Please note that applications closed on June 26, 2026

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$100,000

Grant up to 50%* of eligible costs

*Exceptions: Up to 80% of eligible costs for rural, Northern and eligible Indigenous communities; and up to 100% for Northern and eligible Indigenous first-time applicants 

 

Open To:

The following organizations are eligible for GMF funding:

  • Canadian municipal governments
  • Municipally owned corporations
  • Indigenous communities if:
    • partnering with a municipal government;
    • have a shared service agreement with a municipal government related to municipal infrastructure, climate change or adaptation 
Expected Output:

Studies that aim to strengthen source separation practices for construction, renovation and demolition (CRD) waste and advance circularity through increased recovery, sorting, storing, reusing and recycling. Studies may also address CRD waste prevention, reduction, repair, refurbishment, repurpose and remanufacturing as applicable.

Eligible studies must assess the viability of CRD waste circular solutions, such as:  

  • waste prevention
  • waste recovery, sorting, storing, extending product life cycle-materials and recycling
  • strengthening source separation and selective deconstruction approaches  
  • infrastructure and site location and governance, equipment, transporting logistics, regulations and permitting, available CRD waste quantities, potential markets, environmental impacts and communications
  • partnerships (with other municipalities, private sector) and inter-departmental collaborations within your municipality
  • policies (bylaws, RFPs, procurements, incentives, waste management plans and circular economy roadmap)
  • operationalization methodology

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT:

All grant recipient municipal staff will participate in a two-year cohort designed to help improve project outcomes, scale funding initiatives, build skills and knowledge and promote project outcomes. Cohort members will receive free additional support from GMF dedicated to help them implement their project and go even further in creating the groundwork for a circular construction materials ecosystem in their municipality or region.

As part of the cohort, you will:

  • access free coaching, training and collaboration services to build your skills in the circular economy construction sector
  • work with other municipalities both within the cohort and beyond to exchange best practices, resources and lessons learned as you move collectively towards solving similar challenges
  • increase your capacity to work with key implementation partners (e.g., private sector actors, regional construction associations, non-profits) to help achieve long-term project results
  • collectively explore opportunities for scaling project outcomes by sharing results nationally and connecting in the national and international circular economy ecosystems
Application Deadline:

The pre-application deadline is June 26, 2026.

 

Eligible Costs:

See list of eligible costs.  

Your study should examine the current construction, renovation and demolition (CRD) waste landscape and assess the feasibility of solutions to divert CRD materials from disposal. This includes strengthening source-separation practices and advancing circularity through improved recovery, sorting, storage, reuse and recycling. Where relevant, the study may also address upstream strategies such as CRD waste prevention, reduction, repair, refurbishment, repurposing and remanufacturing.

Here are suggested project milestones:

  • project initiation and set-up
  • procurement
  • research and baseline assessment
  • stakeholder engagement
  • opportunities and scenario analysis
  • recommendations and roadmap development
  • reporting and approval

* The following applicants may qualify for a grant of up to 80 percent of eligible project costs:  

  • municipalities with a population of 10,000 or under;  
  • regional governments or groups of municipalities where the average population of the member municipalities is 10,000 or under;  
  • eligible Indigenous communities; and,  
  • northern communities

Northern and eligible Indigenous communities that are applying to GMF for the first time may qualify for a grant of up to 100 percent of eligible costs.

Contact us to learn more

The North is defined as the three territories and the northern extent of seven provinces. This includes portions of the following provinces defined by Statistics Canada codes: Newfoundland and Labrador (10), Québec (24), Ontario (35), Manitoba (46), Saskatchewan (47), Alberta (48) and British Columbia (59). 

What we fund  

We fund projects that aim to enable the conditions to enhance construction waste diversion by strengthening source separation practices and advancing circularity through increased recovery, sorting, storing, reusing and recycling. Studies may also address CRD waste prevention, reduction, repair, refurbishment, repurpose and remanufacturing as applicable.

Studies must assess local needs and the feasibility of solutions to divert construction, renovation and demolition waste by examining topics such as:

  • available material quantities by CRD source and category, including material flow analysis
  • existing and required infrastructure, equipment, transportation logistics, regulations and permitting
  • site location considerations, community impact and governance options
  • potential partners, including other municipalities, private-sector actors and relevant municipal departments
  • required local and regional policies and engagement mechanisms (e.g., bylaws, RFPs, procurement approaches, incentives, roadmaps, waste management plans, deconstruction audits)
  • potential markets and end uses for recovered materials
  • environmental impacts (e.g., greenhouse gas reduction, diversion rates)
  • communication and capacity-building needs (e.g., awareness-raising, information sharing, training)

Studies may also include an assessment of infrastructure options that would be required to support an increase in CRD waste recovery, sorting, storing, reusing and recycling such as:

  • circular drop-off centres
  • reuse, repair, value-added production and storage centres
  • resale centres
  • logistics hubs for transportation and container storage
  • CRD transfer stations or temporary depot sites
  • CRD material recovery facilities
  • CRD recycling facilities serving specific or multiple CRD material categories

Applications must demonstrate that the proposed project reflects a municipal commitment or forms part of an existing or planned municipal strategy. For example, the project is identified in a municipal waste management plan, a circular economy roadmap and/or an approved or proposed council resolution (to be considered by council prior to the project start date).

Priority will be given to initiatives that:  

  • include the development of construction waste policies and an operationalization strategy
  • address diverse construction waste sources (e.g., new construction, renovation, selective deconstruction, curb collection/bulky waste, waste drop-off centres, disaster-related debris)  
  • address as many diversion strategies as possible (e.g., waste prevention, recovery, sorting, sorting, keeping products and materials in use, recycling)
  • prioritize source-separation approaches

All approved recipients will have a chance to refine their baseline data and set more accurate targets through a peer-learning support program, where they will also receive guidance on monitoring and reporting project outcomes.  

What your project needs to achieve  

Only projects that meet the criteria on this page are eligible. Please note that we consider several factors in making a funding decision. We strive to fund the most innovative and impactful initiatives as well as support communities of all sizes, so not all eligible projects will be approved for funding.  

Applicants must commit to actively participating in the peer learning support program to be considered for funding.    

Preference will be given to initiatives that:  

  • include the development of construction waste policies and an operationalization strategy
  • address diverse construction waste sources (e.g., new construction, renovation, selective deconstruction, curb collection/bulky waste, waste drop-off centres, disaster-related debris)  
  • address as many diversion strategies as possible (e.g., waste prevention, recovery, sorting, sorting, keeping products and materials in use, recycling)
  • prioritize source-separation approaches
  • assess existing and required infrastructure, equipment and transportation logistics
  • are led by a multidisciplinary team, representing key roles (e.g., representatives from all key departments involved in implementation, such as waste management, environment, land use planning, technical or engineering services, economic development, legal, public works, fire services, finance, construction inspection or management, communications and community engagement)
  • are conducted in collaboration with key implementation partners (e.g., private sector organizations, other municipalities or regional governments, non-profit organizations, consultants, external agencies, chambers of commerce and academic institutions)
  • develop municipal skills and favor a municipal culture of construction waste recovery and diversion
  • demonstrate the potential to generate significant socio-economic benefits such as:  
    • creating jobs in material recovery, recycling, refurbishment, and specialized construction services  
    • providing workforce integration and training opportunities for people facing barriers to employment
    • increasing supply chain resilience by mitigating risks from fluctuating prices or shortages of virgin materials.
    • providing access to low-cost construction materials (e.g., through material exchange centres)
    • encouraging entrepreneurship (e.g., small businesses or co-ops focused on material refurbishment or upcycling).

Equity considerations  

GMF recognizes that many urgent social issues are interrelated, and that climate action and sustainability initiatives need to be designed to ensure fair distribution of benefits and burdens, across all segments of a community and across generations. Projects will be assessed on their potential to result in improved socio-economic outcomes and a more equitable distribution of benefits and burdens among the community, for present and future generations. While projects can be eligible without incorporating these considerations, preference is given to projects that:  

  • integrate principles of Reconciliation, anti-racism, equity and inclusion  
  • apply inclusive community engagement practices  
  • implement social procurement practices, for example buying from local vendors, small businesses, diverse businesses or social enterprises.  
  • generate other socio-economic benefits, such as improved accessibility, improved outdoor spaces and opportunities for inclusive employment and apprenticeship  

As you develop your project, consider the following questions:  

  • How can you design an engagement approach that would enable you to consider the diverse needs, experiences, and voices of all stakeholders and rights holders in this project?  
  • Which equity-deserving groups might benefit the most, and/or be burdened, directly or indirectly, by this project? How are these groups positively or negatively impacted?  
  • Are there opportunities to address or mitigate negative impacts?  
  • Are there opportunities to rectify existing or potential biases, discrimination, or exclusionary practices in your project planning, design, funding, and implementation?  
  • How can you maximize the socio-economic benefits that your project generates?  
  • How can you leverage your procurement practices to generate more positive social, economic and environmental outcomes within your community and region?  

Required documents  

When the application intake period opens this summer, you must submit the following to apply for this GMF funding:

  • a pre-application form  
  • an application form  
  • a project workbook  
  • all required supporting documents specified in the application guide.   
  • Reach out to a GMF representative to discuss your project at gmfinfo@fcm.ca or 1-877-417-0550.  

Quebec municipalities

FCM has an agreement with Quebec's ministère des Affaires municipales et de l'Habitation (MAMH) Opens in a new tab. that allows the ministry to review applications to GMF before they are submitted to FCM. Quebec municipalities applying for funding from GMF must follow the process below to submit their application to MAMH.

Once you have completed all the steps in the ‘How to apply’ section above, submit your application by following the steps below. Note that the content of the links is available in French only.

  • Save your application form using the appropriate file name.
    • Save the application form to your local device with the following filename: FMV_ "your municipality's name"_ "date" (YYMMDD). For example: FMV_TownofABC_180228.pdf
  • Log in to the Portail gouvernemental des affaires municipales et régionales Opens in a new tab.. using your username and password.
    • To submit your form click on “File Transfer”.
    • In the “Recipient” drop-down list, select the applicable program.
    • Upload your files and select “Transfer” once your request is complete.
  • Receive confirmation from MAMH.
    • MAMH assesses the applications to ensure that the projects submitted do not conflict with Quebec's government policies and directives. Once the assessment has been completed, MAMH informs the applicant of their decision and sends compliant applications to GMF for review.
    • MAMH requires up to 20 working days to review the application and forward it to GMF.
  • Receive approval from GMF.
    • GMF will inform the applicant once they receive the application from MAMH and review the submission. If the application is approved for funding, an agreement between FCM and the applicant is prepared.
 

Please note that applications closed on June 26, 2026.

SIGN UP, LEARN MORE, STAY UP TO DATE

Sign up to Connect and stay up to date with GMF news and the latest resources, e-courses and funding opportunities.

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Related Resources

Accelerating the transition to a circular economy: Material reuse for a net-zero future

Practical solutions to optimize logistics, regulations and the recovery of materials in the construction sector

Read more

Case study: Trash to treasure at the HodgePodge Lodge

Strathcona County’s award-winning community hub diverts waste and fosters community connections

Read more

Case Study: How Lac-Saint-Jean’s Réemploi+ program is building a circular economy

Receiving, transforming and reselling still-useful waste while creating jobs? It’s a win-win for this Quebec community.

Read more

 

Are you looking for advice on how to develop a local community efficiency financing initiative? These initiatives help remove barriers to home energy upgrades while lowering energy bills, improving comfort for homeowners and delivering economic, social and environmental benefits for your community.

Watch our webinar recording, How to Accelerate Local Home Energy Upgrades, to hear from sector experts on how to overcome common challenges, including tools and tactics you can use in your municipality.

In this webinar, you’ll learn:

  • About inspiring Community Efficiency Financing (CEF) success stories from across Canada
  • The benefits of local community financing initiatives
  • Best practices and recommendations for developing your own financing initiatives

Speakers:

  • Shannon Giebelhaus, Program Lead, Contractor Management, Sustainability Services, Alberta Municipalities
  • Soren Christianson, Project Manager, Climate Leadership, Better Homes Kingston
  • Caley Halcro, Project Manager, Sustainability Division, City of Saskatoon’s Home Energy Loan Program
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:
Photo of solar panels on the front cover of a GMF guide

Clean energy generation is a growing opportunity for municipalities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lower long-term operating costs and improve energy resilience. By investing in renewable energy—such as solar, wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal—municipalities can advance their climate goals while strengthening local energy security.

However, successful projects begin with the basics. Our guide encourages decision-makers to first reduce energy use and maximize efficiency—especially through no- and low-cost measures. This strategic approach, following the Energy Hierarchy framework, ensures renewables are introduced at the right time for maximum benefit.

When you're ready to pursue renewable energy solutions, this guide will help you build a strong business case. It highlights key considerations, including financial viability, stakeholder engagement and grant opportunities.

You'll also find real-world examples of Alberta municipalities that have implemented renewable energy systems—along with insights into how they funded their projects.

In this guide, you'll find:

  • an overview of the Energy Hierarchy framework
  • what to include in a comprehensive business case
  • types of renewable energy systems
  • funding sources and grant opportunities in Alberta

Download the guide.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Related funding

Sustainable Municipal Buildings

Energy-efficient upgrades and new builds: Investing in a smarter, sustainable future

Read more

Community Energy Systems

Meet community energy needs and build resilience with funding for renewable energy projects

Read more

Organic Waste-to-Energy

Recover value and energy from organic materials and landfill gas with funding for waste solutions

Read more

Does your community have a plan to care for its newly planted trees? The long-term health and sustainability of your community’s urban forests depend on a well-executed tree maintenance and monitoring plan. A strong plan will support healthy tree growth, track progress and respond to challenges over time.  

Use this template to create a tree maintenance and monitoring plan. You’ll document maintenance activities, collect data on your planting sites or species, define and measure and the success of your urban forestry project, and much more.  

Fill the template to start your plan 

This template will guide you through the process of developing a tree maintenance and monitoring plan.  

Coverage of the tree monitoring and maintenance plan template

This includes:

  • Planning for long-term care: outline how you will maintain trees over time and carry out reactive or unplanned maintenance.  
  • Tracking and adapting over time: identify how you will monitor tree health, survival and site conditions, and use that information to respond to issues such as stress, pests, disease or extreme weather.
  • Clarifying roles and responsibilities: define who will carry out maintenance and monitoring activities, how often they will occur, and how data will be stored and used to inform future maintenance or adaptive management activities.  

Download the template 


This resource was created in partnership by Tree Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund (GMF) for the Growing Canada’s Community Canopies initiative, which is delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and funded by the Government of Canada.

Canada - Tree Canada Logo
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Energy efficiency isn’t just a technical upgrade, it’s a strategic investment in long-term affordability, resident well-being and climate resilience. For affordable housing providers, integrating energy-efficient measures into new builds or retrofit projects can raise questions about upfront costs and planning complexity. But the benefits are clear: lower operating costs, healthier indoor environments and improved comfort for residents.

If you represent a not-for-profit organization, housing co-operative or municipal authority engaged in affordable housing, this factsheet can help you build a compelling case for energy efficiency that resonates with your board and funders. By highlighting the financial, social and environmental returns early in the planning phase, you can strengthen support for including energy efficiency measures in your capital projects and ensure your housing investments deliver lasting value.

Review the information below to learn how to make the case to your board and funders and explore next steps for integrating energy efficiency into your buildings.
 

Be informed

 Efficient buildings lower operating costs
  • Make it clear that a more efficient building will have lower ongoing operating costs for heating fuel and electricity.
     
  • Implementing energy conservation measures (ECM) that reduce electricity and fuel usage will save you money on your energy bills. ECMs such as tuning up old equipment, purchasing higher-quality equipment and lowering equipment usage will help lower maintenance costs.
     
  • Lower energy consumption also makes your ongoing expenses more predictable, as you will be less affected by energy cost increases and sudden price shocks. This stabilizes your budget and the rent you charge to residents. As prices increase, a more efficient building will be more competitive in the market. Run your business case by inputting several different values for annual fuel escalation costs to evaluate this risk.
     
  • Explore real-world examples:

Case study: Pine Tree Park

The Pine Tree Park retrofit in Cape Breton, NS, demonstrates how deep energy upgrades and solar installations can significantly reduce operating costs. After replacing oil furnaces with high-efficiency heat pumps and installing a 700kW solar array, residents saw their monthly utility bills drop by approximately $200, translating to an annual savings of about $2,500 per household.

Case study: Heartland Housing Foundation

The Heartland Housing Foundation’s new net-zero affordable housing complex in Fort Saskatchewan, AB, showcases how smart design can drastically reduce operating costs. This 83-unit new build uses solar panels, electric HVAC systems, and a high-performance building envelope so that the housing units achieve net-zero energy by generating as much energy as they consume.

Case study: Sundance Housing Co-operative

The Sundance Housing Co-operative in Edmonton, AB, completed Canada’s largest panelized deep energy retrofit to eliminate natural gas use in its 59-unit townhouse complex. By installing prefabricated wall panels, upgrading insulation, replacing windows and doors, and adding electric heat pumps and rooftop solar panels, the co-op reduced energy consumption by up to 84 percent. Thanks to the reduction in externally supplied energy the co-op hopes to save members up to $100,000 cumulatively each year. Residents now enjoy quieter, more comfortable homes while preventing 330 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions each year.

To explore projects in your region, consult GMF's project database.  

  • For more specific numbers, have an energy modeler and cost consultant on your design team run an analysis that’s specific to your building, location, and construction/utility costs. If there are other efficient or net-zero buildings in your area, you can talk to their operators to see how their costs have compared to a more conventional building.
Efficient buildings cut emissions and risk
  • The building and equipment choices you make today can either lock in future risk or build long-term resilience and affordability.
     
  • Buildings that rely on fossil fuels are more likely to face rising costs and uncertainty in the future due to evolving regulations and market pressure. By improving energy efficiency and/or switching to technologies like heat pumps, housing providers can reduce these risks and make their buildings more stable and affordable over time.
     
  • Emitting greenhouse gases is likely to become less politically and publicly acceptable over time as the effects of climate change become more severe. Building efficiently now is cheaper than retrofitting later.
Higher building performance unlocks funding opportunities
  • Improved energy efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas emissions is a condition of obtaining approval for some funding or loan programs. In some cases, exceeding the minimum requirements makes it more likely that your project will be approved quickly.
     
  • Learn about additional funding sources to support your affordable housing project through GMF's funders list for sustainable affordable housing.
Use energy efficiency to engage and empower residents
  • By minimizing the energy use under your control as a building operator (e.g. heating, cooling, ventilation, common area lighting) you set a good example for your residents. This can encourage them to minimize the energy use within their control (e.g. lighting, plug-in appliances, hot water).
     
  • If you have a building energy monitoring system (BEMS) you can even install a display in the lobby that encourages efficient behaviours by showing current and historical energy use. If you don’t have a BEMS, consider including it in your design.
     
  • Learn more about how a building energy monitoring system can lower costs and emissions through this GMF factsheet: Get started on energy monitoring.
Design choices build community trust
  • Improving energy efficiency shows you care about your surroundings and may make your project more acceptable to neighbours, reducing public opposition and making project approval from local authorities more likely.
     
  • Energy-efficient new builds and deeply retrofitted homes help communities create dignified, comfortable living spaces that residents feel proud to call their own.
     
Efficient buildings support climate resilience and occupants’ well-being
  • More efficient buildings also have features that can improve occupants’ well-being, such as better thermal comfort, indoor air quality and access to natural lighting.
     
  • Efficient buildings tend to be more resilient to extreme weather events and other effects of climate change. For example, a well-insulated building will keep occupants warm in a winter power outage for much longer. A building with good passive solar shading will keep its occupants’ cooler in case of a summer outage.
Local sourcing strengthens regional economies
  • Local sourcing helps regional economies by keeping money within the community, supporting local fuel harvesting and processing jobs and reducing dependence on imported conventional fuels, when these resources are used sustainably and are locally available.

 

Icon_dig_0.png Make your case

  • When presenting to the board, come prepared with a stakeholder engagement plan that shows you have gathered the necessary information, developed a clear path forward and already consulted with key parties.
     
  • This positions the board to initiate broader engagement with tenants/members sooner rather than later, ensuring the process is structured and informed from the start

Icon_dig_0.png Next steps

  • Consult our resource library and sign up for our Building Operator Training e-course to support your ongoing learning.
     
  • Connect with peers in your region who have completed similar projects using GMF's project database.
     
  • Check out SAH’s five factsheets that provide a “how to” for successful projects.
     
  • Get in touch with a Regional Energy Coach for a free consultation and help with:
     
    • identifying energy conservation measures
    • exploring funding opportunities
    • developing your stakeholder engagement plan  
    • attending a board meeting to support education
       
  • Sign up for FCM Connect to get the latest news about funding and capacity development opportunities. Our newsletters share helpful information about relevant funding, courses, conferences, webinars, workshops and awards. It also contains case studies, articles, guidebooks and reports on affordable housing and energy efficiency.

This resource was created with contributions from the Rural Development Network.

The logo for the Rural Development Network, featuring three diamond shapes in different shades of green, fanned out next to the name in grey text

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

 

Fire-resistant retrofits cut ignition pathways, buying time for buildings and people during fires. Replacing vulnerable components within the building envelope and surrounding structures (roofs, siding, vents, decks, fences) with fire-resistant assemblies reduces ember entry and direct flame contact, primary causes of structure loss in wildland–urban interface fires.

For small and rural communities who face longer response times to wildfires and limited capacity in emergency response, targeted material upgrades are a fast, effective way to lower risks for priority facilities.

This guidance outlines key steps, best practices, costing information and case studies to help municipalities plan and deliver fire-resistant material installation projects.

 

Key steps for successful implementation

  • Identify priority buildings and zones: Start with community-serving sites such as clinics, community centres and libraries, and a non-combustible zone of 0–1.5 metres at foundations, decks and attachments.
  • Select compliant materials: Use non-combustible or class-A rated assemblies for roofing, siding, soffits, vents and decks (e.g., metal or class-A shingles; stucco/brick/fibre-cement; metal vents with three millimetres of screening mesh)
  • Detail for ember resistance: Enclose deck undersides, screen vents and openings, block soffits/fascia, and remove combustible mulch that is against walls
  • Permit, procure and stage works: Align with local and national guidelines1; bundle small scopes of work, such as roofs and vents, to reduce mobilization costs
  • Inspect and maintain: Schedule annual checks of sealants, screens and flashings; keep zones clear of fine fuels

Best practices for design and delivery

  • Pick proven assemblies: Favour stucco, brick or fibre-cement siding; metal or class-A roof shingles; non-combustible fascia/soffits; metal vents with three millimetres of screening mesh; and fire-rated decking or enclosed deck bases
  • Design for affordability and upkeep: Choose readily available, code-recognized products (e.g., fibre-cement, metal) and simple details that crews can easily maintain
  • Use municipal lists/templates: Access regional or provincial templates (e.g., via CanadaBuys2 or InfraGuide3) or document current project practices to build internal reference tools

Equity and community considerations

  • Prioritize facilities serving those most at-risk during emergencies: Retrofit public buildings such as clinics and social housing; upgrades like fire-resistant roofs, vents and siding can help these facilities function as clean air/warm air/cool air refuges during emergencies
  • Pair retrofits with public education: Use retrofit projects as opportunities to raise awareness about wildfire risks and the role of resilient infrastructure
  • Build local capacity: Where possible, engage local vendors and offer training to support workforce development and economic resilience

Costing and budgeting information

Fire-resistant material installation can cost $30–$400 per square metre of building envelope, depending on building type, material selection and retrofit complexity.

Typical cost drivers include the following: permits/inspections (Wildfire DPA/bylaw compliance); mobilization for remote sites; disposal of old materials; and post-retrofit maintenance.

To help reduce overall costs:

  • Treat the highest-risk areas first (the first 0–10 metres around buildings), expanding as funds allow
  • Standardize specs and buy in bulk by coordinating purchases across departments and projects
  • Leverage in-house staff and volunteers for light work such as clearing vegetation around buildings, installing ember-resistant vent screens or painting fire-resistant coatings (tasks that can be completed through supervised community work bees or maintenance days)
  • Share or rent equipment like chippers or brush cutters with neighbours
  • Book shoulder-season vendor rates and use municipal materials lists to streamline procurement

Case studies and lessons learned

Bylaw-driven wildfire resilience through design standards (Nelson, BC, 2022)

The City of Nelson adopted wildfire design guidelines based on FireSmart principles, requiring a non-combustible 0–1.5 metre zone around buildings and prescribing fire-resistant materials in the 1.5–10 metre zone. These standards are tied directly to development approvals, streamlining compliance and embedding wildfire resilience into everyday municipal planning.

Lesson learned: Clear, enforceable municipal standards make consistent fire-resistant retrofits feasible at scale and reduce case-by-case negotiation.

Post-fire analysis to guide fire-resistant retrofits and detailing (Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo, AB, 2019)

Following the Fort McMurray wildfire, post-fire analysis by the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction revealed that homes with ignition-resistant roofs and cladding were more likely to survive. However, many losses were traced to vulnerable attachments, such as vents, soffits, decks, fences and nearby vegetation. This highlighted the importance of whole-building detailing.

Lesson learned: For small communities, upgrading headline materials like roofing is not enough. Addressing edge conditions and interfaces (e.g., vents, decks, fences) is also important to reduce ignition pathways and improve building survivability.

Locally produced hemp blocks offer fire and moisture resilience with economic co-benefits (Elk Point, AB, 2025)

Asinikahtamwak, a company majority-owned by Frog Lake First Nation, produces hemp–cement blocks that are lighter than cinder blocks and resistant to mold and fire. For small communities, locally produced blocks can cut transport costs and provide culturally aligned, lower-carbon materials for community facilities.

Lesson learned: Emerging bio-based masonry can pair resilience in both fire and moisture performance with economic co-benefits, especially when supply chains are regional and culturally grounded.

*Note: The case studies included on this page are for informational purposes and were not supported by the Green Municipal Fund.

Additional resources

National guide for wildland–urban interface fires (National Research Council of Canada) – This resource offers technical guidance on hazard/exposure assessment and property protection. It also discusses the Canadian Board for Harmonized Construction Codes’ role in updating these codes to ensure they meet the evolving needs of safety, energy efficiency and environmental considerations in the building sector.

Home development guide (FireSmart) – This guide outlines materials and assembly guidance for roofs, siding, decks and vents with practical diagrams. It also highlights community-level planning and preparedness, encouraging neighbourhoods to collaborate and mitigate wildfire threats. Although the guide focuses on residential properties, similar principles and approaches apply to community facilities.

Construction and landscaping checklists (FireSmart BC and the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction) – These checklists provide guidance for builders, developers and planners to create homes and communities that are more resilient to wildland fires by following best practices in site planning, architectural design, materials selection and landscaping. Examples include product characteristics, test standards and detailing tips.

FireSmart materials list (City of Nelson) – This is a list of pre-vetted local materials for less-flammable construction. Practical, actionable strategies for enhancing community and individual home resilience, including considerations for plants, construction materials and general property maintenance are also discussed.

Explore more community facilities resilience activities

Learn about other community facilities resilience project types and how they can support your community:

Return to the Resilient Community Facilities Toolkit for Municipalities


Related toolkits

GMF offers additional toolkits to support municipalities facing different climate risks. 


Glossary

Wildland–urban interface (WUI): The zone where human development meets or intermingles with wildland vegetation, often at high wildfire risk

Fire-resistant assemblies: Building components (e.g., roofs, siding) designed to withstand ignition from embers or flames  

Non-combustible zone: A defensible space (typically 0–1.5 metres around buildings) cleared of flammable materials to reduce fire risk

Class-A rated materials: Building products tested and certified to offer the highest level of fire resistance

Ember resistance: Design features that prevent wind-driven embers from entering or igniting structures

FireSmart: A Canadian program offering guidelines and best practices for wildfire resilience in communities

Soffits: Architectural features that require screening or sealing to prevent ember intrusion

Mobilization costs: Expenses related to transporting materials, equipment and labour to remote or rural retrofit sites

Bio-based masonry: Sustainable building materials (e.g., hemp–cement blocks) offering fire and moisture resistance

Priority Zone 1a: The critical area within 0–1.5 metres of a structure, prioritized for fire-resistant upgrades


Select resources
  1. https://nrc.canada.ca/en/certifications-evaluations-standards/codes-canada/construction-innovation/new-national-guide-wildland-urban-interface-fires
  2. https://canadabuys.canada.ca/en
  3. https://greenmunicipalfund.ca/resources/infraguide-national-guide-sustainable-municipal-infrastructure
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Green roofs are roofing systems that are partially or completely covered with vegetation, planted over a drainage layer and a waterproof membrane. They are installed to reduce building heat stress, manage stormwater and support sustainable building design.

Green roofs increase a facility’s resilience by improving insulation, lowering energy costs and mitigating urban heat islands. For small and rural Canadian communities, they extend the lifespan of public buildings, enhance indoor comfort during extreme heat, and provide a visible, community-driven climate adaptation. This is especially so when green roofs are installed on well-used facilities like libraries, arenas or community centres.

This guidance outlines key steps, best practices, costing information and case studies to help municipalities plan and deliver green roof installation projects.

Key steps for successful implementation

  • Assess structural feasibility: Conduct an engineering review to confirm that the roof can support soil, plants and snow loads, and that its slope is compatible with a living roof
  • Secure permits and waterproofing: Ensure designs align with municipal building codes and include durable membranes to prevent leaks
  • Design slope and drainage: Plan for proper runoff and integrate soil-moisture sensors or simple irrigation systems; consider a retention pond to recirculate irrigation water
  • Select climate-appropriate plants: Use native plants like sedums, drought-resistant grasses or other hardy perennials suited to local conditions
  • Develop an operations and maintenance plan: Schedule spring and fall inspections, drain checks, and replanting where it is needed

Best practices for design and delivery

  • Ensure safe access: Design roofs with secure access points—such as hatches or ladders—and install fall protection systems to reduce safety risks (this is essential for small buildings, as limited space and lower roof heights can lead to overlooked hazards)
  • Build partnerships: Collaborate with local horticultural groups for plant selection, partner with schools for educational programming, and involve building operators early to ensure long-term maintenance and monitoring

Equity and community considerations

  • Prioritize vulnerable groups: Install green roofs on public facilities (e.g., libraries, social housing) where older adults, children and people living on lower incomes can benefit most from better temperature regulation, reduced noise and cleaner air during extreme weather events
  • Integrate Indigenous Knowledge: Engage Indigenous partners early to integrate Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) into plant selection and design, being sure to offer honoraria for their time and expertise; support the hiring of Indigenous vendors
  • Explore social use potential: Design green roofs to include accessible gathering areas or educational features where structurally feasible

Costing and budgeting information

Green roof installation projects can cost $150–$700 per square metre, depending on roof size, structural conditions and design complexity.

Typical cost drivers include the following: site assessment and structural engineering; permits and inspections; waterproofing and drainage systems; growing medium and plant selection; labour and scaffolding; and ongoing maintenance (e.g., weeding, irrigation, drain checks).

To help reduce overall costs:

  • Start with extensive or semi-intensive systems that require less structural reinforcement and maintenance

  • Use drought-tolerant native plants to reduce irrigation need

  • Engage local volunteers or green job trainees for planting and light maintenance

  • Partner with local nurseries or landscape programs for donated or discounted plants and materials

Case studies and lessons learned

Collaborative green roof installation to manage stormwater and build climate resilience (Tantramar, NB, 2022)

Over the span of two years, the Town of Tantramar installed a green roof on its town hall to improve freshwater management, reduce flood risk and enhance climate resilience. The project emphasized ecological benefits and community engagement, adapting plans midway to overcome logistical and pandemic-related challenges.

Lesson learned: Small communities can navigate complex installations by remaining flexible—modifying design plans, expanding roof areas, and using virtual outreach to maintain momentum despite limited resources and external disruptions.

Green roof retrofit to transform civic space and showcase climate adaptation (Campbell River, BC, 2018)

Campbell River renovated its city hall’s roof with a combination of extensive green roofing and a landscaped public courtyard, funded through the Federal Gas Tax Fund. The retrofit served both functional and educational purposes, demonstrating how civic infrastructure can respond to local climate vulnerabilities.

Lesson learned: Green roof retrofits can turn underused municipal spaces into visible climate adaptation assets, offering both environmental benefits and public engagement opportunities for small communities.

*Note: The case studies included on this page are for informational purposes and were not supported by the Green Municipal Fund.

Additional resources

Ecoroof guide for municipalities (Rockies Institute) – This guide offers municipalities insights into converting rooftops into green spaces, highlighting benefits like improved air quality and stormwater management. It includes considerations for smaller-scale implementation.

Green roof construction guidelines (Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program) –Provides technical guidance on green roof design, plant selection and structural considerations. The resource is well-suited for small communities with limited budgets seeking to integrate green infrastructure into public buildings.

Toronto green roof construction standard supplementary guidelines (City of Toronto) –This guideline provides best practices and explanatory materials to assist designers in meeting the city's green roof requirements, aligning with the Ontario Building Code and promoting sustainable urban development. While developed for an urban setting, the design principles and performance standards are adaptable to smaller municipalities.

Explore more community facilities activities

Learn about other community facilities project types and how they can support your community:

  • Battery-powered generators/battery back-up projects
  • Fire-resistant material installation projects

Return to the Resilient Community Facilities Toolkit for Municipalities


Related toolkits

GMF offers additional toolkits to support municipalities facing different climate risks. 


Glossary

Green roof: A rooftop system layered with soil and vegetation to improve insulation, manage water and reduce heat

Stormwater management: Techniques used to control runoff from rain, reducing flooding and improving water quality

Urban heat island: A phenomenon where urban areas are significantly warmer than surrounding rural areas due to human activities and infrastructure

Structural feasibility: The ability of a building’s roof to support the added weight of soil, plants and water

Waterproofing membrane: A protective layer that prevents water from penetrating the roof structure beneath the green roof

Native plants: Vegetation naturally adapted to the local climate, requiring less maintenance and water

Operations and maintenance plan: A scheduled plan for inspecting, maintaining and replanting green roof systems

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): Indigenous knowledge systems that inform sustainable practices, including plant selection and ecological design

Retention pond: A water feature used to collect and reuse irrigation runoff from green roofs

Fall protection: Safety measures (e.g., guardrails, harnesses) to prevent injury during roof access and maintenance

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Battery back-ups provide a secondary source of power that keeps essential community services running when the primary source of power is out. Increasingly frequent storms, extreme weather, climate-related outages and peak demand challenges mean rural and remote communities face longer restoration times and greater risks of service disruption.

Back-up systems, whether portable or integrated, help protect critical functions. They allow public facilities to serve asresilience hubs and safe shelters during emergencies.

This guidance outlines key steps, best practices, costing information and case studies to help municipalities plan and deliver battery-powered generator and battery back-up projects.

Key steps for successful implementation

  • Obtain permits and ensure compliance: Secure electrical permits, use CSA-certified equipment1 and hire a licensed electrician and gas fitter if required
  • Determine critical loads: Conduct an energy audit to identify appliances and systems that must be powered (e.g., refrigeration, heat pumps, communications)
  • Choose the right system: Consider size, fuel source, solar-ready options or smart panels for load prioritization; ensure proper ventilation
  • Develop risk and safety protocols: Prepare emergency response procedures for fire, overheating, fuel leaks or electrical hazards
  • Plan for testing and maintenance: Schedule regular inspections, software updates and battery performance checks

Best practices for design and delivery

  • Engage the community early: Survey residents on concerns such as noise, safety and aesthetics; use their feedback to guide placement and design while communicating benefits and setting clear expectations
  • Plan for inclusivity: Select public buildings (e.g., libraries, clinics, community centres) with open access, extended hours and physical accessibility; prioritize locations in equity-deserving neighbourhoods to ensure benefits reach those most impacted during service disruptions
  • Train facility staff and neighbours: Provide clear training on system operation and maintenance, extending the invitation to operators in nearby municipalities and Indigenous communities to build regional capacity

Equity and community considerations

  • Prioritize multi-purpose community hubs: Select facilities that already serve as trusted gathering spaces and that can function as clean air/warm air/cool air refuges during emergencies; sites with existing social programming (e.g., libraries, community centres) are more likely to attract diverse residents
  • Ensure equitable access: Set clear public access hours, barrier-free entry, transportation options; consider social barriers too, including groups who may face discrimination or feel unsafe in public spaces
  • Build Indigenous partnerships: Use installations as training opportunities for Indigenous and neighbouring communities to build workforce development and advance reconciliation

Costing and budgeting information

Battery back-up system installation can cost $1,200–$8,000 per kW for battery systems, depending on system size, energy demand and integration complexity.

Typical cost drivers include the following: permits and inspections for electrical compliance; system design and integration with existing infrastructure; mobilization for remote or hard-to-access sites; disposal and recycling of old batteries or generator components; and ongoing maintenance.

To help reduce overall costs:

  • Fit the system to cover only critical loads (e.g., refrigeration, lighting, communications)
  • Coordinate bulk purchases across departments or neighbouring communities to reduce unit costs.
  • Schedule installations during off-peak seasons to access lower vendor rates and avoid delays
  • Plan end-of-life disposal and recycling to minimize disposal costs

Case studies and lessons learned

Multi-serving battery back-up and EV charging at community recreation hub (Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve, ON, 2023)

In 2023, Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve installed a battery back-up system at its community recreational complex, enhancing local energy resilience. The system stores electricity to provide reliable power during outages. It supports peak demand and integrates with renewable energy sources. Installed alongside two level-2 and two fast EV charging stations, the facility now serves as a multi-functional hub that supports recreation, transportation and emergency response.

Lesson learned: Even a single public facility can double as an emergency refuge and energy resource during outages, especially when paired with complementary infrastructure.

Hybrid back-up power system for a multi-unit residential building (Vancouver, BC, 2019)

This study modelled five back-up power system options for an 80-kW load over a 72-hour outage at a small residential co-op. Options included combinations of diesel, propane, solar PV and lithium-ion batteries. The propane + lithium-ion + solar PV system was found to offer the best balance of resilience, environmental impact and cost-effectiveness, with a net present value within five percent of a baseline diesel generator.

Lesson learned: Small facilities can achieve meaningful resilience and emissions reductions by combining modest battery storage with solar and propane systems, especially when energy pricing structures support peak load management.

*Note: The case studies included on this page are for informational purposes and were not supported by the Green Municipal Fund.

Additional resources

Back-up power guidelines (City of Toronto) – This document provides practical guidance for integrating back-up power systems into buildings, with adaptable recommendations for public facilities like community centres and shelters. Communities can use it to assess power needs, identify suitable technologies and plan for emergency preparedness.

Canada’s home electrification toolkit (Building Decarbonization Alliance) – This national resource offers guidance on selecting and installing home battery systems and back-up generators. It includes cost comparisons and technology options suitable for residential and small community use.

Municipal energy procurement toolkit (Association of Municipalities of Ontario) – This toolkit helps municipalities navigate procurement for energy projects, including battery storage, with guidance on site planning, public engagement and emergency management. It covers land-use planning, siting and agricultural protection in a concise format that helps staff quickly assess project fit and community impact using practical criteria.

Explore more community facilities resilience activities

Learn about other community facilities resilience project types and how they can support your community:

Return to the Resilient Community Facilities Toolkit for Municipalities


Related toolkits

GMF offers additional toolkits to support municipalities facing different climate risks. 


Glossary

Battery back-up: A system that stores electricity to power essential services during outages

Critical loads: Appliances or systems (e.g., HVAC, refrigeration) that must remain powered during emergencies

CSA-certified equipment: Electrical products approved by the Canadian Standards Association for safety and compliance

Smart panels: Electrical panels that prioritize and manage power distribution during limited supply situations

Energy audit: An assessment to determine energy usage and identify essential systems to back up

Resilience hub: A public facility equipped to provide shelter and services during emergencies

Distributed energy resource management systems (DERMS): Software platforms that optimize and control decentralized energy systems like batteries and solar

Solar-ready systems: Back-up systems designed to integrate with solar panels for renewable energy use

End-of-life disposal: The safe and environmentally responsible removal and recycling of used battery systems


Select resources
  1. CSA Group Product Listing - CSA Group
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:
simple graphic of buildings being protected by a shield

This toolkit provides step-by-step guidance, templates and examples to help municipalities protect and adapt community facilities, ensure continuity of services, and enhance community resilience. It offers practical, strategic and sustainable solutions.

Why building community facility resilience matters

Canada is heating at twice the global average, pushing buildings and power systems to their limits. 

Rising heat waves and heavier storms are straining community facilities, leaving residents at risk during outages and indoor heat emergencies. For small, rural and remote municipalities, the challenge is particularly serious: longer grid restoration times, fewer back-up options and higher vulnerability when essential services go offline.

Strengthening facilities that serve communities, such as arenas, libraries and health centres, is not only about keeping services running. These facilities often double as emergency hubs, providing safe shelter and critical support during crises.

Activities that strengthen facility resilience in small communities

Strengthening community-serving facilities ensures they remain safe, functional and accessible during climate-related disruptions. The following examples of upgrades combine practical design improvements with operational planning to protect essential services and provide reliable emergency support.

Explore practical, on-the-ground activities your community can implement:

  • Battery Backups – Keep essential services powered during outages, supporting residents for at least 72 hours

  • Lightweight green roofs – Reduce heat stress, improve stormwater management and lower building cooling needs

  • Fire- and storm-resistant materials – Strengthen buildings, reducing costly damage and downtime

  • Indoor air quality upgrades – Protect vulnerable residents during wildfire smoke or extreme heat events

  • Community refrigeration upgrades – Ensure that food and medicine can be safely stored during disruptions

 

Principles of community facility resilience projects

  • Prioritize community-serving facilities such as cooling centres, libraries, clinics, childcare, seniors centres, and other places that provide critical services during power outages
  • Pair upgrades with co-benefits by adding battery-backed clean air/cool rooms with clear public access protocols, equipping spaces to serve both daily and emergency uses
  • Choose the right size for your system to plan for long-term use from day one, making sure the facility meets all necessary permits and approvals, with operations and maintenance planning included upfront.

How community facility projects strengthen communities

What your community can gain:

  • Protection of essential services: Keeps arenas, libraries and health centres operational during outages and heat emergencies, ensuring residents have access to safe shelter and critical support when emergencies happen
  • Multiple co-benefits: Provide daily community value and safe havens during heat waves, wildfire smoke or outages, creating multi-solving outcomes that strengthen buy-in
  • Economic resilience: Reduces service disruptions, lowers emergency response costs and protects local economies

Tools and templates to plan your community facility project

Once you’ve identified the right project for your community, use these ready-to-go templates to plan, budget and implement it:

Download and adapt these tools, which include step-by-step guidance pre-populated to support community facility resilience planning and implementation.

 

Explore more climate adaptation toolkits

Heat resilience toolkit for small municipalities

Flood resilience toolkit for small municipalities

Wildfire resilience toolkit for small municipalities

Wildfire prevention training equips both staff and residents with the knowledge they need to reduce ignition risks and prepare for emergencies. Communities can turn prevention into everyday practice by education on FireSmart basics, incident awareness and cultural fire co-management.

For small and rural Canadian municipalities, accessible training builds local capacity, empowers volunteers, and strengthens cooperation across residents, Indigenous Knowledge holders and fire authorities. This helps communities act early and reduce risks before wildfires occur.

This guidance outlines key steps, best practices, costing information and case studies to help municipalities plan and deliver wildfire prevention training projects.

Key steps for successful implementation

  • Select target audiences: Choose the right training for staff, homeowners or volunteers (e.g., FireSmart basics for residents; facility preparedness for municipal staff)
  • Choose delivery formats: Combine short online modules, in-person workshops and community demo days for accessibility
  • Engage trainers and facilitators: Work with local fire agencies, Indigenous fire stewards or FireSmart program staff
  • Keep records: Track attendance and issue certificates to build credibility, motivate participation and support funding applications
  • Integrate training into routines: Align with existing council meetings, staff development days or community events

Best practices for design and delivery

  • Tailor delivery to audience needs: Run evening sessions for residents, daytime practical sessions for public works crews and hybrid formats for staff with limited availability
  • Offer blended formats: Pair short online modules with one field day to keep costs low and increase reach
  • Co-develop with Indigenous partners: Integrate Traditional Ecological Knowledge and cultural protocols to strengthen ecological and social outcomes
  • Partner with experts: Collaborate with FireSmart Canada, provincial wildfire agencies, and public health authorities to ensure alignment with recognized best practices
  • Encourage peer-to-peer learning: Support local FireSmart champions or ambassadors to share knowledge across neighbourhoods

Equity and community considerations

  • Cultural awareness and Indigenous Knowledge: Partner with Indigenous firekeepers as co-trainers, budget for honoraria and include cultural safety protocols
  • Address employment barriers: Link skills development to job opportunities in wildfire management, creating pathways for youth and underemployed populations
  • Accommodate accessibility: Provide transportation, childcare support and flexible scheduling for training and burn activities, to remove participation barriers for remote and rural communities

Costing and budgeting information

Wildfire prevention training projects typically cost $5,000–$25,000 per community session, depending on the number of participants and training topic.

Typical cost drivers include the following: instructor fees; venue rental; travel and accommodation for instructors (especially in remote areas); print and digital materials (e.g., flyers, posters, e-learning content); administrative costs (e.g., coordination, registration, logistics); and honoraria/compensation for Indigenous Knowledge holders and guest speakers.

To help reduce overall costs:

  • Leverage virtual or hybrid training formats to minimize travel and venue expenses
  • Partner with local organizations (schools, community centres) to access free or low-cost spaces
  • Bundle training sessions with other community events to share costs and increase participation

Case studies and lessons learned

Joint training built shared skills in cultural fire effects monitoring workshop (Ktunaxa Territory, BC, 2022)

This three-day workshop brought together Indigenous fire stewards, municipal staff and wildfire professionals to deepen understanding of cultural burning practices and fire effects monitoring. The event combined classroom sessions with field-based learning, focusing on how cultural burns can restore ecological balance, reduce wildfire risk and revitalize traditional land stewardship. The workshop trained 30+ participants in cultural fire planning and monitoring techniques.

Lesson learned: Joint training strengthens Indigenous–municipal collaboration and builds shared monitoring skills. Bringing diverse knowledge systems together fosters mutual respect, improves ecological outcomes and builds capacity for culturally relevant fire management.

Local delivery increased participation in FireSmart workshops (Saskatchewan First Nations Emergency Management, SK, 2021)

Community-led workshops provided First Nations communities with tailored FireSmart training, often supported by grant funding. Each session was adapted to local conditions, cultural contexts and community priorities. Topics included home ignition zone assessments, vegetation management, emergency planning and community engagement strategies.

Lesson learned: Locally delivered training increases participation and adapts content to community realities. When workshops are led by trusted community members and tailored to local needs, they are more effective, inclusive and sustainable.

*Note: The case studies included on this page are for informational purposes and were not supported by the Green Municipal Fund.

Additional resources

Wildfire risk reduction course (Province of British Columbia) – This 3.5-hour online course introduces participants to the fundamentals of wildfire risk reduction, including key concepts, stakeholders and mitigation strategies. It also covers funding opportunities and planning tools to support community-level fire preparedness and resilience.

FireSmart 101 (FireSmart) – This one-hour online course introduces individuals and communities to the core principles of FireSmart. It covers basic wildfire behaviour, home protection strategies and community-level actions to reduce fire risk in a clear and accessible format.

Indigenous youth wildfire training (National Indigenous Fire Safety Council) – This nationwide program offers hands-on and online training for Indigenous youth aged 15–30. It includes S-100 and S-185 certifications, pump and hose operation, and fire safety skills. This initiative builds local firefighting capacity while supporting cultural knowledge integration.

Explore more wildfire resilience activities

Learn about other wildfire resilience project types and how they can support your community:

Return to the Wildfire Resilience Toolkit for Municipalities 


Related toolkits

GMF offers additional toolkits to support municipalities facing different climate risks. 


Glossary

FireSmart: A national Canadian program offering practical guidelines to reduce wildfire hazards around homes and communities

Cultural fire co-management: Collaborative fire stewardship that integrates Indigenous burning practices with municipal fire management

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): Indigenous understanding of ecosystems, fire behaviour and land stewardship passed through generations

FireSmart champions: Local volunteers trained to promote FireSmart practices and support peer-to-peer learning in their communities

Incident awareness: Understanding wildfire risks, emergency alerts and response protocols to act quickly during fire events

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Pagination

Subscribe to