The focus of this project was to enhance Barrie's wastewater treatment to accommodate municipal growth and improve the quality of the water flowing out of the plant and into Kempenfelt Bay.

Barrie's waterfront along Lake Simcoe's Kempenfelt Bay is an important centrepiece for the community. It is lined with parks and beaches, and hosts festivals throughout the summer. Popular recreational activities include boating, fishing, fundraisers, walking trails, biking trails, scuba diving, etc.

The City of Barrie's wastewater treatment facility, called the Water Pollution Control Centre, receives domestic, commercial and industrial wastewater and treats it to meet the water quality standards of Lake Simcoe. This project upgraded the existing wastewater treatment capacity from 57 to 76 megalitres average day flow (MLD). It also improved treatment by minimizing raw sewage overflows, and controlling ammonia release and phosphorus loadings.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • High-efficiency UV bulbs, and high-efficiency motors for all pumps and mixers
  • Wastewater biogas for fuel instead of electricity or natural gas
  • An Odour Control Unit to minimize odours that emanate from the facility 
  • Continued health of Kempenfelt Bay and Lake Simcoe, which are major economic drivers for Barrie and the surrounds
  • Allows Barrie to continue to grow as per the province's "Places to Grow" policy
  • Increased opportunities to participate in waterfront activities
  • Quality of life for surrounding neighbourhoods, with all processing tanks covered and an enhanced tree buffer
  • Improved worker health and safety, based on feedback from facility staff and condition assessments
  • Good relationships with the public, who were informed of the project through newsletters and newspaper articles

Challenges

  • Efforts were made during the design process to identify potential shut-downs. However, the contractor's schedules were not reliable as they did not reflect the reality of the time it takes for the biological processes to establish and/or respond. 
  • Due to the length of the project, some equipment suppliers went through ownership changes, resulting in service level changes that were not always for the better.
  • As the project progressed, several key people retired, transferred to another project or relocated to other companies.

Lessons learned

  • An increased effort at the beginning of the project should be placed on the testing and commissioning processes, specifically when working on an expansion to an existing facility. 
  • Where practical during design, physically confirm operability of the existing equipment that will be used for tie-ins and commissioning. Usually they have been sitting idle, since they were put in during previous expansions.   
  • Conduct a quality-based selection of an engineering firm based on expertise and experience, not based on price, as any errors and omissions could cost in delay claims and/or extra work.

Resources

Partners and Collaborators

Project Contact

Graeme King, P. Eng. PMP
Senior Project Engineer
City of Barrie, ON
T. 705-739-4220 ext. 4532

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

This is the second article in the three-part series Tips for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade. 

The articles in this series highlight the three key phases of a project and draw on proven lessons from a dozen of the successful wastewater treatment studies and projects that FCM's Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has funded.

In the first article in this series, we looked at best practices for project scoping and generating stakeholder engagement. In this article, we'll examine the second phase, project planning and design, and outline three suggestions for assessing options and selecting your preferred approach to your wastewater treatment plant project.

Project planning and design

It is important to take the time to get the planning stage right. Our review of GMF-funded wastewater projects revealed that insufficient investment in planning and analysis was a common and important challenge. 

Municipalities often face pressure from funders, regulators and stakeholders to move forward quickly with a wastewater project, particularly if they are not in compliance with effluent quality requirements. This can result in project design decisions that do not consider the full range of solutions available and their life cycle costs and can lead to delays and cost overruns during the construction and operation phases. 

Successful municipalities recognize that innovative and sustainable projects require an integrated approach to planning, management and decision making.

Tip 1: Use integrated teams and processes

Establish an integrated project team with representatives from each of the relevant departments in your municipality, and engage this team throughout the design process. 

Involving staff members from different departments (e.g. procurement, environment, etc.) will bring a range of new perspectives to the project and help you anticipate potential problems. The composition of this group can vary according to the size of your municipality and its structure. For example, very small municipalities may only have one operator for their treatment facility, but a larger municipality may have several layers of organization. 

Moreover, successful municipalities understand the importance of involving operations staff in every stage of the project from preliminary design through to commissioning. This integrated team approach increases all team members' understanding and sense of ownership of the project, and leads to better decisions and designs.  

  • Consult operations staff members directly and regularly throughout the preliminary and detailed design process. Their input will help shape the project, identify cost-cutting activities and foster a sense of ownership during subsequent project phases and the operation of the plant.
  • Use an integrated design process (IDP) and bring together internal participants from different departments and levels (e.g. administration, procurement, operations) along with key external participants (e.g. regulators, architects, engineers, contractors, users, researchers, consultants). Integrated teams and IDPs tend to create better approaches and plans, reducing the risk of unanticipated delays later in the project.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Brockville, ON, and Picton, ON, for examples of successful, integrated project teams. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 2: Optimize long-term returns on investment 

As owners and operators of wastewater systems, municipalities bear both the construction and the operating costs of these facilities. Thus, it is important to look beyond the initial capital costs to select the technologies and systems with the best long-term return on investment. Making the best decisions to ensure efficiency in both construction and operations is critical to achieving long-term cost savings and optimal performance.  

The experience of our partners suggests that you should consider two approaches: 

  • Life-cycle cost analysis includes a range of techniques to look at the potential environmental impacts of a product or project and the costs of purchasing, owning, operating, maintaining and disposing of it. This approach helps decision makers compare the full costs of the various options and select the option(s) with the best long-term return on investment, rather than automatically going with the option with the cheapest upfront costs.
  • Value engineering is a structured approach to analyzing projects, products or services to deliver the maximum value for the municipality. The process focusses on achieving the optimal balance between function, performance, quality, safety and cost. While value engineering is most effective when used during the design stage, most of the projects we reviewed used it during the procurement process to look for cost savings.

Use either a life-cycle cost analysis or a value engineering approach early on to identify and preselect the technology that provides the best value for your municipality's needs. Later, use the results of life-cycle cost analysis and other cost-benefit analysis to guide the tendering process.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Amherstburg, ON, and Argyle, NS, to see how these approaches were used successfully. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 3: Include contingencies in the project budget and schedule 

Contingency planning is important to manage delays and cost overruns due to problems with contractors, suppliers and extreme weather events. Working with specialized cost consultants to develop risk management plans will help you to create more realistic budgets and schedules. 

At a minimum, municipalities should build a 25 per cent contingency into their budgets for financing or fundraising purposes. With this contingency line in place, your municipality will be able to access the funds it needs without looking for alternative forms of financing should additional costs be incurred.

  • Build in budget and schedule contingencies to deal with cost increases, extreme weather, contractor delays and other potential challenges.
  • For upgrades on existing facilities, include sequencing activities so operations at the plant will be able to continue undisturbed.
  • Set clear requirements to complete scheduled work before releasing payment.
  • Work and communicate with the contractor and funding partners to resolve delays and deal with any additional costs without sacrificing the integrity of the project.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Waterloo, ON, Wetaskiwin, AB, Amherstburg, ON, and St. Andrews, NB, which illustrate how rigorous planning and estimating processes enabled these projects to overcome delays and increased costs. Consult the presentations on project planning and design from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Checklist for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade

Use our project checklist to ensure you are addressing the key issues in every phase of your project.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

This is the third article in the three-part series Tips for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade. 

The articles in this series highlight the three key phases of a project and draw on proven lessons from a dozen of the successful wastewater treatment studies and projects that FCM's Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has funded.

In the first article in this series, we looked at best practices for project scoping and generating stakeholder engagement. The second article discussed how successful municipalities conducted their planning and design stage.

In this third and final article, we review the procurement, construction and start-up phase of the project and discuss four best practices to:

  • Follow flexible procurement practices that place a higher weight on quality and experience, since lower-cost bids do not necessarily result in lower-cost projects.
  • Communicate constantly and coordinate the activities of the stakeholders involved in the construction, operation and start-up of the project.
  • Prepare training and change management plans to support operations and maintenance staff after start-up.
  • Create detailed plans for testing and commissioning to ensure proper and continuous performance of the plant.  

Procurement, construction and start-up

Tip 1: Use flexible procurement processes

The best approach to selecting products, engineering consultants and service providers is a flexible, alternatives-to-lowest-bid procurement practice, such as Qualifications-based Selection (or QBS).

QBS is a competitive process for selecting a professional consulting firm based on their technical competence, experience with similar projects, personnel, local knowledge and availability. The municipality then negotiates the project schedule, budget and fees with the successful proponent. Selecting a consultant based on qualifications does not preclude consideration of price. It simply removes it from the consultant evaluation phase and introduces it after the scope of service has been determined. 

In our case studies, we saw three successful approaches to QBS procurement:  
 
Prequalify service providers and equipment based on quality
Save time by using a prequalification process to set the minimum quality of bids for selecting contractors, sub-consultants and/or equipment. In some cases, municipalities have Procurement By-laws which must be followed.

  • Use a quality-based selection process so that only contractors with extensive relevant experience can receive qualifying scores.
  • Preselect the equipment that will enable your municipality to use life-cycle cost analysis when comparing different suppliers.
  • Provide the scope of work, drawings, specs and Request for Proposal to suppliers so they can submit an expression of interest and prequalification form.

Use alternative service delivery
A conventional procurement approach typically involves hiring one firm to design the wastewater system and then a second firm to build it. In some cases, a third firm will be hired to operate the facility. Consider an alternative approach and seek a single bidder to either design and build (DB) or design, build and operate (DBO) the system.
 
Optimize project design and cost
Work with your successful bidders to see if changes in the project design or tender details could reduce the project cost without compromising its performance.

  • Present bidders with the opportunity to operate the facility and offset their upfront capital costs against future income, or to finance the project and make money on the investment.  The builder-operator will be more likely to choose the appropriate construction methods while keeping in mind the operating costs.
  • Work with the design/build team to determine what aspects of the project can be eliminated or modified without impacting the project goals.
  • Consider modifying the project schedule to reduce costs.  

Overall, it's important to evaluate the procurement options and select the ones that are most appropriate for your project and organization. Selecting the right method will also help you build a case for the decision makers so they understand the need for quality and don't automatically pick the lowest bid.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read our case studies to see how Kapuskasing, ON, used a quality-based selection process for suppliers, Picton, ON, implemented a design-build contract and St. Andrews, NB, adjusted the project schedule to reduce costs. You may also want to consult the presentations on procurement, construction and start-up from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 2: Use effective communications and project management

Effective communication and project management are major success factors for your project. It is important to maintain constant communication and active coordination with all parties involved in the project design, construction and operation, including contractors, consultants, operators, city departments and decision makers.

Recommended communication tools and methods include:

  • Ongoing, transparent public engagement and communications through the municipal website, press releases and media events, open houses, newsletters, community events and social media.
  • Frequent, integrated project management meetings with all internal and external parties involved in the design, construction and operation to coordinate activities, proactively identify and address potential issues, and share project updates.
  • Regular reporting to council, funders and regulators on the status of the project. Some municipalities retain a project management firm to lead that process, which allows for a number of individuals to share their expertise.
  • Using experienced project managers, either from within the municipality or from an external project management firm.
  • Appointing a Project Champion to work with the design team, with broad authority for day-to-day decision making and to delegate authority to the senior administration to award contracts within pre-approved budgets.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read our case studies to see how different approaches worked for two municipalities: Cranbrook, BC, appointed a Project Champion to lead a team of city staff, while Brockville, ON, retained a project management firm. Consult the presentations on procurement, construction and start-up from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 3: Develop a comprehensive training and change plan

The success of your state-of-the-art wastewater treatment plant, delivered on time and under budget, will depend on having qualified staff who know how to operate and maintain it. 

Prepare staff members to manage the new system by developing training materials and clear guidance. Start training your plant operators during the construction stage so that they are familiar with all the changes and requirements. Throughout this process, it is important to build a sense of ownership among operations staff and to share the rationale for adopting any new procedures.

  • Develop detailed databases, manuals and built drawings.
  • Involve operations staff in the design, construction and commissioning processes.
  • Develop training curriculum and change management plans.
  • If possible, make the operations manuals available electronically on tablets for the staff to carry with them as they are working around the plant, rather than consulting cumbersome paper manuals for technical details.
  • Update the operations and equipment manufacturer's product information as soon as updates are issued.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case study on Amherstburg, ON, to see how operations staff benefit from using tablets to gain easy, timely access to the manuals they require. Consult the presentations on procurement, construction and start-up from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Tip 4: Prepare detailed testing and commissioning work plans

Emphasize planning for testing and commissioning at the beginning of the project to minimize shutdowns and ensure performance. This is particularly important when dealing with the expansion of an existing facility that needs to keep operating during the testing phase.

  • Conduct constructability reviews to establish the appropriate sequencing to maintain continuous operations during an expansion.
  • Develop detailed work plans, complete with contingency planning, when taking major process units in and out of service.
  • Provide temporary facilities and/or controls as required for the continuous operation of the plant during construction.
  • Physically confirm the operability of any existing equipment, such as valves and gates that will be used for tie-ins and commissioning. If this equipment has been sitting idle, it may not function as required when needed.

Learn what other municipalities have done

Read the case studies on Barrie, ON, and Waterloo, ON, to understand how physically testing equipment and developing detailed work plans helped them ensure performance of their plants. Consult the presentations on procurement, construction and start-up from our online workshop series on wastewater best practices.

Checklist for a successful wastewater treatment plant upgrade

Use our project checklist to ensure you are addressing the key issues in every phase of your project.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Discover practical and cost-effective sustainability solutions for your community

Many of today's innovative best practices in sustainability seemed radical just 10 years ago. In a series of six articles, we explore inspiring projects and sustainability solutions being implemented in cities and towns of all sizes across Canada. 

Read the whole series to find new ideas to bring to your municipal council, learn more about concepts you may already have heard about, and find resources to help you implement these solutions in your community. 

Articles in the series

How to gain $1.2M in value from wastewater

  • Learn about Cranbrook, BC's award-winning project to reclaim wastewater for irrigation. Part of a series on sustainability ideas for Canadian communities. 

How Saint-Hyacinthe turns waste into biogas

  • Learn how a Quebec community creates biogas plus environmental and economic benefits from organic waste.

Do you have aging suburban infrastructure?

  • Learn how Brampton, ON, is preparing its older suburbs for climate change. Part of a series on sustainability ideas for Canadian communities.

Why net-zero energy helps reduce emissions and costs

  • Net-zero energy buildings are designed to produce as much energy as they consume. Learn how this can help your community reduce greenhouse gases and costs. 

Cut GHG in half with low-carbon design

  • Explore an important sustainability approach Canadian municipalities can use to lower GHG and infrastructure costs, and increase affordable housing.

How to quadruple bike use in your region

  • Follow Ottawa's lead and integrate transit and cycling to increase bike use year-round. Part of a series on sustainability ideas for Canadian communities.

This series was inspired by "From Crazy to Common Sense: 'Radical' Ideas Whose Time Have Come," a workshop held at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' 2016 Sustainable Communities Conference.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Session summary

Cities and communities across Canada have brownfield sites in their municipality — former commercial or industrial sites that are vacant or underutilized, and suitable for redevelopment.

Watch our webinar recording to learn how your community can take on brownfield projects and programs to redevelop these sites, from engaging stakeholders and developing a brownfield strategy, to implementing solutions and tracking your successes.

During this webinar, you'll:

  • Learn about best practices in brownfield redevelopment
  • Discover key steps for brownfield renewal initiatives
  • Hear about FCM's brownfield revitalization resources and funding

Who should watch

Municipal staff in the brownfields sector, as well as staff from the economic and urban planning departments. Elected officials interested in learning more about brownfield redevelopment can also benefit from the webinar.

Speakers

  • Alex Cool-Fergus, Project Coordinator, Knowledge Services, FCM's Green Municipal Fund
  • Benjamin Koczwarski, Advisor, Programs Outreach, FCM's Green Municipal Fund

Webinar

Read the transcript.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Hydraulic dredging using a motor pump and suction hose

To restore the highly eutrophicated Saint-Augustin Lake and prevent the proliferation of cyanobacteria, Quebec City, QC conducted two field tests to determine the effectiveness of various nutrient control techniques. In the first test, waterborne phosphorus was precipitated in the bottom sediments, which were then covered and hence neutralized. The second test involved precipitating the phosphorus and then pumping out the sediment for treatment and disposal. In both cases, the city assessed the release rate for existing and new sediment, and conducted a technical and socioeconomic assessment, including a preliminary study of environmental impacts. The findings showed that the first method produced better results.

There are few examples of in situ management of sediment-derived phosphorus in Canada. The findings from the pilot project will therefore be invaluable for municipalities faced with similar issues.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Restoring the lake will reduce the existing phosphorus concentration from 70 μg/l to 10 μg/l.

  • The selected treatment restricts the proliferation of algae such as cyanobacteria, enhances biodiversity and improves the aquatic ecosystem.

  • Dredged lake sediments can be recycled as backfill or cover material.

  • A rise in recreational and tourism activities will boost the city's economic vitality.

  • Riverside property values will not decrease, they may even rise.

  • Once the lake is restored, it will again be used for recreational purposes.

  • People can use the lake without fear of any health risks.

Challenges

  • This project involved a number of municipal, provincial, federal and private partners, who each had their own agreement models with various obligations and commitments. Reaching an agreement that accommodated the individual stakeholders various constraints was therefore a rather lengthy process.

  • Installing the floating platform also raised numerous issues, specifically anchoring the enclosures at the bottom of the lake. Under the circumstances, the City had to use professional divers.

  • In addition, extreme weather conditions compromised the effectiveness of the platform. Numerous minor repairs were required.

Lessons learned

  • If a complete assessment reveals the presence of various pollutants, control measures for the entire watershed must be put in place. Control measures can then be directly applied to the aquatic ecosystem.

  • The two field tests were conducted only once in each case for three to four months. Also before attempting to restore the entire lake, it is essential to conduct tests in isolated areas for two to three years. The effectiveness of the technologies can therefore be estimated and documented.

  • Municipalities interested in restoring a lake with a similar problem will find an overview of the project in the final report including a description of the pilot project, research findings and test results, a comparative analysis of the remediation measures tested, along with conclusions and recommendations.

  • On the basis of this experience, Quebec City was pleased that it had set up a multidisciplinary committee. Given that the project involved every sphere of sustainable development, the multidisciplinary committee provided a broader perspective and increased the chances of success.

Partners and Collaborators

Project Contact

Alexandre Baker
Environmental Advisor
Environment Department, Water Quality Division
Quebec City, QC
Alexandre.baker@ville.quebec.qc.ca
T. 418-641-6411, ext. 2827
T. 418-641-6556

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

Best practices for meeting Canadian municipal wastewater regulations

Are you looking for technical information and examples of best practices to help you with your municipality's wastewater treatment initiative?

We have developed case studies to help Canadian cities and towns of all sizes meet the wastewater regulations introduced by the federal government. 

The case studies provide valuable information that you can apply to your own wastewater treatment plant projects and upgrades. They include technical information, project details, tips on best practices and the significant benefits gained by community members.

Read the case studies to learn the steps you can take to:

  • Upgrade, retrofit or replace your wastewater treatment system.
  • Increase capacity and extend the service life of your wastewater treatment plant.
  • Improve wastewater quality, reduce odour levels and eliminate chemical residues.
  • Learn about alternative ways to minimize energy use.  

Each study also includes contact information so you can connect with people who have firsthand experience overcoming specific challenges and obstacles in these initiatives. Connect with them to ask for advice on projects in your municipality.

Read the case studies in our series

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

This checklist outlines the best practices for your municipality to follow to ensure a successful wastewater upgrade project. It is based on a three-part article series that provides a framework to help municipalities develop innovative and sustainable wastewater system projects.

It highlights important points to consider during each of the three phases of a successful project:

  1. Phase 1: Project scoping and stakeholder engagement
  2. Phase 2: Project planning and design
  3. Phase 3: Procurement, construction and start-up

Use the checklist as a guide to ensure that you are addressing the key issues during each phase of your project.

Phase 1: Project scoping and stakeholder engagement

How a wastewater treatment project is defined and who is involved in defining it set the stage for the rest of the project.

Activity Yes No
Develop a long-term vision Your municipality (council) has considered and/or discussed a long-term vision for serving the community. Operations staff have been included in those discussions.  
Engage early and broadly Your project manager has engaged all of the relevant stakeholders. This may include regulators, citizen groups, council, operations staff and staff from other relevant departments (e.g. procurement, environment or engineering).
Conduct background research Your engineering department and/or operations staff have identified technologies that might work for your system. You have completed a comprehensive review of information from other sources such as regulators, other municipalities, the Canadian Water and Wastewater Association, the Canadian Water Network, equipment suppliers and regional wastewater associations.  
Develop a clear project scope The project manager has outlined the goals and realistic objectives to address your project needs.

Phase 2: Project planning and design

Innovative and sustainable projects require an integrated approach to planning, management and decision making.

Activity Yes No
Use integrated teams and processes You have representation from the various relevant departments within your municipality (e.g. procurement, operations, engineering, environment, communications). You are planning to have regular team meetings.
Optimize long-term returns on investment You have undertaken a value-engineering analysis. A part of your team is undertaking a life-cycle cost analysis.
Include contingencies in the project budget and schedule A percentage of the budget has been set aside for contingencies. You have factored the costs associated with extreme weather events in your budgeting. You have considered how the schedule could be affected by delays in funding.

Phase 3: Procurement, construction and start-up

Building your wastewater facility requires a mix of careful planning, coordination and flexibility.

Activity Yes No
Use flexible procurement processes You have consulted with your procurement department. You have established a procurement process. You have considered alternative service delivery methods.  
Use effective communications and project management You are communicating with each stakeholder group. You are sharing information with councillors.
Develop a comprehensive training and change plan You have considered how you will keep operations staff up to date with training.
Prepare detailed testing and commissioning work plans You have a testing plan in place throughout the project. Your commissioning plan is in place.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Sarnia's Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) brings together initiatives already underway to optimize budgets, personnel and other resources across municipal departments.

Sarnia is the largest urban centre in Lambton County. It has had a long history of partnership with the county, as well as with the local Aamjiwnaang First Nation community of about 850 Chippewa (Ojibwa) aboriginal peoples.

While there were existing sustainability-related initiatives in the City, the ICSP is the first document to knit the existing initiatives together. It is not intended as a prescriptive plan, but rather a reference document for those developing community projects to ensure sustainability goals can be achieved.

Some specific objectives outlined in the ICSP include brownfield redevelopment, improved services for the greying population, encouragement of new green and bio-based industries, and "destination" tourism through an art gallery, a museum and First Nations culture.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • Brownfield redevelopment

    More energy efficient vehicles introduced to city fleet, including hybrid vehicles

  • Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) used to measure environmental impact

  • Encouragement of "Destination" tourism through art gallery, museum and First Nations

  • Encouragement of growth and development of new green and bio-based industries

  • Incorporating disaster resilience and mitigation into decisions and actions

  • Improved services for the greying population

  • Raising the profile of cultural activity in community planning and development

  • Citizens of Sarnia and Lambton working together to achieve sustainability goals

Challenges

  • Culture as part of sustainability was a matter of significant discussion and some delay.
  • In the end, culture was included as an essential element of the ISCP. Members of the community, including the local First Nations, confirmed the wisdom of this decision.
  • The Plan has not yet received significant media coverage, but positive recognition is expected as sustainability projects are implemented.

Lessons learned

  • Determine what sustainability initiatives already exist in the community, what success has already been achieved, and whether any disappointments have been experienced and, if so, why.
  • Ensure that municipal council, management, staff, industry and the private sector are supportive of the principles of sustainability.
  • Determine in advance whether the plan is prescriptive or high-level.
  • Establish ICSP development milestones, how metrics will be developed, and the budget and timeline expected.

Resources

Partners and collaborators

Project contact

Peter Hungerford
Director of Economic Development & Corporate Planning
City of Sarnia, ON
T. 519-332-0330 ext. 3343

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

Landscape view of the City of Kingston, Ontario.

The City of Kingston, ON wanted to create a sustainability plan with a difference. City staff felt that to truly work, sustainability had to be an idea that is owned not just by city staff and council, but by the community as well.

The idea of community ownership drove much of the discussion around the plan. In the end, there are three-prongs to Kingston's "community-owned" plan. There is the plan itself; a website that — among other things — lays out a set of best practices for individuals, businesses and organizations to follow; and the creation of an arms-length governing body that will drive sustainability forward in Kingston.

Results

Environmental Economic Social
  • A best practices website
  • Creation of an arms-length governing body to drive sustainability forward in Kingston
  • Reduce and/or mitigate GHG emissions to become carbon neutral
  • Establish Kingston as a leader in green energy - wind, solar, biofuel
  • Become a hub for research and development companies
  • Support and implement green procurement policies
  • Reduce reliance on food bank usage
  • Support the inclusion of affordable housing in new developments
  • Increase opportunities for those who wish to age-in-place

Challenges

  • How to make concrete the idea of "community ownership" of a sustainability plan
  • Getting buy-in from council on the idea of an arms-length body being responsible for sustainability

Lessons learned

  • Invitation-only meetings were key to making the idea of community ownership concrete
  • Don't underestimate the importance of buy-in from politicians and staff in the process

Resources

Partners and collaborators

Project contact

Paul MacLatchy
Director, Environmental and Sustainable Initiatives
Kingston, ON
T. 613-546-4291

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada. 

Visit the projects database

Pagination

Subscribe to