Municipalities across Canada are navigating complex challenges and require solutions that can address multiple issues at once. This webinar explores how sustainability projects can deliver lasting socioeconomic benefits—and how you can leverage this knowledge to strengthen your Green Municipal Fund (GMF) grant and loan applications.

This session will help you understand the multi-solving approach to local sustainability projects that not only reduce diverse sources of greenhouse gas emissions, but also improve budget management, climate resilience, biodiversity and social well-being. Our panelists highlighted practical examples of net-zero builds and retrofits that have delivered both environmental and socioeconomic benefits, and explained how you can integrate these concepts into your GMF funding applications.

What you will learn:  

  • How multi-solving and co-benefits in sustainability projects can help meet broader municipal goals.
  • Key insights into GMF application requirements related to multi-solving and co-benefits, and how they can improve your application’s success and your project’s outcomes.
  • Ways to incorporate socioeconomic benefits into net-zero builds and retrofits.
  • Real-world case studies of municipalities leveraging sustainability for environmental and social gains.

Speakers:  

  • Dr. Anabela Bonada, Managing Director, Climate Science, Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation, University of Waterloo
  • Marcos Alejandro Badra, Program Manager, Circular Economy, City of Richmond, British Columbia
  • Maria Adelaida Fernandez, Socio-Economics Benefits Specialist, Green Municipal Fund
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

 

This webinar delves into actionable fleet electrification strategies essential for municipalities pursuing net-zero by 2050. As communities increase efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, this session equips you with the frameworks needed to secure funding, build charging infrastructure and foster EV adoption especially in small and rural communities.

Hear from GMF experts, municipal leaders and industry specialists as they showcase real-world experiences, proven best practices and targeted resources that demonstrate how to achieve cost-effective, climate-resilient approaches to support a smooth transition in communities of all sizes.

This webinar was delivered in English with simultaneous interpretation in French.

Watch the webinar recording to learn more about:

  • The opportunities and challenges of municipal fleet electrification, including real-world adoption strategies.
  • Best practices for procuring and installing EV charging infrastructure.
  • The financial and environmental benefits of fleet electrification, with strategies to support cost-effective, long-term sustainability.
  • Real-world success stories from municipalities leading the way in EV adoption.
  • Practical steps your municipality can take to plan and implement a smooth and climate-resilient fleet transition.

Panelists:

  • Donna Reardon – Mayor, Saint John  
  • Benoit Lacroix – CEO, ReliON  
  • Ashley Smith – Owner & Managing Director, Fundamental Inc  
  • Noémie De Vuyst – Advisor, Programs Outreach, Green Municipal Fund
  • Kevin Loughery – Director of Saint John Transit   

The Green Municipal Fund (GMF), funded by the Government of Canada, helps municipalities electrify fleets with expert support and funding for cost-effective, climate-resilient net-zero solutions.
 

Municipal Fleet Electrification

We support projects at various stages of development through grants and loans. Funding amounts are based on total eligible costs. Further details on eligible costs are provided on individual funding pages.

Municipal Fleet Electrification

Reduce fuel costs and modernize your fleet with funding for electric vehicles

Read more

Study: Municipal Fleet Electrification

Funding to plan your municipality’s transition to electric vehicles

Read more

Capital project: Municipal Fleet Electrification

Funding to install charging stations and transition your municipal and transit fleet to electric vehicles

Read more
Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$150,000
  • Grants for up 80%* of eligible costs to a maximum of $150,000 for program design studies

 

Open To:

Municipalities with PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy)-enabled legislation in:  

  • Ontario
  • Nova Scotia (flood-related resiliency measures only)
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Saskatchewan
  • Yukon

Eligible applicants include:

  • Canadian municipal governments (e.g., towns, cities, regions, districts and local boards)
  • Organizations applying in partnership with a municipal government, such as:  
  • Municipally owned corporations
  • Regional, provincial or territorial organizations delivering municipal services
  • Not-for-profit organizations
  • Those who are already recipients of Community Efficiency Financing funding for the implementation of PACE financing model
  • Those who have previously set up community efficiency financing, either through GMF or outside of GMF funding and are interested in resiliency add-ons

Note: To qualify, applicants must have an existing or previously designed municipal financing program for home energy upgrades. The proposed study must build on this foundation to include climate adaptation measures.  

 

Expected Output:

Design studies that explore the expansion of municipal financing programs that help homeowners invest in climate adaptation measures—such as flood protection, wildfire mitigation and extreme weather resilience—alongside financing for energy efficiency improvements, like those covered under GMF’s Community Efficiency Financing initiative. These studies will assess how adaption-focused financing can be integrated with or complement existing home energy retrofit programs to provide a holistic approach to climate resilience.  

 

Application Deadline:

The deadline to submit a full application for this funding is January 15, 2026

 *Eligible applicants may receive an additional 10% grant funding by demonstrating a commitment to program excellence. This includes integrating Reconciliation, anti-racism, equity and inclusion into their program design, along with one or more of the following:  

  •    An inclusive engagement strategy
  •   A Build Back Better plan for post-loss support

Why create a program design study? 

A program design study helps municipalities lay the groundwork for a successful climate adaptation financing program. It ensures the program is financially viable, well-structured and aligned with homeowner needs before launching a full-scale program.  

A program design study helps you:  

  • Identify homeowner needs and assess which climate risks impact them most
  • Evaluate homeowner interest and financial barriers to participation
  • Model uptake and cashflow to build confidence in program sustainability
  • Align with municipal policies and develop a roadmap for implementation
  • Build stakeholder and community support to strengthen buy-in and drive participation
  • Partner with private sector lenders to supplement municipal investment
  • Determine what policies, partnerships and administrative tools are needed to ensure success

A well-designed program design study is key for a successful financing program and serves as a critical foundation for applying for our soon-to-be released Residential Resilience Financing Capital Program funding.  

What we fund

Residential Resilience Financing provides funding to help Canadian municipalities develop and implement financing programs that make it easier for homeowners to invest in climate adaptation solutions to protect their homes from extreme weather, flooding, wildfires and other climate risks.  

Municipalities can use this funding to:  

  • Explore options for expanding an existing or in-development Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program to include climate resilience measures
  • Build on a current energy efficiency study to assess local climate hazard impacts and identify opportunities for incorporating resiliency retrofits
  • Define the structure of a financing program that would offer homeowners affordable financing and incentives for retrofits that strengthen their homes against climate hazards (such as storm-resistant roofing, sump pumps and fire-resistant materials)
  • Determine the program delivery model, financing terms, and eligibility criteria for participants
  • Establish the models to leverage private sector investment to expand funding opportunities
  • Identify opportunities to leverage private capital and align with other funding sources or incentive programs
  • Engage key stakeholders—such as insurers, contractors and equity-deserving groups—to inform program design and ensure long-term relevance and reach

For a full list of program design considerations, including eligible measures, funding models and evaluation planning, please refer to the application guide.  

What your project needs to achieve

To qualify for funding, your program design study must demonstrate how it will:  

  • Support homeowners in implementing climate adaptation measures
  • Align with municipal priorities for climate resilience and community safety
  • Build on an existing or previously designed municipal financing program for home energy upgrades by expanding it to include climate adaptation measures.
  • Leverage private investment, where applicable to expand funding opportunities
  • Integrate with existing municipal programs, such as energy efficiency financing
  • Determine resilience measurements of success
  • Identify the target audience (geographic area, types of homes, occupant demographics) and provide a rationale supported by a community level technical climate hazard assessment  
  • Determine the program financing model, process flow and delivery mode.
  • Document outcomes of engagement process with key stakeholders/rights holders or include a plan to fulfill commitments for engagement.
  • Develop a plan for program monitoring and evaluation.

For a full list of program design considerations, including equity integration, de-risking strategies and program administration elements, please refer to the application guide.

Eligibility requirements

Eligible costs

See application guide.

What your project must include

Eligibility criteriaDescription
Financing model
  • Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
  • Other financing models, if approved by GMF
Building typesExisting, low-rise residential properties (e.g. detached, semi-detached, row housing and similar)
Categories of qualifying resiliency improvements

GMF does not specify particular types of measures to be utilized by a local program. Rather, the applicant is to define an “eligible measures” list pursuant to the following climate hazards:

  • Rain and flooding
  • Extreme heat
  • Severe weather (wind, hail)
  • Wildfire
  • Drought

A sample list of eligible measures, as well as measures ineligible for financing in Resiliency PACE, is presented in Appendix D of the application guide.

Home assessmentGMF recognizes the absence of a standardized assessment tool for resiliency home retrofits (such as EnerGuide). GMF will defer to the applicant to determine how to assess hazard vulnerability at the household level and prescribe retrofit activities.
Study requirements
  • Existing energy efficiency PACE program, currently operational or under development
  • Justification or rationale for a selected climate hazard
  • Focus on at least one of the hazards identified in the Categories of qualifying resiliency improvements section above
  • FCM’s evaluation will favour programs that offer the greatest potential for:
    • Equitable design by incorporating the principles of reconciliation and anti-racism, equity and inclusion
    • Inclusive engagement, providing equal opportunities to participate in decision making
    • A plan to incorporate post-loss resiliency building support
Exclusions

Be advised that programs with any of the following characteristics are deemed ineligible:

  • Pilot programs
  • Programs geared to new construction
  • Programs that do not involve municipal participation and buy-in
  • Programs in jurisdictions that do not have PACE enabling legislation supporting financing of resiliency measures
  • Programs that do not have a financing component (e.g. incentive-only programs)
  • Programs exclusively targeted at financing for non-residential buildings (e.g. commercial, industrial)
  • Programs that do not address at least one of the hazards identified in the Categories of qualifying resiliency improvements section above

Required documents

To apply for GMF funding, you must submit:

  • Completed full application form  
  • Project workbook  
  • Project team organizational chart and resumes  
  • Evidence of municipal support: resolution from council or letter of support signed by the mayor on behalf of council, or by the chief administrative officer or city manager, describing the municipality’s commitment to this application
  • A letter from each confirmed funding source specifying the amount of cash contributed and/or the value of any staff time or in-kind contributions to the study or program  
  • Letter of confirmation of consultation with your provincial or territorial government 

Readiness check 

Question 1

Do you represent a Canadian municipality from Ontario, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, or Yukon?

Question 2

Which of the following best describes your organization?

For profit entities are not eligible. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Question 2a

Do you have a partnership in place with a Canadian municipality?

Skip

Question 3

Does your municipality have an existing, under development, or previously designed municipal financing program, for home energy upgrades?

Skip

Question 3a

Does your municipality have an existing, under development, or previously designed municipal financing program, for home energy upgrades?

Skip

Question 4

Is the goal of your program design study intended to expand your existing efficiency program by including resiliency upgrades? 

It sounds like you have the start of an excellent project. We’d like to continue the conversation.  

The next step to confirm your eligibility is to contact a GMF representative. They’ll provide you with next steps and support you in starting your application.

Contact a GMF representative to schedule an appointment:

18774170550

gmfinfo@fcm.ca

Book a meeting with a GMF representative

No recommendation

This funding is intended to support Canadian municipal governments and eligible partners from Ontario, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, or Yukon. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey.

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, your organization cannot access this funding because you are not partnered with a municipality on this project. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that the municipality is a recipient of a municipal financing program for home energy upgrades. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that the municipality is a recipient of a municipal financing program for home energy upgrades. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that your program design study includes resilience strategies. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

This funding is intended to support Canadian municipal governments and eligible partners from Ontario, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, or Yukon. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey.

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, your organization cannot access this funding because you are not partnered with a municipality on this project. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that the municipality is a recipient of a municipal financing program for home energy upgrades. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that the municipality is a recipient of a municipal financing program for home energy upgrades. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 

No recommendation

Unfortunately, this funding requires that your program design study includes resilience strategies. While this funding isn't the right fit, GMF offers other funding, training and resources to support communities in their adaptation journey. 

Check out our resources for practical, hands-on tools and knowledge that can support your project efforts and address municipal challenges.

Discover other GMF funding offered to local governments to fund infrastructure and support a net-zero Canada.

Sign up for FCM Connect to stay informed about GMF funding, resources and training. 


Application process

Below is an overview of the application process to reach a funding decision.

Phase 1: Review the funding webpage and complete the Readiness Check to determine if you could be eligible for funding and to learn about next steps. Please see the application guide for complete instructions.

Phase 2: Contact a GMF representative

After you have completed the Readiness Check and have determined your eligibility, please contact a GMF representative to discuss your project and obtain the necessary information to complete the next steps.  

Contact a GMF representative to schedule an appointment:

1-877-417-0550

gmfinfo@fcm.ca

Book a meeting with a GMF representative

Phase 3: Prepare your application

To apply for funding, you must submit:

  • A Completed full application form  
  • Project workbook  
  • Project team organizational chart and resumes  
  • Evidence of municipal support: resolution from council or letter of support signed by the mayor on behalf of council, or by the chief administrative officer or city manager, describing the municipality’s commitment to this application
  • A letter from each confirmed funding source specifying the amount of cash contributed and/or the value of any staff time or in-kind contributions to the study or program  
  • Letter of confirmation of consultation with your provincial or territorial government  

Phase 4: Full application submission

Once you have completed the required documents, you will submit them, along with any required supporting documentation. Only applications that are complete when the application window closes will be considered for this round of funding.

It is important to note that even if a project is deemed eligible to move forward with a full application, it does not guarantee that the project will be approved for funding.  

As you work though the required documents, please refer to the application guide and contact a GMF representative if you have any questions.

Phase 5: GMF internal review

Once the application form is submitted, a GMF project officer will be assigned to your file and will review your application for accuracy and completeness. Officer will work with you to resolve any remaining questions and be your point of contact throughout the remainder of the application and funding-decision process.  

Phase 6: Funding decision

GMF will use robust review processes to make funding decisions.  


How to apply

  • Complete the Readiness check.
  • Download and review the application guide.  
  • Contact a GMF representative to discuss your project and receive the application form at gmfinfo@fcm.ca or 1-877-417-0550.  
  • Review the required documents to ensure you have the necessary information needed to complete them.
  • Complete the application form and submit along with the other required documentation as outlined in the application guide before the deadline.  

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Learn more about the Local Leadership for Climate Adaptation initiative. 

Discover the ways GMF is supporting local governments and communities to become more resilient to climate change impacts.

Across Quebec, aging infrastructure and rising costs are driving municipalities to invest in cost-saving, sustainable solutions. Since its inception in 2000, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has supported 289 projects in the province, delivering over $209 million in funding and generating $205.6 million in GDP.

Among them, municipalities of all sizes—from small-town Saint-Valérien to Quebec City—are using GMF funding to transform aging community buildings into more comfortable, cost-efficient, and climate-resilient spaces.

With insights from GMF experts, tips from the City of Candiac, and inspiring success stories, discover how building energy upgrades could benefit your community. 

Q&A | What’s working: Trends and recommendations for Quebec’s community buildings  

As the first points of contact for GMF’s Community Buildings Retrofit initiative in Quebec, Pascale Thériault and Athia Kabanguka are strategic allies helping municipalities navigate and access our funding opportunities.

Their role offers them a unique perspective, explored below as they reflect on emerging trends and local priorities in municipalities across Quebec. 

 

 

Pascale Thériault

Advisor, Programs Outreach, Quebec, Green Municipal Fund

 

Athia Kabanguka

Advisor, Programs Outreach, Green Municipal Fund

 

What challenges are Quebec municipalities trying to solve by upgrading their community buildings with energy retrofits?

Community building energy retrofits are helping Quebec municipalities reduce operating costs (particularly energy costs over the longer term), better equip their buildings for extreme weather conditions, and cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to reduce their carbon footprint and achieve Quebec’s aim of carbon neutrality by 2050.

What type of community buildings are often prioritized in Quebec for energy retrofits, and are there differences between rural and urban areas?  

Sports facilities like indoor pools and skating rinks are often the priority in Quebec for energy retrofits. They tend to be the most energy-intensive and emit the most GHGs, making them key to efforts to reduce operating costs and meet municipal climate objectives. Libraries and community centres are also candidates due to their frequent use and potential for energy improvement.

In rural areas, buildings are often multipurpose—a single location can serve as a community hall, library and recreation centre. However, rural municipalities have limited access to the technical and financial resources they need to carry out major renovations. This presents a challenge, but also an opportunity to maximize GMF’s impact through grants and loans, as well as our Learning Centre and Community Buildings Retrofit Advisory Service

If a municipality with limited resources wants to start a community building renovation project, where should it begin?

The first step is to better understand the energy consumption of the building. This requires an energy audit, which is essential to get a clear picture of the current situation and to identify possible improvements in areas such as heating, insulation or LED lighting.

Once they have this analysis, the municipality can assess the cost of each measure, the expected energy savings and the financial impacts in order to prioritize its interventions based on its objectives and resources. Site surveys, energy modeling and scenario development are eligible expenses under the Study: Pathway to Green Buildings offer when integrated with the complete energy analysis.

Municipalities with limited resources can strategically stagger these efforts over several years and integrate them into municipal asset management. This way the retrofits can be coordinated with normal equipment replacement, while moving towards more efficient, comfortable and sustainable buildings. 

Who generally gets in contact with you about energy retrofits, and who manages and coordinates the projects in Quebec municipalities?

The first contact is sometimes made with municipal councillors or mayors. They then put us in touch with the general managers or technical departments to initiate more substantive discussions on eligibility.

We often talk to the general managers, since they are authorized to approve grant applications and budgets. Projects are then usually coordinated by project managers in technical departments or energy or sustainability advisors. They are responsible for tendering, overseeing work and handling technical aspects.

We also communicate regularly with external consultants, such as energy experts. They are often the people who conduct energy audits and help local governments prepare their funding applications. Finance departments are also involved in assessing the financial feasibility of capital projects.

What are the most popular low-cost retrofits that help Quebec municipalities reduce their energy use and operating costs?

Even with a limited budget, simple and effective measures can improve the energy performance of buildings. Adjusting the temperature based on how the premises are used or training maintenance staff in best energy practices can generate immediate savings. Replacing lighting with LED bulbs is also a popular, low-cost solution that effectively reduces electricity costs.

Some municipalities are installing simple automation systems to better control lighting, heating and ventilation. This reduces waste and makes it easier to track consumption. 

For example, these simple, cost-effective actions could help reduce GHG emissions from a building located in climate zone 6 (where winters are moderately cold):

  • Better heating and ventilation programming to save 45 tons of CO₂ per year.
  • Ventilation on request to save 32.5 tons of CO₂ per year.
  • Optimization of pool management (temperature, humidity) to save 18 tons of CO₂ per year.
And what about more ambitious or long-term projects—what are Quebec municipalities choosing to invest in with GMF’s support?

Most municipalities are investing in improvements to building envelopes, for example, adding insulation to walls, roofs and foundations, and replacing windows with more efficient designs. In addition to reducing energy consumption, these efforts improve user comfort.

They’re often accompanied by upgrades to mechanical systems, such as heat pumps or heat recovery ventilation systems. Some municipalities go further by integrating renewable energy sources like solar photovoltaic panels or geoexchange systems.

What advice would you offer to Quebec municipalities considering energy retrofits for their community buildings?
  • Build a multidisciplinary team at the outset: Involve building managers, financial services, and internal and external experts (engineers, architects, energy consultants) to ensure effective coordination and rigorous follow-up.
  • Establish an inventory of municipal buildings: With an inventory you can assess the possibility of renovating a portfolio of buildings rather than just one and optimize investments at the municipal level.
  • Conduct an energy audit: An energy audit identifies the main energy losses and helps prioritize the most cost-effective measures for reducing operating costs and GHG emissions.
  • Take an integrated approach: Focus on projects that address several issues at once, such as improving energy performance, reducing drinking water consumption, preserving biodiversity and opting for sustainable materials.
  • Involve the community: Consult with the buildings' users to ensure that retrofits meet their needs and maximize social benefits.
  • Conduct a feasibility study and plan carefully: Rigorous planning takes time, but it reduces the risk of costly errors and maximizes the long-term gains. If this step sounds intimidating, feel free to contact other municipalities or our team for referrals or support.
  • Promote the project benefits: Document and communicate savings and the benefits for the community (comfort, safety, accessibility, etc.) to demonstrate the project’s value to your citizens and decision-makers as well as inspire other initiatives.
How does the renovation of several community buildings in a single funding application (portfolio of buildings) benefit Quebec municipalities?

First, carrying out energy audits, feasibility studies or retrofits for several buildings at the same time reduces unit costs (for studies, consultations, equipment). It saves time and money.  

It also increases the project’s energy and climate impact, which makes it more attractive to funding bodies and may open the door to greater funding.

This approach also makes it possible to standardize equipment and management practices, making it easier to maintain buildings over the long term.

Finally, it helps accelerate the achievement of GHG reduction targets and develop internal energy efficiency expertise.

Do you have questions about community building financing?

Contact our Outreach team:

 

Q&A: How Candiac will significantly lower energy costs in just 5 years

Photo of a sports complexe in Candiac, Quebec

 

 

Karine Lehoux

Director, Department of Ecological Transition and Innovation, City of Candiac, Quebec

  

In 2023-24, the City of Candiac conducted a feasibility study on four community buildings to identify the most impactful retrofits—both in reducing emissions and energy consumption. They made the most of GMF’s support: securing a $200,000 grant, following our study guide, and using the Community Buildings Retrofit Advisory Service. The work also brought together multiple departments, highlighting the value of collaboration in local climate action.

In the Q&A below, Karine Lehoux, Director of the Department of Ecological Transition and Innovation, City of Candiac, shares insights and lessons learned from the process.

 

What objectives or challenges are you seeking to address through energy retrofits, and how did you prioritize which buildings to include in the project?

It all started with the City of Candiac’s climate plan, which enabled us to determine the energy consumption of municipal buildings. The GHG inventory showed that municipal buildings are responsible for 40% of corporate GHG emissions. We selected the buildings that emit the most GHGs and can be retrofitted in the coming years.  

What types of retrofits will be done as a result of the feasibility studies, and why were these improvements chosen?

It is estimated that the building improvements could save up to 219 tons of CO₂ emissions and reduce electricity consumption by 18,000 kWh. The project therefore targets not only reductions in GHG emissions, but also, first and foremost, energy efficiency. The Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document from the Green Municipal Fund was very helpful for choosing improvements because we could see different scenarios and opportunities.    

Energy innovations (solar photovoltaic panels) are being incorporated into the project to improve their resilience and contribute to Quebec’s necessary energy transition.    

To reduce GHG emissions as well as achieve greater savings and a shorter payback period (PBP), we will be making improvements to the Complexe Sportif Candiac, which has two indoor rinks, and the Complexe Roméo-V.-Patenaude, where many community events are held.

Retrofits for the Complexe Sportif Candiac:  

  • replacement of rooftop units with heat pumps
  • heat recovery from condensation and the addition of a heat pump water heater
  • heat recovery measure to heat the snow pit
  • addition of CO2 sensors to regulate the fresh air supply
  • solar PV installation for electricity generation

Retrofits for the Complexe Roméo-V.-Patenaude:  

  • replacement of rooftop units with heat pumps
  • addition of solar collectors to preheat outdoor air

Two other buildings will also benefit from energy retrofits, and we are prepared with our feasibility study (which was conducted from May 2023 to December 2024).

What key results will emerge from the retrofits, and how will they affect the quality of life of Candiac residents?

This project goes well beyond asset management and embodies a high-level vision that encompasses decarbonization, energy efficiency, and social and community responsibility, as well as the search for funding opportunities through energy savings. This is an integrated project designed to benefit the community. Our approach demonstrates rigorous and responsible financial management of municipal buildings for the benefit of all.  

The in-depth building analyses have identified several measures that can increase energy efficiency and which incorporate significant decarbonization strategies.  

In accordance with the targets to be achieved, and based on current data and assumptions:

  • The improvements to the Complexe Sportif Candiac will generate annual savings of up to $41,000 over five years, or up to $620,400 over 20 years, and an 84% reduction in GHG emissions compared to 2018.
  • The improvements to the Complexe Roméo-V.-Patenaude will generate annual savings of up to $17,231 over eight years, or up to $200,000 over 20 years, and an 82% reduction in GHG emissions compared to 2018.

Significant decarbonization strategy: A corporate GHG reduction of up to 20%  

Among the planned measures, the use of heat recovery from condensation to heat water and the snow melt system are notable for having a positive impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions without requiring major investments. The approach combines energy efficiency and environmental responsibility in an economically viable way.

The proposal to replace roof units with heat pumps equipped with thermal wheels is a promising solution for achieving decarbonization targets.  

Grants are available to cover some of the additional costs associated with these new units, making it a financially advantageous option.

Scenarios for reducing greenhouse gas emissions were also proposed in this study.  

They provide the City of Candiac with a clear road map to effectively plan future work. Taken together, these measures and scenarios position the city on the path to more sustainable energy management in line with current environmental imperatives.

How has the GMF Community Buildings Retrofit Advisory Service supported your efforts, and were there times when its advice was particularly helpful?  

First of all, thank you! The advisory service was very well received internally. Having direct access to an independent French-speaking professional who could review the study calculations and confirm the choices proposed by the company reassured us and enabled us to move forward quickly.

We were also able to get our proposal for the call for technical plans and specifications approved. The city doesn’t have any staff members who specialize in this type of work. Having an expert at our side made us confident in our decisions and enabled us to move forward quickly and enjoy greater credibility.   

What advice would you give to other Quebec municipalities considering energy retrofits for their community buildings?

First tip: The GMF Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document is bold and comprehensive. It guides the municipality, shows the overall impact of the work on energy consumption and reduces the workload.    

Second tip: Do the feasibility study even if the improvements are planned for a more distant future. You’ll be ready at any time, make the most of your investments and will be able to direct the work to achieve specific objectives.  

Third tip: Set aside time to work on this in-house!

 

Normand Dyotte, maire de la Ville de Candiac, Québec

This project is about more than just asset management—it’s about the big picture. It combines decarbonization, energy efficiency, community and social responsibility, funding opportunities and energy savings.” 

- Normand Dyotte, Mayor of the City of Candiac, Quebec

 

Inspiring stories from municipalities big and small

A new life for a cherished old church in Saint-Valérien


In the heart of small-town Saint-Valérien, with fewer than 1,000 residents, community members saw potential in an unused church. With a vision to turn it into a vibrant community centre, they used GMF funding to implement energy upgrades to make the building more affordable to operate and more environmentally sustainable.

Through retrofits like replacing the oil furnace with a biomass system and improving insulation, they aimed to cut energy use by 98% and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 21 tonnes a year.

Beyond energy savings, the project created local jobs, boosted tourism and brought new life to the town’s core. Today, the former church is a welcoming hub for recreation, learning and connection.

Église de Saint-Valérien

 

Revitalizing Gabrielle-Roy Library in Québec City


After decades of service, the Gabrielle-Roy Library needed upgrades for energy efficiency, comfort and accessibility. The City of Quebec took on a major retrofit project, improving thermal performance with enhanced insulation and installing high-performance mechanical systems, LED lighting and a heat recovery ventilation system.

These upgrades helped reduce energy costs while creating a more inclusive and welcoming space. Despite budget and construction challenges, the result will be a brighter, more modern library that better serves the community.

Bibliothèque Gabrielle-Roy à Québec_Future

 

GMF grants and loans are available to help municipalities make public buildings more energy-efficient, all while creating local jobs and reducing energy bills. Apply for funding today, regardless of where you are in the energy-efficiency process.

Funding options

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Related resources

Factsheets: Community Buildings Retrofit initiative

How to retrofit existing community buildings to lower GHG emissions and extend their life cycle.

Read more

Community Buildings Retrofit Advisory Service

Free, expert advice to help you upgrade your local facilities

Read more

Webinar recording: How to get a project started, tips for small francophone communities

Examples of small francophone communities who have found creative ways to access funding and launch ambitious projects.

Read more

E-learning courses: Tackling energy use in your municipal and community buildings

Learn how to improve the energy performance of buildings in your municipality

Read more

Guide: Taking your indoor swimming pool to net zero

Key measures and lessons learned to help you build a net-zero plan

Read more

Guide: Taking your indoor ice rink to net zero

Learn how to develop an actionable roadmap to net zero ice rinks

Read more

Risk Icon

As climate change continues to affect communities across Canada, its impacts on public infrastructure threaten the ability of local governments to deliver essential services effectively. Recognizing the need to act is the first step; however, it's often difficult to know where to begin. Planning your climate risk assessment and adaptation process helps create a clear path forward to protect your community from climate impacts.

 

This tip sheet will help you answer:  

  • What should I include in the scope for my climate risk assessment?
  • What information do I need and where can I find it?
  • How do I find the people with the right skills to take on this work?
  • What resources will help me do this work? 

Getting started 

Define the scope of your work.

How can you figure out the right scope for your climate risk assessment to make sure it fits your community's needs and addresses the most important areas? 

This involves tailoring your approach to your community’s unique context and priorities by outlining:

  • your community’s needs and objectives -> Why are you undertaking this climate risk assessment and adaptation planning work?
  • the climate hazards and scale of your work -> What will you be assessing and planning for?
  • the approach you will use to assess risks -> How will you go about it?

Here are some tips to help you get started. 

  1. Clarify your community’s need(s) and objective(s).

Climate risk assessments and adaptation plans are not one-size-fits-all. Clearly defining your community’s needs and objectives helps ensure a more focused, effective and well-supported process. 

Reflect on these questions Example responses 
Why are you undertaking the climate risk assessment and adaptation planning work? 
  • Our community is experiencing increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events.
  • We want to ensure the long-term sustainability of our local economy and natural resources.
  • We have to comply with regional, provincial/territorial and/or national climate policies and regulations. 
What objectives does your municipality aim to achieve by developing and implementing your adaptation plan?
  • We want to reduce the vulnerability of our community’s critical infrastructure (e.g., facilities, structures and assets critical to community function) to climate impacts.
  • We want to enhance public awareness and preparedness for climate-related risks.
  • We want to integrate climate resilience into all municipal planning and decision-making processes. 
What decisions do you want to inform? What outcomes are you seeking from this process?
  • We are aiming for improved community resilience to climate change.
  • We hope to identify capital projects or operational activities to manage climate impacts, so we can update our capital plan and financial plans.
  • We want increased collaboration and engagement with local stakeholders and residents on climate initiatives.
  • We plan to develop actionable strategies and projects that address identified climate risks.

 

  1. Identify what climate changes are affecting your community.

Are you aware of any climate changes that your community is facing now or that may be a concern in the future? These might include any of the following:

  • wildfire
  • extreme rainfall
  • extreme heat
  • extreme wind
  • drought
  • sea level rise and storm surge
  • permafrost degradation
  • erosion
  • other
  1. Choose the scale of the climate risk assessment.

In addition to identifying the climate hazards to include in your risk assessment and adaptation plan, the scale of your climate risk assessment refers to the extent of the physical boundaries, service areas and/or thematic considerations you will include. For example, you might set a:

  • physical boundary: This refers to the geographic area covered by the assessment, such as the municipal boundary or specific neighbourhoods within the municipality.
  • service boundary: This involves focusing on specific municipal services or departments, such as corporate services, culture and tourism, fire services or environmental services.
  • asset boundary: This involves focusing on specific physical assets within the municipality that are critical to its functioning.
  • hazard boundary: This means focusing on specific climate hazards that your community is currently or has experienced, such as wildfires or flooding.
  • thematic boundary: This refers to different themes or areas of focus, such as the environment, public health, infrastructure or the local economy.  

A community-wide assessment covering multiple areas, services, assets and themes provides the most comprehensive understanding of local climate risks. However, the scale of the risk assessment can vary between municipalities, depending on factors such as available resources, capacities, constraints and the purposes or goals of the risk assessment and adaptation plan. When choosing the scale for your climate risk assessment, consider:  

  • broader scale: For example, this would include all municipal assets and services as well as areas such as local economy and public health. A broader scale can provide a comprehensive understanding of the community-wide impacts of climate hazards, but it requires more effort and resources to go beyond a high-level scan.  
  • narrower scale: For example, this would include considerations only for a single asset or service area. A narrower scale can help you be more detailed but may miss broader climate vulnerabilities in your community.  
  • combination: For example, you could start with a high-level, community-wide assessment and follow with more detailed assessments for high-risk areas.

Further guidance on choosing the scale of your climate risk assessment can be found in:  

  1. Consider how you will define and measure the risks.

Your approach to the climate risk assessment should make sense for your municipality and the decisions you’re trying to inform. Consider whether you will take a top-down or bottom-up approach.

  • top-down: Should your assessment be led by a small group of experts or consultants who gather and analyze community data? This method is the quicker and less complex option but could miss valuable insights from diverse perspectives, increasing the risk of overlooking certain impacts or community needs.
  • bottom-up: Should you involve many people, including community members and stakeholders, in developing the assessment? This approach takes more time and effort but helps to gather diverse input and can build trust with community members and stakeholders who can help with implementation.

Does your municipality already have an approach to assessing risks? For example, has your community evaluated the risk of infrastructure failure through an asset management risk assessment? There may be opportunities to incorporate climate risks into your existing approaches. If not, there are many existing risk assessment frameworks and resources detailing the process. See Tip sheet: Start assessing your local climate risks for further details. 

 Gather relevant and trustworthy climate change information.  

This is about identifying and gathering the data you need to understand local climate change and its impacts on your community.  

When you’re new to the topic of climate change, how can you collect the information you need?  

Finding sources of information that are trustworthy and relevant to your community can be difficult, especially if staff have limited expertise related to the topic. Here are some tips to help you get started.

  1. Consider what types of information will be used in your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.

For guidance on selecting the types of information to include in your climate risk assessment and adaptation plan, refer to Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts.

  1. Take stock of what information you already have.

Not all climate information comes from resources specifically related to climate change. For example:  

  • Climate projects may already be identified in your asset management plan.
  • Most at-risk infrastructure may already be identified in your asset inventory.
  • Your municipality’s official plan may have insights into natural hazards.
  • Service requests can inform you about asset damage effects.

Neighbouring jurisdictions may have also already done climate work that you can draw on. For example, there may be a regional or district climate action plan other municipalities can pull from.

Additionally, climate information is not the only type that matters in a climate risk assessment and adaptation plan. For example, socioeconomic and organizational data are also important. You might find this useful information in community plans or initiatives. For example:

  • Your housing needs report may highlight vulnerable areas due to housing issues.
  • Insurers often have information on the impacts of damaging events.
  1. Identify credible sources of climate information.

Identifying credible sources of climate information involves considering who published it, when it was published and last updated, and where it is relevant.  

Who
  • reputable organizations: Look for data published by respected organizations. For example, the Climate Atlas of Canada is an interactive tool developed by the Prairie Climate Centre and designed to help you learn about climate change and explore its impact on communities.
  • academic institutions: Data from universities and research institutions is often peer-reviewed.
  • government agencies: Data from national, provincial and regional government agencies is credible. For example, ClimateData.ca is an online climate data portal developed by a group of government, academic and research organizations.  
  • local expertise: Rely on insights from local sources, including local and regional First Nations, Métis, Inuit and urban Indigenous Peoples communities and organizations, as well as other local jurisdictions, institutions, organizations, communities of practice and/or stakeholders.
  • transparency: Use sources that are open about their approach to collecting and analyzing data.
When
  • recent: Data should be current to reflect the latest observations and projections.
  • regular updates: Sources that are regularly updated remain relevant and accurate over time.
Where
  • geographic specificity: Ensure the data is specific to your location or region. Data that is too broad (e.g., national or international) may not accurately reflect local conditions and vulnerabilities.
  • localized studies: Look for sources that provide localized studies or allow you to set your location to access tailored data.  

 

For additional sources of regional climate data, refer to the “Library of climate resources” from the Canadian Centre for Climate Services. 

Bring together the needed knowledge, skills and experience.

This is about finding people within and outside your organization who can contribute to climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.  

When it seems like you need so many perspectives, how can you identify and bring together the right mix of skills, knowledge and experience to complete a climate risk assessment?

Here are some ideas on how to get started.

  1. Consider who might have the skills, knowledge, and experience you need.  

Start by finding those within your organization who have relevant skills, knowledge and experience. The GMF Guide: Municipal climate change staff has a comprehensive summary of departments or staff roles and the type of support or resources they might offer.  

You can also find valuable skills, knowledge and experience from those outside of your organization, such as:

  • qualified consultants for specialized skills
  • academic institutions for expertise and resources
  • community organizations (NGOs, community groups) for local climate information
  • government services like the Climate Help Desk from Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada

Identify which stakeholders will need to be involved and how you will involve them. In many cases, the success of your engagement will depend on established relationships, for example, with local and regional First Nations, Métis, Inuit and urban Indigenous Peoples communities and organizations.

Community members have valuable and unique expertise from their lived experiences of climate change. This includes youth, the elderly, people with disabilities, people of colour, Indigenous individuals and others. Listening to and amplifying their voices is a critical part of making your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning inclusive and representative of your community. Additional resources on undertaking engagement that is informed by Reconciliation and anti-racism, equity and inclusion are outlined in Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts and Tip sheet: Start climate adaptation planning.

  1. Build your climate adaptation team.

Once you have identified individuals within and outside your organization who can support your climate risk assessment and adaptation planning, it can be helpful to bring these people together as a team dedicated to climate adaptation efforts. For example, you can:  

  • Identify a team leader: choose someone to coordinate the team’s efforts and keep things organized.
  • Define a purpose: clearly outline what the team aims to achieve in your community.  
  • Schedule regular check-ins: set up regular meetings, even if they are informal, to discuss progress and next steps.  
  • Outline roles and responsibilities: make sure everyone knows their role in the team and what their responsibilities are.  

Additional resources on building your climate adaptation team can be found in the Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee’s (PIEVC) Large Portfolio Assessment Manual (LPAM) and High-Level Screening Guide (HLSG)

 

Next steps

Once you have prepared for your climate risk assessment and adaptation plan — with a clear scope, an understanding of the data you need and the skills in place to take it on — you will be in a good position to identify local climate impacts. For support on getting started on this next phase of work, read Tip sheet: Start identifying local climate impacts.

Explore the Climate-Ready Communities Assessment Tool for additional insight and support in preparing for climate risk assessment and adaptation planning. You can use the tool to evaluate your existing climate adaptation efforts, pinpoint areas for improvement and chart a clear plan for strengthening your community’s adaptation efforts.

Note: Several of the approaches referenced in this tip sheet are from “Guidance on Good Practices in Climate Change Risk Assessment” (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2021).

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Featured Resources

Climate-Ready Communities Assessment Tool

Assess your community’s climate adaptation efforts and discover actionable steps to improve resilience

Read more

Course: Building climate resilience with asset management

How to protect municipal infrastructure from climate hazards

Read more

Factsheet: Why equity matters in municipal climate adaptation

Explore the importance of taking on equity-centred climate adaptation work

Read more

Please note: This webinar recording includes English captions only and does not contain English audio.

Urban forests are critical for a resilient, healthy and equitable community. Communities of all sizes can be the champions of change in urban forestry. Whether you are starting from scratch or reshaping existing plans, it is critical to learn what a robust urban forest management program entails and how this may vary depending on community size. 

Learn from a panel of experts in environment, forest and climate energy as they discuss what makes a robust urban forest management program and how to get started. From policies to protect existing trees to strategies for planting and growing new trees in areas that need them most, this webinar will provide practical insights on how small and large municipalities are advancing their urban forest priorities.

Speakers:  

  • Lauren Clark, Climate and Energy Program Manager, Town of Mahone Bay
  • Simon Wilmot, Forest and Environmental Officer, City of Charlottetown
  • Alexandre Fichon, Analyste en environnement, Ville de Longueuil

This webinar is well suited for:

  • Municipal elected officials
  • Urban forestry practitioners  
  • Parks and recreation staff
  • Planners
  • Asset management staff
  • Climate change / sustainability staff 

Watch the webinar


This webinar was created in partnership by Tree Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund for the Growing Canada’s Community Canopies initiative, which is delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and funded by the Government of Canada. 

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

 

Facing an affordable housing crisis and rising to the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Waterloo Region Housing (WRH) has undertaken its first net-zero community housing build. 

Located in Southern Ontario, WRH is expected to complete its newest community housing development at 420 Kingscourt Drive this summer. The project features a variety of energy-efficient design elements as well as tenant amenity spaces to foster a sense of community. The 73-unit building’s energy use will be 50 percent lower than average Canadian residential building, meaning tenants will not only enjoy an affordable, comfortable home, but also benefit from greatly reduced energy costs. 

The project is so exceptional that it was named a winner of a 2024 Sustainable Communities Award.

In this webinar recording, you’ll hear an inspiring story about how a local government with no previous experience constructing net-zero buildings ended up with an award-winning project that proudly incorporates affordability, energy efficiency and community engagement.

Watch the webinar recording to learn:

  • A detailed background behind WRH’s project and their goals and challenges, including a walkthrough of their approach, project scope and funding model.
  • The value of collaboration with other departments and obtaining council support.
  • The innovative pilot of the Community Benefits Program, which provides training to help recruit, engage and retain a diverse construction labour force.
  • Lessons learned from project and WRH’s next steps, including at least five additional affordable housing redevelopment projects in the area.

Speakers:

  • Tristan Wilkin – Supervisor of Affordable Housing Development, Housing Services; Region of Waterloo
  • Brad Pick – Senior Project Manager (Facilities-Large Capital); Region of Waterloo

This webinar was delivered in English with French simultaneous interpretation. 

FCM’s Sustainable Affordable Housing (SAH) initiative is delivered through our Green Municipal Fund and funded by the Government of Canada.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Please note that applications closed on October 17, 2025.

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$125,000

Grant up to 50%* of eligible costs

Open To:

The following organizations are eligible for GMF funding: 

  • Canadian municipal governments (e.g., towns, cities, regions, districts, and local boards)
  • Local government transit agencies
  • An Indigenous community is an eligible lead applicant if they are partnering with a Canadian municipal government on an eligible project, or if they have a shared service agreement with a Canadian municipal government related to municipal infrastructure, climate change or adaptation.
Expected Output:

New or improved active transportation infrastructure along school routes in your community, including quick-build or permanent features such as pathways, sidewalks, bike lanes, crossings and safety enhancements—along with knowledge and capacity to implement these improvements effectively. 

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT 

As a grant recipient, you’ll join a dynamic two-year journey designed to gain the skills, knowledge and connections to successfully plan and implement safe and active transportation projects in your community. You will receive expert training and connect with national leaders in active school travel to help drive lasting change. 

As part of the cohort, you’ll receive support to: 

  • strengthen community engagement with proven strategies to gain school and stakeholder buy-in
  • navigate challenges, policies and regulatory hurdles
  • sharpen your project planning skills, including funding, infrastructure and implementation
  • build collaborative relationships across sectors to support long-term success
  • learn to track progress and measure impact, including GHG reductions and long-term impacts.
Application Deadline:

The pre-application deadline is October 17, 2025. Please note that the application intake will begin mid-summer.

Eligible Costs:

See list of eligible costs

This funding is intended primarily to support the design and installation of active transportation infrastructure for safe routes to school. The majority of funding should be allocated to these costs. 

* The following applicants may qualify for a grant of up to 80 percent of eligible project costs: 

  • Municipalities (or their partners) with a population of 10,000 or under;
  • regional governments or groups of municipalities where the average population of the member municipalities is 10,000 or under;
  • eligible Indigenous communities; and,
  • northern communities

Northern and eligible Indigenous communities that are applying to GMF for the first time may qualify for a grant of up to 100 percent of eligible costs. 

The North is defined as the three territories and the northern extent of seven provinces. This includes portions of the following provinces defined by Statistics Canada codes: Newfoundland and Labrador (10), Québec (24), Ontario (35), Manitoba (46), Saskatchewan (47), Alberta (48) and British Columbia (59).

What we fund

We fund projects that aim to increase walking, biking and rolling to school through new or improved active transportation infrastructure and road safety improvements. Recipients will be supported during the planning, design and implementation stages through the peer-learning support program. Costs associated with all these projects stages are eligible for funding.

Projects must consist of a capital investment (i.e., constructing, altering or improving physical assets) and may additionally include policy measures (e.g., speed limit changes) and educational strategies. Policy measures and educational strategies alone are not eligible for funding. Eligible projects may include:  

  • Quick-build installations for active transportation, such as bollards, planters, paint, concrete surfboards and other removable treatments arranged to pilot new pathways, crosswalks, curb bump-outs, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, speed deterrents, etc.
  • New or improved infrastructure for active transportation, such as separated bicycle lanes, more pedestrian-friendly intersections, pathways, crosswalks and connections to active transportation networks and transit networks.
  • Improved active transportation infrastructure, including design considerations in which there may be no net gain in kilometres of infrastructure, but include improvements in the quality of infrastructure that encourage greater usage. 
  • New or improved design and safety features and facilities that promote active transportation, such as storage facilities, lighting, greenery, shade, benches, crosswalks, speed bumps, fences, signage and automated speed enforcement.   
PXL_2024073...4226623.jpg

Photo courtesy of Halifax Regional Municipality 

 

Safe activities

Photo courtesy of Halifax Regional Municipality 

Application requirements 

Applications must: 

  1. Identify one or more routes to a primary or secondary school (or schools) as the target area for the capital project and propose an infrastructure solution to address safety-related challenges that create a barrier to active school travel for children. Grant recipients will have an opportunity through the learning program to explore various infrastructure solutions and confirm or adjust their approach.
  2. Demonstrate that their project will enable a significant proportion of students to walk, bike or roll to/from key destinations within 2kms of the school (e.g. home, recreation centre, transit stops) by identifying the size of the school population and the percent of students impacted
  3. Provide proof of a partnership between the school(s) of interest (e.g., via school administration and/or school district) and the local government applicant that indicates a willingness to collaborate on the proposed project (e.g., through a letter of support).  
  4. Demonstrate they have complete jurisdiction over the roads, paths or land expected to be directly impacted by the project, or permission from an entity or person with jurisdiction or ownership to undertake the project.  
  5. Demonstrate that the proposed project is a municipal commitment or part of a municipal plan or strategy. For example, the project is identified in a municipal, transportation, school or active transportation plan, school travel plan and/or be identified in an approved or proposed council resolution (that will be considered by Council prior to the project start date). 
  6. Demonstrate that projects have the potential to lead to GHG reductions through a reduction in vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) by shifting trips to active transportation modes (walking and cycling) or other solutions that decrease vehicle use and GHGs. To help applicants set their VKT reduction targets, GMF will provide support during the application process, including guidance on estimating impacts. We recognize that available data may vary, so applicants can use a combination of the following sources. If data is incomplete, GMF can also provide default values to assist with estimates: 

    1. Usage data (e.g., school travel surveys, census data, traffic counts)
    2. Mode shift estimates (e.g., peer benchmarks, survey results) 
    3. Trip characteristics (e.g., average trip to school length) 

       

    All approved recipients will have a chance to refine their baseline data and set more accurate targets through a peer-learning program, where they will also receive guidance on monitoring and reporting project outcomes. 

What your project needs to achieve 

Only projects that meet the criteria on this page are eligible. Please note that we consider several factors in making a funding decision. We strive to fund the most innovative and impactful initiatives as well as support communities of all sizes, so not all eligible projects will be approved for funding. Applicants must commit to actively participating in the peer learning support program to be considered for funding.   

Preference will be given to initiatives that: 

  • will improve safety of active transportation users, with a focus on child and youth safety
  • are linked to a pre-established school travel plan
  • will connect to, or extend, existing active transportation networks or pathways
  • consider accessibility in the project design and implementation
  • are led by a multidisciplinary team, representing key roles (e.g., transportation, planning, recreation, climate, public health, parks, transit)
  • are conducted in collaboration with key implementation partners (e.g. parent-teacher associations, non-profit organizations and public health organizations active in safe routes to school)
  • are led by or created in collaboration with equity-deserving groups or with an Indigenous community
  • contribute to the testing or demonstration of treatments, approaches and practices that are innovative
  • youth and/or children contribute to, or lead, aspects of the project development and implementation (e.g. engagement, design, installation, monitoring and evaluation)
  • demonstrate a strong integration of multi-solving approaches such as:
    • maximizing environmental and socio-economic benefits (e.g., improved accessibility; use of recycled, natural or low-carbon materials; promoting green buffers or pollinator-friendly landscaping, promoting child-friendly neighbourhoods)
    • advancing Reconciliation, equity, diversity and inclusion by addressing transportation challenges for low-income or equity-deserving groups or low-income communities

Equity considerations 

GMF recognizes that many urgent social issues are interrelated, and that climate action and sustainability initiatives need to be designed to ensure fair distribution of benefits and burdens, across all segments of a community and across generations. Projects will be assessed on their potential to result in improved socio-economic outcomes and a more equitable distribution of benefits and burdens among the community, for present and future generations. While projects can be eligible without incorporating these considerations, preference is given to projects that:

  • integrate principles of Reconciliation, anti-racism, equity and inclusion
  • apply inclusive community engagement practices
  • implement social procurement practices, for example buying from local vendors, small businesses, diverse businesses or social enterprises.
  • generate other socio-economic benefits, such as improved accessibility, improved outdoor spaces and opportunities for inclusive employment and apprenticeship.

As you develop your project, consider the following questions:

  1. How can you design an engagement approach that would enable you to consider the diverse needs, experiences, and voices of all stakeholders and rights holders in this project?
  2. Which equity-deserving groups might benefit the most, and/or be burdened, directly or indirectly, by this project? How are these groups positively or negatively impacted?
  3. Are there opportunities to address or mitigate negative impacts?
  4. Are there opportunities to rectify existing or potential biases, discrimination, or exclusionary practices in your project planning, design, funding, and implementation?
  5. How can you maximize the socio-economic benefits that your project generates?
  6. How can you leverage your procurement practices to generate more positive social, economic and environmental outcomes within your community and region? 

 

Please note that applications closed on October 17, 2025.

 

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Read the guide for more information on creating a successful application.

Does your community want to enhance biodiversity and better manage its natural assets? This factsheet explores how thoughtful tree planting and urban forest management can restore and connect habitats to enhance urban biodiversity, ecosystem health and ecosystem structure. 

Biodiversity in the urban forest

Trees are critical for supporting biodiversity. Tree species like white oaks, hackberries and beaked hazelnut sustain local wildlife by producing acorns, berries and nuts that feed bird and mammal species. Other trees, like eastern white cedars or eastern redbud, provide shelter for birds or produce flowers that support native pollinators. Trees also support local watersheds by preventing erosion in ravines and along rivers and improving water quality.

While individual trees provide important benefits for wildlife, it is vital to maintain and protect patches of undisturbed forests and other areas with high tree density, particularly in urban and peri-urban environments (areas located on the outskirts of cities and towns). These patches are composed of mostly native trees and other vegetation that have co-evolved and formed symbiotic relationships with native wildlife. Conserving these spaces, along with planting new trees, helps to preserve important habitat and maintain native species populations. 

Threats to urban forests 

Many communities around the world have established themselves in areas with high biodiversity. However, as cities and towns expand and land is cleared to make room for development, existing ecosystems like wetlands, forest and grasslands can be significantly altered or replaced entirely.

Today, many urban ecosystems, including urban forests, have been degraded from the impacts of development. This shows up as habitat loss, invasive species, pollution and poor soil quality. A degraded ecosystem can lead to native plant species not regenerating as they should and wildlife populations declining.

Urban forests also suffer from fragmentation. Cities and towns often contain patches of forest and other ecosystems that are isolated from one another by human-made barriers like roads, commercial buildings and housing developments. These barriers prevent wildlife from crossing between different patches which, over time, can lead to a decline in biodiversity and lower wildlife populations.

Restoring habitat through tree planting and management

Ecosystem restoration is the process of returning a degraded or converted ecosystem to a healthy, functional and sustainable state (i.e., what existed prior to human intervention). This process includes activities such as removing invasive species, planting native vegetation, remediating soil and improving water quality.  

In urban and peri-urban areas, tree planting is a highly effective method for restoring habitats and conserving biodiversity. Planting trees helps re-establish canopy structures, supports wildlife, prevents invasive species and promotes native plant diversity. 

Case study: Restoring the Black Oak savannah in the City of Toronto

The Black Oak savannah is a rare and diverse grassland ecosystem in Ontario that relies on fire to thrive. Periodic controlled wildfires in these ecosystems benefit native plants and animals by reducing invasive species, stimulating native plant regeneration and restoring wildlife habitat. For centuries, Indigenous communities have managed the savannah through practices like traditional burns. However, urban development and colonial practices such as fire suppression have largely destroyed or vastly changed much of the Black Oak savannah from its original state.  

A large patch of Black Oak savannah still exists in several parks in the City of Toronto, including High Park. In 1995, the city determined that the trees in the park were nearing the end of their life expectancy and new trees were not regenerating to replace them. The ecosystem was not functioning optimally, and its long-term viability was at risk.  

The city has since begun restoration efforts by partnering with local Indigenous communities to conduct annual traditional and prescribed burns, targeted plantings of black oak, and careful monitoring and removal of invasive species. Over time, these actions have led to natural regeneration within the ecosystem, illustrating the value of planting and careful management in ecosystem restoration. 
Learn more about traditional and prescribed burns in the City of Toronto. 
 

Improving habitat connectivity in and out of the urban forest 

Habitat connectivity is the extent to which distinct patches of habitat are connected, which can influence how or if animals and plants can travel between different habitable areas. Increasing habitat connectivity in and around urban areas can help mitigate the effects of isolated patches and improve biodiversity.  

Efforts to promote biodiversity often concentrate on large natural habitats outside of urban environments. For example, the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative is a collaborative effort to protect and connect landscapes across more than a million square kilometres in the United States and Canada. These types of projects connect large swathes of habitat through land agreements and the establishment of corridors that allow wildlife to move safely across large tracts of land.

But smaller natural urban spaces and peri-urban spaces, like municipal parks and other greenspaces, can also support considerable biodiversity, promoting species and ecosystem diversity by reducing fragmentation. Trees planted on municipal streets and in parks can create green corridors that provide temporary food and shelter for birds and pollinator species searching for higher-quality habitat. Careful analysis and planning, including mapping existing greenspaces, is crucial to identify and prioritize sites that can enhance connectivity.

Case study: City of Surrey biodiversity strategy and green infrastructure network

The City of Surrey, BC, has taken significant steps to conserve biodiversity with a dedicated municipal strategy endorsed by its council in 2014. Surrey has integrated objectives from its biodiversity conservation strategy into its official community plan, climate change action strategy and urban forest management strategy, among others, and has developed a set of design guidelines to support neighbourhood-level approaches to increasing biodiversity. 

Part of this work involves the development of a green infrastructure network connecting 3,900 hectares of natural green corridors and greenspaces across the city. The network is based on three core principles:  

  • Preserve large core habitat areas, such as forest stands or parks (“hubs”).
  • Ensure connectivity between habitat areas (“corridors”).
  • Provide a diversity of habitat features throughout Surrey (“sites”).  

The city uses a combination of tools to protect public and private land, including development permit requirements, parkland dedications and land acquisition. 

Learn more about the City of Surrey’s biodiversity initiatives. 
 

Strategies for restoring urban forests and connecting habitats in your community 

Effective planning for biodiversity in and around municipalities is increasingly important as urban areas expand. Good planning can help achieve conservation goals and support the ecosystem functions and services on which our communities depend.

Municipalities can leverage various tools to protect and restore urban forests and to ensure habitat connectivity. Below are initial strategies that your municipality can explore to plant new trees and to manage existing treed spaces in a way that promotes biodiversity. 

  1. Identify and assess areas that need to be restored and connected

    Creating an inventory is an important first step to determine ideal locations for restoring and connecting habitat. Your inventory should include municipal parks and other public or privately-owned land that can support additional tree planting. Inventories can be created through a combination of on-the-ground searches, existing public park information, satellite imagery and community engagement. They can be stored and visualized using tools like geographic information system (GIS) software or iTree (for more details on these, review our factsheet on urban forestry technology and tools).

    After creating your inventory, analyze potential sites based on factors like proximity to an existing natural area, size of existing greenspace, existing biodiversity and presence of invasive or at-risk species. Biodiversity assessments can be performed on sites with existing natural greenspaces like woodlots or ravine areas by trained biologists, foresters or ecologists.  

    You can also use your inventory to determine opportunities to improve connectivity between existing greenspaces. The distance between two existing parks or greenspaces or the presence of existing green corridors (e.g., streets with continuous canopy or vegetation cover) nearby are measures that can help prioritize locations for connectivity.  

    Key resource: The San Francisco Estuary Institute’s Making Nature’s City Toolkit outlines possible assessment criteria for evaluating urban biodiversity. It includes information about the size, shape and distance between patches of greenspace, width of corridors, habitat diversity, presence of native vegetation and more. 

  2. Implement tree planting and other restoration projects

    After conducting your parks and plantable spaces inventory, you can begin plans to maintain or enhance biodiversity in your community. The outcomes of your inventory assessment will inform which sites you prioritize to plant new trees, create green corridors and otherwise support habitat restoration and connectivity.  

    Always seek expert advice when planning new projects. Your team should include experienced biologists, Knowledge Keepers, ecologists or foresters with ecosystem restoration and connectivity knowledge. Wherever possible, use native trees and vegetation to better support native pollinators and make sure to select species that can tolerate future climate conditions (e.g., drought-tolerant species or species not currently threatened by pests or diseases). When prioritizing sites, consider projects that would improve or create critical habitat for species at risk.  

    After restoration work is complete, it is important to have a long-term monitoring plan for the site. Invasive species are a constant threat to natural spaces and are easiest to remove when found early.  

    Consider how your community can be involved in data collection, monitoring and restoration efforts. Community members, naturalist groups and other local environmental organizations are often aware of natural spaces in need of restoration activities like tree planting or invasive species removal. Ensuring community members are aware of and able to participate in the planting and restoration projects can increase their impact and success. Involve local Indigenous communities by seeking guidance from Knowledge Keepers and prioritizing input from Indigenous leaders and community members during engagement.

    You can also plan events to encourage community members to record and share wildlife sightings in public databases. For example, municipalities and other community groups can participate in Nature Conservancy Canada’s annual Big Backyard BioBlitz

     

  3. Protect existing natural spaces through local policies and planning

    The easiest way to protect biodiversity in your community is to protect existing natural spaces. Restoring former natural areas is often more costly and work intensive than maintaining existing spaces. Municipalities can explore options to create protected areas on municipal land and partner with other landowners and/or orders of government to establish protections.

    To maintain your existing natural spaces, you can create a biodiversity strategy or plan. Municipal biodiversity strategies are comprehensive long-term plans to protect and enhance local natural spaces. They provide an outline your municipality can follow to increase biodiversity and stop important habitat loss.  

    Ensure municipal development plans and land use policies are prioritizing the protection and enhancement of local biodiversity. Consider the different tools at your disposal, such as zoning or development permit bylaws, that can be used to protect existing natural areas and enhance biodiversity. 

    Key resource: The Green Bylaws Toolkit is a comprehensive resource for land use planners and decision-makers that explains how to create bylaws and other policy tools that protect and enhance the natural environment and green infrastructure.  

Other municipal examples

  • The City of Nicolet, QC, collaborated with Habitat to assess ecological connectivity in the region and create an action plan for developing an ecological corridor. This included activities like tree planting and wetland preservation.  
  • The City of Victoria, BC, has listed improving ecological connectivity as a dedicated outcome in its urban forest master plan. Strategies include using tree planting and management to connect larger natural areas and provide corridors for wildlife.
  • The City of Edmonton, AB, uses an ecological network approach to conserve its natural areas. A natural connections strategic plan and a natural area systems policy outline specific principles, roles and responsibilities for implementation.
  • The City of Toronto, ON, released a biodiversity strategy to enhance the quality and quantity of biodiversity and increase awareness of nature in Toronto. This has included numerous restoration projects and public engagement initiatives, such as biodiversity booklets for different groups of species (e.g., Trees, Shrubs and Vines of Toronto). 

Next steps


This resource was created in partnership by Tree Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund for the Growing Canada’s Community Canopies initiative, which is delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and funded by the Government of Canada.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

About this guide

The Integrating Equity Principles Within Community Efficiency Financing Programs: A Guide for Canadian Municipalities and Partners is designed to help municipalities create home energy retrofit financing programs that work for everyone. Developed as part of the Green Municipal Fund's (GMF) Community Efficiency Financing (CEF) initiative, this guide provides practical tools and strategies to make energy efficiency programs more accessible, fair and impactful.

Why inclusion matters

Energy efficiency programs have the power to reduce energy costs, improve home comfort and cut greenhouse gas emissions. Yet not everyone has been able to access these benefits. Barriers like upfront costs, language differences and a lack of awareness often exclude those who need these programs the most.

This guide is built on the principle that fairness doesn’t mean treating everyone the same—it means recognizing people’s unique starting points and equipping them with the tools they need to succeed. By adopting this approach, municipalities can create programs that:

  • Help more households participate in energy retrofits
  • Reduce energy costs for those who need it most
  • Build healthier, more resilient communities

By addressing these challenges and designing inclusive programs, municipalities can ensure energy efficiency benefits reach everyone in their communities.

What you’ll find in the guide

  • Clear steps to success: Learn how to incorporate inclusive practices at every stage of your program, from planning to evaluation.
  • Tools to remove barriers: Explore ways to make your programs more accessible, whether by reducing financial risks, tailoring outreach efforts, or offering targeted supports.
  • Real-life examples: See how other municipalities, like Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, are leading the way with programs that prioritize community needs and deliver real results.

Who is this guide for?

This guide is for municipalities, local governments and their partners involved in home energy retrofit financing. Whether you’re just starting out or refining your approach, this resource will help you design programs that create meaningful change and reach more people.

Get started

Making your energy retrofit program more inclusive doesn’t require overhauling everything at once. This guide offers practical actions you can take, no matter where your community is on its journey. Even small steps can make a big difference.

Download the guide.
 

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Pagination

Subscribe to