Underbrush

The Campbell River Community Plan charts a course to preserve the environment, develop the economy and manage growth. It calls for sustainable policies on housing, infrastructure, transportation, energy and emissions management, and community services. By integrating the three pillars of sustainability — society and culture, the economy and the environment — the 50-year plan will allow the community to address global warming, changes in the resource sector and challenges posed by an aging population. The city partnered with three First Nations in a planning process that involved more than 1,500 members of the community. 

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Goals and targets guide land use, ecosystems, water, a skilled work force, social equality and other priorities

  • A sustainability checklist guides rezoning and development permits

  • Green procurement strategy helps reach sustainability goals. 

  • Redevelopment of brownfield sites for a range of residential and commercial uses.

  • Seventy per cent of residents living within a 20-minute walk of stores and other amenities by 2020.

  • Council-to-council meetings held between the City of Campbell River and the Wei Wai Kum, We Wai Kai and Homalco First Nations.

  • Citizens engaged through a wide variety of events and activities, including community workshops and open houses.

Challenges

  • Partnerships with local First Nations — essential to the success of the sustainability plan — were complicated due to long-standing grievances.
  • The three First Nations communities had not been included in previous official plans.
  • The city had to draft a suite of supporting plans for transportation, agriculture, energy and emissions, and solid waste.

Lessons learned

  • The council-to-council meetings with local First Nations were an important starting point.
  • With so many consultants involved, it was important to have a single, accountable project manager. Keeping public consultations focused on the practical steps for the community was essential.

Resources

Partners and Collaborators

Project Contact

Ross Blackwell
Land Use Manager
City of Campbell River
T. 250-286-5748

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

Almost every Canadian municipality is home to a brownfield site. A brownfield is an abandoned, vacant, derelict or underutilized commercial, industrial or institutional property where past actions have resulted in actual or perceived contamination or threat to public health and safety and where there is active potential for redevelopment.

Because brownfield sites are often contaminated, they tend to be undervalued and underused. Once contamination is dealt with, municipalities gain valuable land that can be used for a wide variety of activities. The cleanup of a contaminated brownfield site is called "remediation."

Find out how your community can bring these valuable properties back into productive use and increase revenues, manage environmental risk, improve public health and revitalize neighbourhoods.

Learn more

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

The City of Parksville has developed a new Official Community Plan to address issues such as smart growth, climate change, downtown revitalization, sustainable tourism and shoreline protection.

The plan is built around sustainability goals that will guide future land use and development policies. These goals include support for mixed-use development and compact housing, alternatives to automobile transportation, increasing water and energy conservation and lowering GHG emissions.

The city plan will support the development of a "live-work" culture, protect the community's natural heritage and encourage residents to buy locally and to explore the local environment. 

With the new Official Plan in place, Parksville is poised for its future as an attractive, economically vibrant community with sustainable amenities and services for permanent residents and tourists alike.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Reduce per capita GHG emissions to 33% of 2007 levels by 2020
  • Reduce municipal CO2 emissions by at least two tonnes annually
  • Factor climate change adapta­tion into all new development
  • Support a diverse local economy
  • Build productive relationships with local economic sectors 
  • Encourage local purchasing
  • Support mixed land-use to pro­mote a "live-work" environ­ment
  • Provide opportunities to live, work and play in the city, to reduce travel and improve health
  • Offer alternatives to automobile transportation
  • Develop a more walkable community

Challenges

  • Many members of the public found the legal requirements for an Official Community Plan difficult to understand and were frustrated that some of their suggestions could not be incorporated.
  • It is difficult to involve busy young adults in the community. The youngest residents attending public hearings were in their mid fifties.

Lessons learned

  • Manage public expectations. The content of an OCP is strictly governed by the Local Government Act. Explain to stakeholders how this limits the plan to land use or community development.
  • Hire an independent facilitator or consultant to manage the committees, encourage open discussion and avoid getting caught up in political issues.
  • Build flexibility into the planning process. There will almost certainly be delays and requirements for additional resources.

Resources

Partners and collaborators

Project contact

Blaine C. Russell, 
Director of Community Planning
City of Parksville, B.C. 
T. 250-954-4660

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

People strolling on an unpaved path in the forest

The City of Mississauga has a master plan to instill environmental consciousness in its corporate DNA. The plan outlines actions the city can take to meet the environmental goals in its 2009 strategic plan.

That means developing a transit-oriented city, making neighbourhoods more livable and connected, and helping residents and businesses make environmentally sustainable decisions. The plan has three categories of actions for the city to implement over the next decade: ways to set an example, ways to encourage others, and ways (like regulations and bylaws) to compel others. The plan includes indicators to measure the city's environmental progress

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Conserves energy and water and reduces waste by greening city facilities

  • Reduces dependence on fossil fuels by using clean, renewable energy (solar, wind, biofuels)

  • Reduces reliance on cars by expanding public transit

  • Preserves or restores natural environments

  • Attracts businesses and ensures prosperity by security and cost stability of renewable energy sources

  • Creates walkable, connected neighbourhoods with reliable public transit and cycling routes

  • Promotes population health through clean air and active lifestyles

Challenges

  • Too short a time frame for the project.
  • Building confidence among city staff that the master plan would support their programs, rather than dictate priorities.
  • Changing habits among city staff and in the wider community.
  • Finding the money to properly implement the plan.

Lessons learned

  • Create a realistic schedule.
  • Allocate sufficient resources, including a special events planner, for the public consultations. These events raise awareness of and build support for the plan.
  • Budget for an editor and designer to make a reader-friendly final plan.

Partners and collaborators

Resources

Project contact

Mary Bracken
Project Lead, Living Green Master Plan
City of Mississauga, ON
T. 905-615-3200, ext. 4918

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

The City of Corner Brook developed a 10-year integrated municipal sustainability plan (IMSP) that serves as a hybrid document, combining the goals and objectives of an integrated community sustainability plan with the legislative authority of a municipal plan. It includes a vision, goals and objectives for long-term development, addressing the five pillars of sustainability: environmental, economic, social, cultural and governance. It includes specific policies, regulations and implementation targets for the physical design and development of the city and identifies opportunities for partnership and collaboration. In force under the province's Urban and Rural Planning Act, the IMSP replaces Corner Brook's 1994-2004 Municipal Plan. The full plan is expressed in two documents: the Integrated Municipal Sustainability Plan and the Development Regulations.

To develop the plan, the city completed an extensive community consultation process, including public meetings and communication with stakeholder groups. Provincial government departments were also consulted. Municipal staff worked closely on the regulatory aspects of the plan to ensure that it would align with regional and provincial policy instruments.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Urban greening strategies and policies
  • Urban intensification and infill development policies to promote more efficient land use
  • Solid waste management and reduction strategies
  • Intensification policies support redevelopment of brownfield sites
  • Re-zoning encourages mixed-use development within municipal service areas
  • Flood risk mitigation policies and regulations and storm water retention measures support climate change adaptation
  • Policies to extend the pedestrian system, support active transportation modes and link to recreational destinations
  • Mix of housing types encouraged in new developments to increase affordable housing options
  • Universal accessibility policies

Challenges

  • The process of working remotely with consulting firms located in other provinces was a challenge. Modern communication technologies cannot replace the added value of being located in the same community and the efficiency of holding face-to-face meetings to resolve issues quickly.
  • The time required to complete the plan was longer than anticipated because of the complexity of prepare a hybrid document that combines sustainability goals with regulatory policies that must align with provincial legal frameworks.

Lessons learned

  • Identify the appropriate type of plan for the community (anything from a simple statement of visions and objectives to a detailed, legally binding implementation document) by considering how the plan will be used and assessing the resources available for its preparation.
  • Collaborate closely with the consultant preparing the plan, to ensure that every detail fits the local community.
  • Allow adequate time for municipal staff to complete multiple revisions of development regulations so that the regulations are fully aligned with related policies.

Resources

Partners and collaborators

  • The city consulted several provincial government departments (including the Department of Municipal and Intergovernmental Affairs), municipal staff, residents and numerous community representatives of service groups, seniors, youth, environmental groups, economic boards and community development associations.

Project contact

Colleen Humphries
Supervisor of Planning
City of Corner Brook, NL
T. 709-637-1553

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

This is part of a series of case studies on wastewater projects funded by the FCM's Green Municipal Fund. Each case study provides technical information, project details and tips on best practices.

Project overview

The Town of St. Andrews, NB, upgraded its wastewater treatment plant to meet environmental standards, improve quality of life for residents and create capacity for growth. To increase capacity while minimizing costs and the environmental impact of construction, the town chose to make one of its two existing facultative treatment ponds deeper and add a lining to the pond, rather than build a new pond. The town also introduced submerged aeration and UV disinfection systems and installed a monitoring and control system. The upgrades are part of a broader, ongoing wastewater plan that includes separating the town's storm sewer connections from its sanitary collection system and encouraging citizens to remove foundation drains from their sanitary sewer service lines. 

Figure depicting the  Town of St. Andrews, NB , wastewater project timeline.  Figures depicting the population served by Town of St. Andrews, NB, wastewater initiative and its budget.  Figure depicting the improvement in water quality resulting from the Town of St. Andrews, NB, wastewater initiative.

Reasons for the project

  • The town needed to increase the capacity of its wastewater treatment plant to allow for growth.
  • Some equipment was reaching the end of its service life.
  • The system was not in compliance with Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations and standards set by the New Brunswick Department of Environment and Local Government.

Innovative aspects of the project

  • The upgrades will lead to significant improvements in the watershed and allow the community to grow in a sustainable manner.

Best practices and key lessons

The municipality's experience with this project demonstrates some best practices and key lessons that can inform similar projects.

Engage early and broadly

  • The town met with the provincial Department of Environment and Local Government early on to gain support, expedite the permitting process and learn from its expertise.
  • During the scoping stage, the town engaged with local residents to explain the project and its benefits and obtain feedback. The town ended up modifying the design to address residents' concerns.
  • For a small municipality, obtaining community buy-in and support is particularly important when a project involves borrowing funds or increasing user fees to pay for upgrades.

Conduct background research

  • As a smaller community, it was important that the town do its own research, rather than simply rely on a consultant, in order to explore a full range of options and make the best choices for the community. The research helped the town identify new technologies, estimate costs and learn from other municipalities' experiences.

Include contingencies in the project budget to avoid schedule delays

  • The project was delayed because of weather, contractor delays and cost overruns.
  • The bids received by the town were significantly higher than anticipated in the project budget (close to $4 million compared to the budget of $3 million). This was compounded by the fact that the project had been pre-approved by the Building Canada Fund for funding that would cover two-thirds of the original (lower) budget. The town was responsible for all the additional costs, which would have doubled its financial contribution to the project. To move forward, the town worked with the contractor and a design consultant to modify the project design and schedule, reducing costs without sacrificing the integrity of the project.

View of lagoons for Town of St. Andrews, NB, wastewater treatment facility.
View of lagoons for Town of St. Andrews, NB, wastewater treatment facility. (Credit: Town of St. Andrews)

Project benefits

This project yielded a number of environmental, social and economic benefits. 

Environmental benefits

  • Decreased energy use and greenhouse gas emissions: The plant upgrades have yielded a 26 per cent reduction in annual power consumption.
  • Improved effluent quality: Water quality now meets regulatory standards.
  • Reduced chemical residuals: With the introduction of ultraviolet disinfection, water discharges are now cleaner.
  • Protected biodiversity and ecosystem: The quality of the discharge has improved, benefitting the surrounding ecosystem and leading to greater aquatic health.
  • Decreased noise pollution: The previous mechanical aerators created an extremely loud howling sound that disturbed neighbours and people in the nearby campground. Replacement of this system has reduced noise pollution in the community.
  • Decreased odour pollution: The improvements to the treatment process have eliminated the odours perceived by local residents and pedestrians.

Social benefits

  • Protection of public health: The quality of the discharge has improved, benefitting the natural environment and, in turn, improving human health.
  • Improved staff health and safety: The upgraded wastewater treatment plant meets health and safety regulations, creating safer working conditions for municipal staff.
  • Community beautification: The project improved the aesthetics of the treatment site by making the facility more compatible with its surroundings.
  • Improved service delivery: The upgraded plant has a greater water treatment capacity.

Economic benefits

  • Decreased operating costs: The plant's upgraded technology is more efficient, reducing operating costs.
  • Decreased maintenance costs: The new equipment will be less likely to break down, resulting in less downtime and reduced maintenance costs.
  • Increased potential to attract new residents and businesses: The increased wastewater treatment capacity will allow the town to attract new growth and support sustainable development.
  • Local business development: The improved effluent water quality may contribute to the return of shellfish harvesting in the local area, which has been suspended for many years due to poor water quality in the Chamcook Lake and the larger Passamaquoddy Bay. In addition, increased presence of larger marine life, such as sea birds and whales, will attract visitors and may represent a source of income for local tour boat operators.


Pie chart depicting the funding breakdown for the Town of St. Andrews, NB, wastewater initiative.

Technical highlights

This project was a new facility. Technical highlights are current as of 2013.

Municipal population: 1,889

Urban/rural: rural

Treatment: Aerated lagoon

Disinfection

  • Before: None
  • After: UV disinfection system — 136CFU/100 ml

Biosolids management: Ponds dredged periodically

Annual average daily flow (AADF)

  • Before: 2.1 MLD (million litres per day)
  • After: 2.5 MLD

Design capacity

  • Before: 1.3 MLD
  • After: 2.1 MLD (9.2 MLD is what the system could handle if the recorded influent data were used as a model)

Per cent of total capacity used for AADF

  • Before: 161 per cent 
  • After: 104 per cent 

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)

  • Before: 17 mg/L
  • After: 8.2 mg/L

Project contact information

Chris Spear
Treasurer/Deputy Clerk
Town of St. Andrews, NB
T. 506-529-5250

Dan Bartlett
Water & Sewer Technician
Town of St. Andrews, NB
T. 506-529-5255

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

Learn from the City of Nanaimo's experience in reviving its downtown and waterfront

Downtown waterfronts are at the heart of many Canadian communities. For many, waterfronts were once bustling engines of a past industrial economy; some now sit vacant — void of the productivity that once supported their communities. Often derelict and sometimes contaminated, these brownfield sites create barriers between citizens and their waterfronts — and there are often challenges for redeveloping these sites. 

Watch this webinar to find out how municipalities can work through partnerships to move beyond these barriers. Speakers will describe how partnerships have been central to efforts in the City of Nanaimo, BC, in reconnecting its shoreline and downtown communities. Since 2000, the city has collaborated with local businesses, property owners, the Snuneymuxw First Nation, the Government of Canada and the Province of BC. FCM's Green Municipal Fund has supported Nanaimo's brownfield redevelopment strategy to help guide this progress.

You'll learn:

  • How visioning and planning has set Nanaimo's course toward implementing successful brownfield redevelopment initiatives
  • How strong partnerships with stakeholders are vital to brownfield redevelopment
  • How the city set its risk tolerance in acquiring a contaminated site  

Speakers

  • Bill Corsan, Manager, Real Estate — City of Nanaimo, BC
  • Darren Moss, Chair of Planning, Design & Development Committee — Downtown Nanaimo BIA, and Professional Engineer, Tectonica

Request this resource

Would you like to receive this resource by email? Contact us today. In your request, please include the full name of the resource.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

This is the first article in the three-part series Tips for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade.

The series provides a framework to help municipalities develop innovative and sustainable wastewater system projects. The articles highlight the three key phases of a project and draw on proven lessons from a dozen of the successful wastewater treatment studies and projects that FCM's Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has funded.

In this article, we cover the first phase: Project scoping and stakeholder engagement. Follow the tips below to develop a project scope and stakeholder engagement strategy that will work for your municipality and get your project off to a strong start.

Project scoping and stakeholder engagement

How a project is defined and who is involved in defining it set the stage for the rest of the wastewater treatment project. In this article, we outline four tips based on best practices for this phase of your project.

Tip 1: Develop a long-term vision

Begin by creating a vision for wastewater treatment in your community over the next 25 to 50 years. Use this vision to drive your short-term planning and decision making. All project plans should clearly demonstrate that the project can both advance these long-term goals and support sustainability plans for your municipality.

  • Form a leadership group to participate in a value-engineering exercise.
  • Use the long-term vision to attract interest and support from funders and community members.
  • Invest in existing systems with the long-term vision in mind, rather than making piecemeal changes.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case study on Cranbrook, BC, to learn about their innovative approach to defining their project's scope. Consult the presentations on project scoping and stakeholder engagement from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 2: Engage early and broadly

Early in the project you must engage with a wide range of decision makers, practitioners, regulators and the public. It is critical to maintain constant communication and hold regular meetings with all the key external stakeholders to keep them informed and involved, and to gain their support for the project.

  • Meet with your provincial environment department officials early in the process to learn from their expertise, gain their support and expedite the permitting process.
  • Engage the community to explain the project and its benefits, and to modify the design to address their concerns. This will help you earn community buy-in and support.
  • Maintain regular engagement with practitioners, decision makers and the public through appropriate communication channels.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on St. Andrews, NB, Picton, ON, and Cranbrook, BC, to see how they engaged stakeholders in their projects. Consult the presentations on project scoping and stakeholder engagement from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 3: Conduct background research

Background research should include assessing the performance of current systems, undertaking optimization studies, conducting feasibility studies and reviewing what other municipalities have done. It is important to learn about other municipalities' experiences, both good and bad, and to conduct a comprehensive review and assessment of viable approaches and their costs. Conducting background research on suitable technologies and innovations is critical to your project's success.

  • Do your own research and involve local regulators, interest groups and citizens. Work with regulators and interest groups (e.g. conservation authorities) and identify the regional environmental trends and requirements (e.g. declining phosphorous limits).
  • Work with operations and maintenance staff to conduct a detailed review of your current operations at the treatment facility before initiating any design. This will reduce the likelihood of repeating design approaches that are not working or of introducing an innovation that is not compatible with the current system.
  • Brainstorm and discuss issues with others to see if you can identify innovative ways to use existing technologies. New technologies may not always be required to achieve your goals.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on St.Andrews, NB, Barrie, ON, and Cranbrook, BC, to discover how solid background research helped their projects succeed. Consult the presentations on project scoping and stakeholder engagement from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 4: Develop a clear project scope

It is important to clearly define the needs and desired outcomes of your project before settling on a new technological solution or deciding that optimized use of existing technology will work. Be sure to develop a clear project definition that presents the scope of the project, as well as its goals, objectives, functional requirements, financial considerations and timelines.

Checklist for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade

Use our project checklist to ensure you are addressing the key issues in every phase of your project.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

The focus of this project was to enhance Barrie's wastewater treatment to accommodate municipal growth and improve the quality of the water flowing out of the plant and into Kempenfelt Bay.

Barrie's waterfront along Lake Simcoe's Kempenfelt Bay is an important centrepiece for the community. It is lined with parks and beaches, and hosts festivals throughout the summer. Popular recreational activities include boating, fishing, fundraisers, walking trails, biking trails, scuba diving, etc.

The City of Barrie's wastewater treatment facility, called the Water Pollution Control Centre, receives domestic, commercial and industrial wastewater and treats it to meet the water quality standards of Lake Simcoe. This project upgraded the existing wastewater treatment capacity from 57 to 76 megalitres average day flow (MLD). It also improved treatment by minimizing raw sewage overflows, and controlling ammonia release and phosphorus loadings.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • High-efficiency UV bulbs, and high-efficiency motors for all pumps and mixers
  • Wastewater biogas for fuel instead of electricity or natural gas
  • An Odour Control Unit to minimize odours that emanate from the facility 
  • Continued health of Kempenfelt Bay and Lake Simcoe, which are major economic drivers for Barrie and the surrounds
  • Allows Barrie to continue to grow as per the province's "Places to Grow" policy
  • Increased opportunities to participate in waterfront activities
  • Quality of life for surrounding neighbourhoods, with all processing tanks covered and an enhanced tree buffer
  • Improved worker health and safety, based on feedback from facility staff and condition assessments
  • Good relationships with the public, who were informed of the project through newsletters and newspaper articles

Challenges

  • Efforts were made during the design process to identify potential shut-downs. However, the contractor's schedules were not reliable as they did not reflect the reality of the time it takes for the biological processes to establish and/or respond. 
  • Due to the length of the project, some equipment suppliers went through ownership changes, resulting in service level changes that were not always for the better.
  • As the project progressed, several key people retired, transferred to another project or relocated to other companies.

Lessons learned

  • An increased effort at the beginning of the project should be placed on the testing and commissioning processes, specifically when working on an expansion to an existing facility. 
  • Where practical during design, physically confirm operability of the existing equipment that will be used for tie-ins and commissioning. Usually they have been sitting idle, since they were put in during previous expansions.   
  • Conduct a quality-based selection of an engineering firm based on expertise and experience, not based on price, as any errors and omissions could cost in delay claims and/or extra work.

Resources

Partners and Collaborators

Project Contact

Graeme King, P. Eng. PMP
Senior Project Engineer
City of Barrie, ON
T. 705-739-4220 ext. 4532

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

This is the second article in the three-part series Tips for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade. 

The articles in this series highlight the three key phases of a project and draw on proven lessons from a dozen of the successful wastewater treatment studies and projects that FCM's Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has funded.

In the first article in this series, we looked at best practices for project scoping and generating stakeholder engagement. In this article, we'll examine the second phase, project planning and design, and outline three suggestions for assessing options and selecting your preferred approach to your wastewater treatment plant project.

Project planning and design

It is important to take the time to get the planning stage right. Our review of GMF-funded wastewater projects revealed that insufficient investment in planning and analysis was a common and important challenge. 

Municipalities often face pressure from funders, regulators and stakeholders to move forward quickly with a wastewater project, particularly if they are not in compliance with effluent quality requirements. This can result in project design decisions that do not consider the full range of solutions available and their life cycle costs and can lead to delays and cost overruns during the construction and operation phases. 

Successful municipalities recognize that innovative and sustainable projects require an integrated approach to planning, management and decision making.

Tip 1: Use integrated teams and processes

Establish an integrated project team with representatives from each of the relevant departments in your municipality, and engage this team throughout the design process. 

Involving staff members from different departments (e.g. procurement, environment, etc.) will bring a range of new perspectives to the project and help you anticipate potential problems. The composition of this group can vary according to the size of your municipality and its structure. For example, very small municipalities may only have one operator for their treatment facility, but a larger municipality may have several layers of organization. 

Moreover, successful municipalities understand the importance of involving operations staff in every stage of the project from preliminary design through to commissioning. This integrated team approach increases all team members' understanding and sense of ownership of the project, and leads to better decisions and designs.  

  • Consult operations staff members directly and regularly throughout the preliminary and detailed design process. Their input will help shape the project, identify cost-cutting activities and foster a sense of ownership during subsequent project phases and the operation of the plant.
  • Use an integrated design process (IDP) and bring together internal participants from different departments and levels (e.g. administration, procurement, operations) along with key external participants (e.g. regulators, architects, engineers, contractors, users, researchers, consultants). Integrated teams and IDPs tend to create better approaches and plans, reducing the risk of unanticipated delays later in the project.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Brockville, ON, and Picton, ON, for examples of successful, integrated project teams. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 2: Optimize long-term returns on investment 

As owners and operators of wastewater systems, municipalities bear both the construction and the operating costs of these facilities. Thus, it is important to look beyond the initial capital costs to select the technologies and systems with the best long-term return on investment. Making the best decisions to ensure efficiency in both construction and operations is critical to achieving long-term cost savings and optimal performance.  

The experience of our partners suggests that you should consider two approaches: 

  • Life-cycle cost analysis includes a range of techniques to look at the potential environmental impacts of a product or project and the costs of purchasing, owning, operating, maintaining and disposing of it. This approach helps decision makers compare the full costs of the various options and select the option(s) with the best long-term return on investment, rather than automatically going with the option with the cheapest upfront costs.
  • Value engineering is a structured approach to analyzing projects, products or services to deliver the maximum value for the municipality. The process focusses on achieving the optimal balance between function, performance, quality, safety and cost. While value engineering is most effective when used during the design stage, most of the projects we reviewed used it during the procurement process to look for cost savings.

Use either a life-cycle cost analysis or a value engineering approach early on to identify and preselect the technology that provides the best value for your municipality's needs. Later, use the results of life-cycle cost analysis and other cost-benefit analysis to guide the tendering process.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Amherstburg, ON, and Argyle, NS, to see how these approaches were used successfully. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 3: Include contingencies in the project budget and schedule 

Contingency planning is important to manage delays and cost overruns due to problems with contractors, suppliers and extreme weather events. Working with specialized cost consultants to develop risk management plans will help you to create more realistic budgets and schedules. 

At a minimum, municipalities should build a 25 per cent contingency into their budgets for financing or fundraising purposes. With this contingency line in place, your municipality will be able to access the funds it needs without looking for alternative forms of financing should additional costs be incurred.

  • Build in budget and schedule contingencies to deal with cost increases, extreme weather, contractor delays and other potential challenges.
  • For upgrades on existing facilities, include sequencing activities so operations at the plant will be able to continue undisturbed.
  • Set clear requirements to complete scheduled work before releasing payment.
  • Work and communicate with the contractor and funding partners to resolve delays and deal with any additional costs without sacrificing the integrity of the project.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Waterloo, ON, Wetaskiwin, AB, Amherstburg, ON, and St. Andrews, NB, which illustrate how rigorous planning and estimating processes enabled these projects to overcome delays and increased costs. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Checklist for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade

Use our project checklist to ensure you are addressing the key issues in every phase of your project.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Pagination

Subscribe to