhance biodiversity in your community. The outcomes of your inventory assessment will inform which sites you prioritize to plant new trees, create green corridors and otherwise support habitat restoration and connectivity.  

    Always seek expert advice when planning new projects. Your team should include experienced biologists, Knowledge Keepers, ecologists or foresters with ecosystem restoration and connectivity knowledge. Wherever possible, use native trees and vegetation to better support native pollinators and make sure to select species that can tolerate future climate conditions (e.g., drought-tolerant species or species not currently threatened by pests or diseases). When prioritizing sites, consider projects that would improve or create critical habitat for species at risk.  

    After restoration work is complete, it is important to have a long-term monitoring plan for the site. Invasive species are a constant threat to natural spaces and are easiest to remove when found early.  

    Consider how your community can be involved in data collection, monitoring and restoration efforts. Community members, naturalist groups and other local environmental organizations are often aware of natural spaces in need of restoration activities like tree planting or invasive species removal. Ensuring community members are aware of and able to participate in the planting and restoration projects can increase their impact and success. Involve local Indigenous communities by seeking guidance from Knowledge Keepers and prioritizing input from Indigenous leaders and community members during engagement.

    You can also plan events to encourage community members to record and share wildlife sightings in public databases. For example, municipalities and other community groups can participate in Nature Conservancy Canada’s annual Big Backyard BioBlitz

     

  3. Protect existing natural spaces through local policies and planning

    The easiest way to protect biodiversity in your community is to protect existing natural spaces. Restoring former natural areas is often more costly and work intensive than maintaining existing spaces. Municipalities can explore options to create protected areas on municipal land and partner with other landowners and/or orders of government to establish protections.

    To maintain your existing natural spaces, you can create a biodiversity strategy or plan. Municipal biodiversity strategies are comprehensive long-term plans to protect and enhance local natural spaces. They provide an outline your municipality can follow to increase biodiversity and stop important habitat loss.  

    Ensure municipal development plans and land use policies are prioritizing the protection and enhancement of local biodiversity. Consider the different tools at your disposal, such as zoning or development permit bylaws, that can be used to protect existing natural areas and enhance biodiversity. 

    Key resource: The Green Bylaws Toolkit is a comprehensive resource for land use planners and decision-makers that explains how to create bylaws and other policy tools that protect and enhance the natural environment and green infrastructure.  

Other municipal examples

  • The City of Nicolet, QC, collaborated with Habitat to assess ecological connectivity in the region and create an action plan for developing an ecological corridor. This included activities like tree planting and wetland preservation.  
  • The City of Victoria, BC, has listed improving ecological connectivity as a dedicated outcome in its urban forest master plan. Strategies include using tree planting and management to connect larger natural areas and provide corridors for wildlife.
  • The City of Edmonton, AB, uses an ecological network approach to conserve its natural areas. A natural connections strategic plan and a natural area systems policy outline specific principles, roles and responsibilities for implementation.
  • The City of Toronto, ON, released a biodiversity strategy to enhance the quality and quantity of biodiversity and increase awareness of nature in Toronto. This has included numerous restoration projects and public engagement initiatives, such as biodiversity booklets for different groups of species (e.g., Trees, Shrubs and Vines of Toronto). 

Next steps


This resource was created in partnership by Tree Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund for the Growing Canada’s Community Canopies initiative, which is delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and funded by the Government of Canada.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

About this guide

The Integrating Equity Principles Within Community Efficiency Financing Programs: A Guide for Canadian Municipalities and Partners is designed to help municipalities create home energy retrofit financing programs that work for everyone. Developed as part of the Green Municipal Fund's (GMF) Community Efficiency Financing (CEF) initiative, this guide provides practical tools and strategies to make energy efficiency programs more accessible, fair and impactful.

Why inclusion matters

Energy efficiency programs have the power to reduce energy costs, improve home comfort and cut greenhouse gas emissions. Yet not everyone has been able to access these benefits. Barriers like upfront costs, language differences and a lack of awareness often exclude those who need these programs the most.

This guide is built on the principle that fairness doesn’t mean treating everyone the same—it means recognizing people’s unique starting points and equipping them with the tools they need to succeed. By adopting this approach, municipalities can create programs that:

  • Help more households participate in energy retrofits
  • Reduce energy costs for those who need it most
  • Build healthier, more resilient communities

By addressing these challenges and designing inclusive programs, municipalities can ensure energy efficiency benefits reach everyone in their communities.

What you’ll find in the guide

  • Clear steps to success: Learn how to incorporate inclusive practices at every stage of your program, from planning to evaluation.
  • Tools to remove barriers: Explore ways to make your programs more accessible, whether by reducing financial risks, tailoring outreach efforts, or offering targeted supports.
  • Real-life examples: See how other municipalities, like Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, are leading the way with programs that prioritize community needs and deliver real results.

Who is this guide for?

This guide is for municipalities, local governments and their partners involved in home energy retrofit financing. Whether you’re just starting out or refining your approach, this resource will help you design programs that create meaningful change and reach more people.

Get started

Making your energy retrofit program more inclusive doesn’t require overhauling everything at once. This guide offers practical actions you can take, no matter where your community is on its journey. Even small steps can make a big difference.

Download the guide.
 

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Every five years, FCM engages a third-party to conduct both a Review and a Performance Audit of the Green Municipal Fund (GMF). This assessment covers the work occurring April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024. Ernst & Young conducted the work and provided the two final reports in January 2025.

FCM is pleased with the results of the Five-Year Review and the Five-Year Performance Audit and is in agreement with Ernst & Young’s findings and recommendations. These recommendations will help guide further improvements to the delivery and continued relevance of our GMF programming to stakeholders. 

Read the review results

Read the performance audit results

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Pagination

Subscribe to