In this impressive retrofit initiative, we learn how The Atmospheric Fund, in partnership with Toronto Community Housing achieved impressive environmental benefits. The project saw GHG emissions by the equivalent of 963 tons of CO2 and creating over $450,000 in annual utility cost savings. Through the project, however, they realized that they could achieve so much more. Their resident-engagement program uncovered important resident perceptions of the health and comfort conditions in their homes.

By partnering with Building Up, a non-profit organization that trains people facing employment barriers, the project hired 12 community members on a short-term basis and 90% of them have since gone on to apprenticeships or careers in the trades – often with other contractors who worked on the project.

The project’s innovative financing model, a form of non-debt financing, has carved the way for new thinking in project financing.

Speaker

Bryan Purcell, Vice-President of Policy and Programs at The Atmospheric Fund

Read the transcript

Find out more about how you can drive efficiency in your community housing projects!

Check out the complete Case Study for this initiative.

Explore our Sustainable Affordable Housing Funding program. 

This video is extracted from the webinar "How to adapt green municipal projects to stand the test of time" presented on March, 30 , 2021. Watch the full webinar.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

In big cities across Canada, the leaders of the Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) network and its founders are finding new ways to address climate change by breaking down barriers to implement and scale up low carbon solutions, and to support their cities in reaching their climate change targets.

Municipalities are at the leading edge of developing and implementing climate change solutions to reduce greenhouse gases, build resilient communities, improve the quality of life of their citizens, and much more. Each LC3 Centre focuses on addressing the unique needs of their local communities, such as:

  • community grant-making to advance efforts of diverse local leadership;
  • program development to bridge local capacity gaps and catalyze new approaches; and
  • impact investing to mobilize private resources towards low-carbon solutions.

In this article series, we focus on getting to know the leaders of the LC3 network.

Read on to learn how they have supported the vision and inception of the LC3 network, are finding new ways to address climate change in big cities, and get a glimpse of their plans to support Canada as we strive to reach our 2030 and 2050 climate targets.

Eric St-Pierre: Helping lead and expand the climate change conversation
Headshot of Eric St-Pierre. Photo by Alex Tran Photography

Eric St-Pierre has played a key role in helping set up the Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) network.

LC3 – a partnership years in the making between six non-profit organizations and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities– is funded by the Government of Canada. It all began in 2016, when St-Pierre vividly remembers meeting The Atmospheric Fund’s (TAF) CEO Julia Langer at an event in Toronto.

“It was within my first six months at the Trottier Family Foundation,” says St-Pierre, who had joined the Foundation as Executive Director. “I was learning about TAF at an event and kept thinking: ‘What a wonderful model.’ I was really excited to look into Montreal’s atmospheric fund, until I realized there wasn’t one in our city.”

St-Pierre decided to be proactive – he engaged with an energy consulting company and continued to meet with Langer and her team to research ways to create a model similar to TAF’s in the Montreal region.

“At the time, I was just thinking about Montreal and wasn't really thinking about national outreach,” he says. “But Julia, her team and I continued the conversation about doing this across Canada.”

The partnership developed further in 2017 through a national consultation led by TAF and funded by the Clean Economy Fund and the Canadian Urban Sustainability Practitioners, to consider how to strengthen the capacity of Canadian cities to scale-up urban climate solutions. This ultimately led to the creation of what we know as the LC3 network today – a model where each LC3 Centre will receive an endowment enabling it to invest in demonstrating, de-risking and scaling up local solutions to climate change to meet Canada’s 2030 and 2050 carbon reduction targets.

The Trottier Family Foundation was equally instrumental in the creation of Montreal’s newly created LC3 Centre, the Greater Montreal Climate Fund (GMCF), and the Network itself. From grants towards the consultation process, legal and communication expenses, to government relations, in-kind support, and start-up costs for the GMCF, St-Pierre and his team have spent countless hours and grants since 2016 to make this initiative a reality.

From his perspective, he says that working with other LC3 Centres will be highly beneficial to the Foundation and its climate change work in Montreal. “I'm hoping to learn what other Centres are doing, and bring some of our work to the table,” he says. “For example, it would be great to establish a program in Montreal that is focused on building retrofits and energy-efficiency projects, and then share that with other LC3 Centres, so they can implement their own programs in their communities.”

St-Pierre is also looking forward to building on network-wide opportunities and sharing his Foundation’s experience and ideas with LC3. “Montreal has a really rich ecosystem in the finance world and in the environmental community, and we'll be able to draw quite a lot from our experience here,” he says. “I think LC3 is a great project and we're really excited to reflect on our Year One activities with the Network!”

St-Pierre also continues to work with the Network in his capacity as board member of the LC3 Executive Board.

The Trottier Family Foundation is a Montreal-based private Canadian charitable foundation. Founded in 2000, the Foundation’s mission is to support organizations that work towards the advancement of scientific inquiry, the promotion of education, fostering better health, protecting the environment and mitigating climate change.

Photo by Alex Tran Photography.

Julia Langer: Leading the way for urban climate solutions in Toronto
Headshot of Julia Langer. Photo courtesy of WWF Canada and Bill Ivy.

Julia Langer’s passion for the environment spans more than three decades, from the time she wanted to become a marine biologist, to when she was inspired by her parents during the Don River clean ups in Toronto.

Since then, she has held senior leadership positions in the environmental sector, managing campaigns and organizations, defining strategy and policy, and inspiring public and private action to address air pollution and climate change in her community.

Her most recent role is CEO of The Atmospheric Fund (TAF), a position she has held since 2009.

“TAF’s mandate is to advance locally relevant solutions to climate change in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area,” she says. “There's no one way to achieve that objective – you often need a combination tools. So, we are a grant maker, an investor, an advocate, and a convener.”

Langer’s creative thinking and big ambitions on climate change and TAF’s successes, led to the inception of the Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) network, modelled on TAF’s trajectory. “TAF was established by the City of Toronto in 1991 before climate change was headline news,” says Langer. “It was about local action, which is what we need in urban areas across the country. We incubated the idea to co-develop the model and what emerged was a proposal for what would later become the LC3 network.”

Since these initial conversations in 2017, the LC3 network has become a partnership between TAF, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), and five other organizations (including seven cities) in major urban areas across Canada. Each organization, as of January 2021, has received or is in the process of receiving an endowment from the Government of Canada to establish their own, local LC3 Centre. Each Centre will invest in and fund grant programs to address their respective city’s climate change goals and create benefits for members in their communities.

Langer says she is really looking forward to the LC3 idea exchange. “The exciting piece is to be able to share knowledge and make our capacity go further,” she says. “We are looking forward to collaboration opportunities on impact investing and co-granting. One perfect example would be working toward a federal zero emissions vehicle mandate: when you see what that mandate would do in terms of urban carbon emission reduction, it's huge. But it is going to take a fair amount of effort to move that forward and get to implementation. And so, working together might be the best way to move the dial. In fact, I think one of the reasons the LC3 concept will work very well is that all stakeholders have a solid experience of working in networks and in a collaborative environment. There is a commitment to using those skills and that approach to further our work.”

Founded in 1991, The Atmospheric Fund (TAF) is a non-profit agency that finances local initiatives to combat climate change and improve air quality in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, which includes investing in low-carbon solutions and scaling them up for broad implementation. TAF’s mandate and the LC3 mandate are synonymous and form the basis upon which the other LC3 Centres are created.

Photo courtesy of WWF Canada and Bill Ivy. 

Vincent Moreau: Executive Director, Greater Montreal Climate Fund

With over 18 years of experience in climate change, environment and sustainable development, Vincent Moreau is recognised by his peers as a skilled manager, strategic developer and a change catalyzer.

For nearly ten years, Vincent worked within the network of Québec’s Regional Environmental Councils (Conseils régionaux de l’environnement) where he served as Executive Director of the Regional Environmental Councils of Quebec (RNCREQ, Réseau national des Conseils régionaux de l’environnement), while managing the Conseil régional de l’environnement de la Montérégie. Just before joining FCGM’s team, Vincent served for three years as Executive Vice-President at Ecotech Quebec, the province’s cleantech industrial cluster.

In these functions, Vincent Moreau called upon as a strategic advisor to governments, municipalities and institutions for policy development, for action plans and consultations in the fields of climate change, environment and sustainable development. Of note, he co-hosted the provincial consultation tour by Quebec government ministers to develop Québec’s electrification policy framework vis à vis climate change.

He has also served on several ministerial committees and boards of directors. He is currently Vice Chair for the Quebec Fund for Sustainable Development (Fonds d’action québécois en développement durable), a member of the board of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in the Operationalization of Sustainable Development (Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en opérationnalisation du développement durable), and a member of the Joint steering committee of the Circular Economy Consultation Center (Centre d’études et de recherches intersectorielles en économie circulaire CERIEC). In the past Vincent has served on the Quebec’s Environment Minister’s Advisory Committee on Climate Change, the Advisory Committee on the Development of the Sustainable Mobility Policy and the Advisory Committee on the Strategy for the Valorization of Organic Matter.

Finally, he has been involved on the boards of directors of SWITCH (the Alliance for a green economy), the Hydro-Québec Institute in environment, development and society (now called the EDS Institute), the Quebec Center for environmental law (Centre québécois du droit de l’environnement or CQDE) and the group Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS).

Learn more about the Greater Montreal Climate Fund.

Melina Scholefield: Executive Director, Metro Vancouver Zero Emissions Innovation Centre

Vancouver has always been at the fore in protecting and preserving the environment. In early 2022, it embarked on a new chapter with the official launch of the Metro Vancouver Zero Emissions Innovation Centre. More commonly known as the ZEIC, seeded by a $21.7 million endowment from the federal government, the Centre is an independent, not-for-profit organization that will accelerate and scale climate action innovation across the Metro Vancouver region.

The Centre’s mission is purpose-built: “to advance policy innovation, facilitate capacity building and collaboration, and catalyse market investments to accelerate zero emissions innovation in collaboration with local governments.”

Leading the ZEIC is Melina Scholefield. No stranger to advancing green initiatives, Melina joined the Centre as its first executive director after working in municipal government with the City of Vancouver for more than a decade. As Manager, Green Infrastructure Implementation, Melina and her team spearheaded an ambitious, cross-departmental green rainwater infrastructure and urban rainwater management initiative known as the Rain City Strategy. She also advanced key City sustainability goals under its bold Greenest City 2020 initiative, including championing urban climate protection, renewable energy, climate change adaptation and green-building programs. Beyond city government, Melina worked in the private sector as a green infrastructure instructor, a green building project consultant and a Built Green-certified residential builder focused on passive house design and construction methods. In 2020, she was named Water Steward of the Year by the Canadian Water and Wastewater Association for her leadership and impact in the Canadian Water industry. In 2021, she received the YWCA Women of Distinction Award in Environmental Sustainability.

As a champion of green initiatives and sustainability, Melina is excited to be leading the ZEIC — an organization she views as vital to Vancouver and the region’s future.

“Going forward, in the years and decades ahead, the ZEIC will play a vital role in shaping how the city and the region mitigate the impact of climate change. This role is clearly set out in the Centre’s vision, ‘of achieving zero emissions by 2050 through mass, transformation innovations in buildings, transportation, energy supply and other GHG-intensive sectors.’”

On a personal note, Melina is thrilled to be working directly with the ZEIC’s founding supporters in British Columbia — the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue and Simon Fraser University (SFU), the City of Vancouver, Metro Vancouver, and the Province of British Columbia. Beyond BC, that support network extends to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and the six existing members of the greater LC3 Network in Calgary, Edmonton, the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, the Halifax Region, the Montreal Metropolitan Community and Ottawa.

“Meaningful change only happens when there is true collaboration,” says Melina. “As we ramp up our activities, we have trusted partners in British Columbia and across the country that will be partners in our journey to create renewable cities in the Metro Vancouver region.

Mike Mellross: Advancing climate action in the Prairies
Headshot of Mike Mellross. Courtesy of Mike Mellross.

As the new Program Director for the Climate Innovation Fund (CIF), Mike Mellross recognizes that Alberta’s Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) Centres will have some interesting challenges to overcome and opportunities to nurture in the near future.

“We are grateful for the hard work of the people in the oil and gas industry who have provided many benefits for Alberta and Canada,” he says. “We know we are builders and have so many capacities for innovation. So, we need to support our economy’s transformation and help achieve the deep emissions targets that will lead us to a low carbon future. Leaders in all sectors are very willing to look at new business models and new energy systems, and work towards carbon neutrality as a goal. It's all about how we get there together!”

Hosted by the Alberta Ecotrust Foundation (AEF), CIF’s endowments from the federal government support two Centres: one in Calgary and one in Edmonton. Though working under one banner, each Centre will focus on the unique challenges and opportunities of their respective city, and will have their own distinct funds, grant program, projects, initiatives, and more. They join the other LC3 Centres in the network, led by five other organizations in cities across the country and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

“CIF is ambitious!” says Mellross. “I think it will be critical to take our lead from the cities themselves. They have developed robust local climate plans with frameworks and pathways for success. The LC3 network is a great platform for sharing best practices and ideas – we are all very supportive [and excited about] doing that.”

Mellross is excited to build on the operational strengths of AEF, and of an already active climate action ecosystem in Alberta. “We must be very catalytic in our actions,” he says about his future plans to foster innovative climate action in both cities. “We need to look for opportunities that are going to leapfrog rather than base our solutions on incremental [progress]. Solutions that are equally beneficial to the environment, the economy, and the people in our communities.”

Over his 30-year career, Mellross has worked for various private enterprises, with a focus on consulting, engineering, and wildlife management.

He has also worked for the City of Edmonton where he initiated the procurement plan to purchase 100% green electricity for all city operations, managed the City’s climate change office, as well as developed the energy transition strategy and renewable energy programs.

Alberta Ecotrust Foundation is guided by a vision of healthy ecosystems for all Albertans. Our mission is to inspire and mobilize those who champion and protect the environment. Through grantmaking, coordinated action and tireless collaboration, Alberta Ecotrust activates our shared sense of responsibility to cultivate a healthier society and natural environment.

Photo courtesy of Alberta Ecotrust Foundation.

New Halifax Climate Investment, Innovation and Impact (HCi3) Fund leader coming soon

Steve Winkelman: Diversity and inclusion should be central to climate change policy
Headshot of Steve Winkelman. Photo credit: Tim Chin

As the new Executive Director of the Ottawa Climate Action Fund (OCAF) – Ottawa’s Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) Centre – Steve Winkelman is looking forward to bridging silos across sectors, agencies and organizations to advance holistic, lasting solutions in the Nation’s capital.

Working to accelerate Ottawa’s transition to an equitable, carbon-neutral future, the Fund is being incubated by the Ottawa Community Foundation, a charitable non-profit organization working to drive positive, systemic, and sustainable change in multiple areas, including housing, education, food security, as well as environmental and other social issues.

“LC3 presents a huge opportunity considering what the Ottawa Community Foundation (OCF) already does in our community,” says Winkelman who has 30 years of experience in supporting senior government officials across the globe on climate change policy, projects and finance, sustainable transportation, urban planning, clean energy, and clean air. “We can complement and leverage each other’s efforts and resources and bring the conversation to other investors and actors. It's a great platform.”

He is also excited about tapping into the LC3 network and the committed climate action leaders across Canada. “I'm hoping that OCAF’s model of partnerships with the philanthropic, private and public sectors can be shared across LC3, including advancing synergies among housing, transport, land use, and environmental policies,” he says.

Winkelman adds that members of the Network have already started sharing best practices. “If we each copy a really successful program from another Centre, we are going to make good progress, and since the whole LC3 program is being supported by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the opportunities for learning and alignment are huge,” he says. “The real challenge and opportunity will be to determine how we scale up the important work of implementing and replicating things at the project level. When do we start to affect markets, institutions and systems? We must pursue our bold long-term vision while generating tangible, short-term benefits.”

Diversity and equity will play an important role in this work. “In the context of working within a community foundation, we have identified the need for improved collaborative capacity among leaders in climate change and leaders in social inclusion,” he explains. “These communities do not necessarily know each other that well. The pandemic has highlighted many fault lines in our society, including racial discrimination, and unequal access to resources and services. The climate emergency requires an all-hands-on-deck approach. That means that everyone is at the table, working together to shape the low-carbon solutions that all community groups will benefit from.”

The Ottawa Climate Action Fund (OCAF) is a program being incubated by the Ottawa Community Foundation (OCF), a philanthropic organization that works with donors and the community at large to bring about positive, systemic, and sustainable change. The Foundation continues to build on its astute financial management, high-quality donor services, strategic grantmaking and innovative partnerships.

Image courtesy of Tim Chin. 

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Funding update

GMF remains committed to helping municipalities and their partners plan and deliver impactful community building projects. Funding for municipally-owned buildings is now available through GMF’s Sustainable Municipal Buildings (SMB) offer. This transition will provide municipalities and their partners with a clear, streamlined path to fund retrofits and new construction projects for municipally-owned buildings (i.e. town halls, indoor swimming pools, libraries, emergency centres, etc.).

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:

Single building: Grant for a maximum of $65,000 to cover up to 80% of eligible costs.

Portfolio of buildings: Grant for a maximum of $200,000 to cover up to 80% of eligible costs (maximum grant per building cannot exceed $65,000).

 

Open To:

All Canadian municipal governments (with the exception of Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) namesake municipalities; Municipal government project partners.

 

Application Deadline:

Applications are accepted year round, though this offer will close when all funding has been allocated.

 

Eligible Costs:

See the application guide for a list of eligible costs.


NOTE:
If your project involves a building conversion or addition, your project might be considered a new building OR a retrofit and would require further consideration by GMF. Please contact GMF for clarification: gmfinfo@fcm.ca

Apply for funding to make energy efficiency part of the long-term vision for your community’s recreational and cultural spaces.

Plan for near- and long-term capital projects that cut energy use and greenhouse gas emissions—reducing total cost of ownership over the building’s life and freeing up municipal budget room for essential services. Studies will explore practical upgrades that extend asset life, lower operating costs, and help modernize community spaces to be more comfortable, resilient and sustainable for the future.

Eligible projects can focus on a single community building or take a portfolio approach—saving staff time and resources by submitting one funding application for multiple buildings. A portfolio can include: 

  • multiple community buildings within the same municipality  
  • one or more community buildings combined with other municipal buildings in the same municipality  
  • similar types of community buildings across multiple municipalities (subject to GMF review) 

Please note: The guides for applying to this study grant have recently been updated. Ensure you download the latest versions to access the most current information.

Application guideGreen Buildings Pathway guide

What is a Green Buildings Pathway?

A sequence of GHG reduction measures that allow local recreational and cultural facilities to achieve 50% GHG reductions within 10 years and achieve best practice energy targets within 20 years.

This grant enables the identification of measures to be addressed in a Green Buildings Pathway retrofit capital project. Studies will consider the unique objectives and constraints of the building owner (e.g., building condition, capital budgets, equipment renewal cycles, etc.), and provide a detailed exploration of multiple optimization scenarios.

Best practice energy targets

For the retrofit of community buildings, the best practice energy targets are based on the following energy use and fossil-fuel phase-out requirements.

  • For office and office-like buildings (including but not limited to libraries), the Energy Use Intensity (EUI) requirement for building energy consumed per year, per unit floor area, must be met and measured in kWh/m2/y. To determine the EUI requirement, see the Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document.  
  • Thermal Energy Demand Intensity (TEDI) – calculate and report only. Projects are not required to meet a TEDI target for any building type. However, TEDI must be calculated for all projects by an energy modelling professional.
  • Renewable measures (such as installation of solar panels) are permitted, but the project must meet the EUI targets without factoring in any net energy use reductions from renewable systems. However, GHG reductions from renewable energy installations can be counted toward meeting the 50 percent GHG reduction target over 10 years.
  • For non-office buildings (including but not limited to recreation centres, pools and arenas), the building must achieve 25% energy savings compared to the National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) 2020 baseline.
  • Other mandatory requirements, as described in the Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document.
  • For all building types in climate zones 4 and 5, a complete fossil-fuel phase-out is required. Backup fossil-fuel use is not permitted.
  • For all building types in climate zones 6 and above, a complete fossil-fuel phase-out is required when outdoor temperatures are -15 C and above. Backup fossil-fuel space heating is allowed only when outdoor temperatures are below -15 C.

Please read our technical guide before submitting your application.

Eligible buildings

To be eligible for this grant, projects must include at least one community building that is owned by a municipality or not-for-profit organization.

A community building is an enclosed public place or an enclosed workplace that is:

  • owned by a municipal government or not-for-profit
  • primarily used for the purposes of providing athletic, recreational, culture and community programs or services to the local community
  • widely accessible to everyone offering services designed to enhance the health and well-being, skills development, and economic development of individuals and communities

Community buildings include:

  • indoor ice rinks, indoor sports arenas, indoor swimming pools
  • community and recreational centres (e.g., community centres, clubhouses, seniors’ centres and clubs, recreation centres, gyms, halls, and curling rinks)
  • arts and culture facilities (cultural facilities, performing arts facilities, art galleries, and auditoriums)
  • libraries
  • multi-purpose buildings, which include one or more of the above community functions as well as other services/administrative functions

For full project scope and eligibility, please read our application guide.

Notes

Only one grant is eligible per municipality, regardless of whether the included building (or buildings) are owned by the municipality or a not-for-profit.   

Funding is subject to availability. We reserve the right to make changes to eligibility criteria and the types of projects funded through this offer.


How to Apply

  1. Download and review the application guide.
  2. Review the eligibility criteria and required document sections.
  3. Reach out to a GMF representative to discuss your project at gmfinfo@fcm.ca or 1-877-417-0550.  
  4. Visit the FCM funding portal. Follow the portal instructions to prepare and submit your application.
  5. Eligible projects will be invited to submit a full application.

SIGN UP, LEARN MORE, STAY UP TO DATE

Sign up to Connect and stay up to date with GMF news and the latest resources, e-courses and funding opportunities.

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Funding update

GMF remains committed to helping municipalities and their partners plan and deliver impactful community building projects. Funding for municipally-owned buildings is now available through GMF’s Sustainable Municipal Buildings (SMB) offer. This transition will provide municipalities and their partners with a clear, streamlined path to fund retrofits and new construction projects for municipally-owned buildings (i.e. town halls, indoor swimming pools, libraries, emergency centres, etc.).

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$10,000,000

Maximum of $10 million per project. Up to 25% as a grant and the remainder as a loan. Combined loan and grant for up to 80% of eligible project costs.

 

Open To:

All Canadian municipal governments (with the exception of Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) namesake municipalities; Municipal government project partners.

 

Application Deadline:

Applications are accepted year round, though this offer will close when all funding has been allocated.

 

Eligible Costs:

See the application guide for a list of eligible costs.


NOTE:
If your project involves a building conversion or addition, your project might be considered a new building OR a retrofit and would require further consideration by GMF. Please contact GMF for clarification: gmfinfo@fcm.ca

Apply for funding to undertake retrofits that reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30% compared to baseline levels—modernizing infrastructure, extending building life and cutting long-term operating costs. These savings help free up municipal budgets for essential services and improve overall quality of life.

Eligible projects can focus on a single community building or take a portfolio approach—saving staff time and resources by submitting one funding application for multiple buildings. A portfolio can include:

  • multiple community buildings within the same municipality  
  • one or more community buildings combined with other municipal buildings in the same municipality  
  • similar types of community buildings across multiple municipalities (subject to GMF review) 

Application guide

What is the required GHG impact?

Projects must aim to achieve a minimum 30 percent GHG reduction from current or baseline performance. Eligible projects may be a single building retrofit, or a portfolio of buildings (across a single municipality or group of municipalities). 

Read our application guide for full details.

Eligible buildings

To be eligible for this grant, projects must include at least one community building that is owned by a municipality or not-for-profit organization.

A community building is an enclosed public place or an enclosed workplace that is:

  • owned by a municipal government or not-for-profit
  • primarily used for the purposes of providing athletic, recreational, culture and community programs or services to the local community
  • widely accessible to everyone offering services designed to enhance the health and well-being, skills development, and economic development of individuals and communities

Community buildings include:

  • indoor ice rinks, indoor sports arenas, indoor swimming pools
  • community and recreational centres (e.g., community centres, clubhouses, seniors’ centres and clubs, recreation centres, gyms, halls, curling rinks)
  • arts and culture facilities (cultural facilities, performing arts facilities, art galleries, and auditoriums)
  • libraries
  • multi-purpose buildings which include one or more of the above community functions as well as other services/administrative functions

For full project scope and eligibility, please read our application guide.

Notes

CBR only provides funding for one type of capital project per municipality. In addition, only one GHG impact retrofit project is eligible per municipality, regardless of whether the included building (or buildings) are owned by the municipality or a not-for-profit organization.

Funding is subject to availability. We reserve the right to make changes to eligibility criteria and the types of projects funded through this offer.


How to Apply

  1. Download and review the application guide.
  2. Review the eligibility criteria and required document sections.
  3. Reach out to a GMF representative to discuss your project at gmfinfo@fcm.ca or 1-877-417-0550.  
  4. Visit the FCM funding portal. Follow the portal instructions to prepare and submit your application.
  5. Eligible projects will be invited to submit a full application.
Are you seeking guidance to you get the most of your CBR initiative?

GMF now offers a new CBR Advisory Service and is intended to help municipalities maximize the potential of their CBR project by matching them to industry leaders who understand best practices in energy retrofits of community buildings and who can help municipalities achieve their energy goals.

Learn more here.

SIGN UP, LEARN MORE, STAY UP TO DATE

Sign up to Connect and stay up to date with GMF news and the latest resources, e-courses and funding opportunities.

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Funding update

GMF remains committed to helping municipalities and their partners plan and deliver impactful community building projects. Funding for municipally-owned buildings is now available through GMF’s Sustainable Municipal Buildings (SMB) offer. This transition will provide municipalities and their partners with a clear, streamlined path to fund retrofits and new construction projects for municipally-owned buildings (i.e. town halls, indoor swimming pools, libraries, emergency centres, etc.).

Funding Snapshot

Maximum Award:
$10,000,000

Maximum of $10 million per project. Up to 25% as a grant and the remainder as a loan. Combined loan and grant for up to 80% of eligible project costs.

 

Open To:

All Canadian municipal governments (with the exception of Low Carbon Cities Canada (LC3) namesake municipalities; Municipal government project partners.

 

Application Deadline:

Applications are accepted year round, though this offer will close when all funding has been allocated.

 

Eligible Costs:

See the application guide for a list of eligible costs.


NOTE:
If your project involves a building conversion or addition, your project might be considered a new building OR a retrofit and would require further consideration by GMF. Please contact GMF for clarification: gmfinfo@fcm.ca

Apply for funding for multi-measure, long-term projects that reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions over time—modernizing your community buildings, lowering operating costs and freeing up resources for essential services. These retrofits will contribute to a Green Buildings Pathway while enhancing comfort, resilience and quality of life for your community.

Eligible projects can focus on a single community building or take a portfolio approach—saving staff time and resources by submitting one funding application for multiple buildings. A portfolio can include:

  • multiple community buildings within the same municipality  
  • one or more community buildings combined with other municipal buildings in the same municipality  
  • similar types of community buildings across multiple municipalities (subject to GMF review) 

Please note: The guides for applying to this grant have recently been updated. Ensure you download the latest versions to access the most current information.

Application guideGreen Buildings Pathway guide

What is a Green Buildings Pathway?

A sequence of GHG reduction measures that allow local recreational and cultural facilities to achieve 50% GHG reductions within 10 years and achieve best practice energy targets within 20 years. Green Building Pathway capital projects are conducted in phases towards near-net zero, supported by an ongoing strategy to ensure existing equipment and systems operate optimally. An example of the pathway could include: 

  • Phase 1: Improvements are made to a community building envelope that also address critical building upgrades (e.g., insulation, energy efficient windows, etc.) in year 1
  • Phase 2: Focus on high rate-of-return GHG reduction measures in years 5 – 6, such as the addition of solar PV depending on the province.
  • Phase 3: HVAC system is replaced at end-of-life in year 10

This is just one example of a Green Buildings Pathway. Each pathway will reflect unique objectives, constraints and preferred measures. Funding applications must consist of at least one phase in support of a Green Buildings Pathway. Funding recipients may then re-apply in the future for further Green Buildings Pathway retrofit capital project funding for subsequent phases subject to funding availability. 

Best practice energy targets

For the retrofit of community buildings, the best practice energy targets are based on the following energy use and fossil-fuel phase-out requirements.

  • For office and office-like buildings (including but not limited to libraries), the Energy Use Intensity (EUI) requirement for building energy consumed per year, per unit floor area, must be met and measured in kWh/m2/y. To determine the EUI requirement, see the Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document.  
  • Thermal Energy Demand Intensity (TEDI) – calculate and report only. Projects are not required to meet a TEDI target for any building type. However, TEDI must be calculated for all projects by an energy modelling professional.
  • Renewable measures (such as installation of solar panels) are permitted, but the project must meet the EUI targets without factoring in any net energy use reductions from renewable systems. However, GHG reductions from renewable energy installations can be counted toward meeting the 50 percent GHG reduction target over 10 years.
  • For non-office buildings (including but not limited to recreation centres, pools and arenas), the building must achieve 25% energy savings compared to the National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) 2020 baseline.
  • Other mandatory requirements, as described in the Green Buildings Pathway Guidance Document.
  • For all building types in climate zones 4 and 5, a complete fossil-fuel phase-out is required. Backup fossil-fuel use is not permitted.
  • For all building types in climate zones 6 and above, a complete fossil-fuel phase-out is required when outdoor temperatures are -15 C and above. Backup fossil-fuel space heating is allowed only when outdoor temperatures are below -15 C.

Please read our technical guide before submitting your application.

Eligible buildings

To be eligible for this combined loan and grant, projects must include at least one community building that is owned by a municipality or not-for-profit organization.

A community building is an enclosed public place or an enclosed workplace that is:

  • owned by a municipal government or not-for-profit;
  • primarily used for the purposes of providing athletic, recreational, culture and community programs or services to the local community;
  • widely accessible to everyone offering services designed to enhance the health and well-being, skills development, and economic development of individuals and communities.

Community buildings include:

  • indoor ice rinks, indoor sports arenas, indoor swimming pools,
  • community and recreational centres (e.g., community centres, clubhouses, seniors’ centres and clubs, recreation centres, gyms, halls, and curling rinks),
  • arts and culture facilities (cultural facilities, performing arts facilities, art galleries, and auditoriums),
  • libraries, and
  • multi-purpose buildings which include one or more of the above community functions as well as other services/administrative functions.

For full project scope and eligibility, please read our application guide.

Prerequisites

Capital projects must be supported by a Green Buildings Pathway feasibility study or an equivalent feasibility study. Capital projects must consist of GHG and energy reduction measures sequenced in alignment with the Green Buildings Pathway. Read our application guide for full details.

Notes

There is no limit on Green Buildings Pathway capital projects supported per municipality provided they are all part of the same Green Buildings Pathway. Only one type of capital project, Green Buildings Pathway or GHG reduction impact, is eligible per municipality regardless of whether the building or buildings are owned by the municipality or a not-for-profit organization.

Funding is subject to availability. We reserve the right to make changes to eligibility criteria and the types of projects funded through this offer.


How to Apply

  1. Download and review the application guide.
  2. Review the eligibility criteria and required document sections.
  3. Reach out to a GMF representative to discuss your project at gmfinfo@fcm.ca or 1-877-417-0550.  
  4. Visit the FCM funding portal. Follow the portal instructions to prepare and submit your application.
  5. Eligible projects will be invited to submit a full application.

SIGN UP, LEARN MORE, STAY UP TO DATE

Sign up to Connect and stay up to date with GMF news and the latest resources, e-courses and funding opportunities.

Need help to see if this is the right funding for you?

Contact our Outreach team who can answer any questions you have relating to this funding opportunity.

Discover the members of the Peer-to-Peer Network

On July 20, 2022, the CCRI announced the 15 local governments and communities selected to participate in their new Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Network. Located from Squamish, British Columbia, to Haute-Yamaska and Granby, Quebec, members of this Network have direct access to leading experts in the field and connect with local governments and communities across the country, develop their own circular economy roadmaps for their local regions, and much more. Learn more about the participants and the P2P Network today.

Local communities have a unique role to play in accelerating the transition to a circular economy. Cities and regions are leading the way in this transition, acting as hubs for innovation and culture, and engines of economic activity.

The Circular Cities & Regions Initiative (CCRI) aims to advance circular economy knowledge sharing and capacity building in Canadian cities and communities of all sizes. This one-year pilot was created and developed by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Green Municipal Fund (GMF), the National Zero Waste Council, the Recycling Council of Alberta and RECYC-QUÉBEC.

Through direct support, locally focused guidance tailored to their needs, and access to a peer network that encourages and fosters collaboration amongst participants, those taking part in CCRI have the opportunity to:

  • learn how to get started and to embed circular economy approaches in their respective communities;
  • access one-on-one mentoring and workshops offered by circular economy experts in Canada and worldwide, to support and advise on the development of their local circular economy roadmap; 
  • identify benefits to the members of their communities, challenges to overcome and opportunities during this transition;
  • collect lessons learned and best practices to support the future transition of other cities and regions to a circular economy;
  • access monthly peer-to-peer (P2P) workshops that bring together participating communities to exchange ideas with peers across the country, while embarking on their own unique circular economy journey.

Want to learn more about circular economy?

Interested in learning more about how the circular economy can come to life in cities and regions? Review the CCRI webinar recordings featuring speakers from leading organizations and global cities. Webinars are delivered in English with French simultaneous interpretation. Watch the recordings today.

For more information on CCRI, please visit canadiancircularcities.ca

Still have questions?

For more information about CCRI and the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Network, please contact info@canadiancircularcities.ca.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

GMF’s Municipal Energy Roadmap meets you where you’re at – and helps you get where you want to go. 

The report offers timely and specific guidance in identifying the best solutions for Canadian communities to achieve significant GHG emissions reductions in their municipal and community buildings and meet their long-term sustainability objectives. It supports working with residents, businesses and other stakeholders to create jobs, lead economic recovery, lower emissions and significantly improve quality of life.

GMF Municipal Energy Roadmap

No matter where you are in the process, the Energy Roadmap provides practical advice you can use to make the right decision for your community.

Read the report and learn about the solutions that are best-suited to your municipality.

GMF’s Municipal Energy Roadmap helps you:

  • Recognize the most critical and impactful solutions for reducing GHG emissions in municipal and community buildings, including homes, office buildings and municipal arenas.
  • Discover technologies and strategies that lower the costs of projects, and keep energy dollars and jobs in the community.
  • Increase your understanding of the business case and key considerations for implementation.
  • Find municipal examples, funding opportunities, and resources to help bring sustainable energy projects to life.
  • Prioritize your municipality’s efforts and find local solutions you can implement today.

For targeted solutions and strategies to achieve your sustainability goals, read our factsheets

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

To inform planning for future urban development and climate change adaptation, the City of Saskatoon completed a pilot project to assign measurable value to its natural assets. The Natural Capital Asset Valuation pilot project generated an inventory of local natural assets, identified the specific ecosystem services they provide and assigned financial value to those services. The project, which received funding from the Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program (MCIP), provided valuable information for the management of Saskatoon’s natural assets.

Read this case study to understand how assigning measurable value to natural assets can inform municipal strategies for asset management and climate change.

Key success factors

  • The project raised awareness and increased appreciation of the ecosystem services provided by natural assets.
  • The evolution of the project was an example of successful adaptive management: with the departure of a key staff member and other challenges to achieving the original project scope, the team refocused the project to a more manageable scope.
  • Getting started on a new aspect of asset management, even when a municipality is not ready to complete an ambitious set of goals, can yield tangible progress, generate valuable knowledge and lay the groundwork for next steps.

What was the aim of the project?

A municipality’s green infrastructure—the water, soil, plants and animals that provide various services to residents—is largely made up of its natural assets, or natural capital. Within Saskatoon’s city limits are more than 1,400 wetlands, a portion of the South Saskatchewan River, grasslands and forest or shrublands. These natural assets provide important services to the community but have not traditionally been recognized for their value. As a result, they may not be included in municipal strategies for asset management or managing climate change risks.

The City of Saskatoon needed a way to assign measurable value to its natural assets, enabling planning for future development and for climate change impacts. The city tackled the Natural Capital Asset Valuation pilot project to evaluate the ecosystem services provided by the city’s natural assets and measure their financial value. Through the pilot project, the city set out to develop an accounting and reporting framework, create an inventory of natural assets, assess their vulnerability and complete a valuation.

What steps were involved in the project?

The pilot project had three phases, completed by municipal staff with assistance and input from internal and external subject matter experts. While the municipality had originally intended to use accounting metrics—such as life cycle costing, maintenance costs and replacement costs—to value natural assets, the plan changed due to the departure of the team member with the expertise to establish those metrics. Staff realized that the accounting framework originally proposed, whose application would have been a first in Canada, was too ambitious. The project was reframed, moving from a detailed accounting framework to a simplified one focusing on ecosystem services.

In the first phase, the city worked with the Meewasin Valley Authority, a non-profit organization, to compile an inventory of natural assets. The project dealt only with natural assets larger than 2.5 ha in size and located within the city limits to keep the project scope manageable and to leverage key existing partnerships within that area. The city chose two natural assets for the initial detailed valuation portion of the project: the Small Swale, a glacial channel scar that connects to the South Saskatchewan River and includes a native grassland and wetland, and the Richard St. Barbe Baker Afforestation Area, which consists of wetlands, native grasslands and forest. The two assets included a representative mix of habitat types, have been studied previously and have been discussed often in council in relation to ecosystem vulnerabilities and nearby development.

The second phase involved identifying the specific ecosystem services that would be used for the valuation of the two chosen natural assets. To do this, the city drew guidance from a number of sources, including the framework set out by the United Nations in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity initiative and discussions with subject matter experts. An advisory committee with internal and external stakeholders helped to identify ecosystem services, collect data and review the final report. In this phase, the city—through an extensive consultation process—also completed a vulnerability assessment to determine the climate change risks facing the natural assets in its inventory.

In the third phase, the city used the value transfer method to assign value to the ecosystem services identified. This involved reviewing literature and consulting with a diverse group of subject matter experts to find values established for similar ecosystems in other studies. The priority was to first use any values already established within Saskatchewan; for example, values from Saskatchewan were obtained for nutrient removal and wetland/grassland carbon sequestration. If unavailable at the provincial level, the team then sought data from Canada (e.g. for cultural services) as well as from a global ecosystem service valuation database (e.g. for the supporting services value for wetlands). The city completed a full valuation of the two natural assets selected for this project and extrapolated the results to the other assets in the inventory, calculating average value per hectare.

 Aerial map of Saskatoon’s city limits, broken down into individual neighbourhoods. The grey map features blue, brown, and green areas, representing aquatic assets, grasslands, and forests & shrubbery, respectively. Aquatic assets make up 7% of the map, grasslands make up 5%, and forests shrubbery make up 2%.

What was achieved?

A core benefit of the project was increased awareness and appreciation of ecosystem services as well as greater understanding of the knowledge gaps that must be addressed to properly value and manage Saskatoon’s natural assets.

The work yielded a number of technical and operational findings, such as the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) stored in the soil and biomass of the city’s natural assets, the recreational services provided by key natural assets and the identification of at-risk areas to be prioritized for asset management planning.

The city was able to assess the annual financial value of the ecosystem services generated by the two assets evaluated in the pilot, as well as their habitat value in financial terms. The project also roughly estimated the total annual value of the natural assets in the city’s inventory: $48.2 million per year.

Overall, the project was the first step toward the implementation of a valuation system for the city’s natural assets. The natural asset inventory completed for the project established a baseline for the ongoing identification of significant natural assets within city limits. Although it wasn’t possible to set up a full valuation framework using accounting metrics, the project increased the city’s knowledge and expertise enough to enable a high-level cost-benefit analysis for managing natural assets.

Insight and lessons learned

  • There is value in getting started, even when circumstances are not ideal: Although the city did not have all the data or expertise needed, the process of creating the inventory and completing the pilot valuation laid the groundwork for further progress.
  • The use that will be made of project outputs should inform the choice of project methodology: In the end, the simpler method the city adopted yielded results that were at the right level of detail for this initial step.
  • Lack of federal accounting standards can limit the ability to value natural assets, depending on internal municipal capacity and readiness: Natural assets are not yet a reporting requirement under Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) standards. Without PSAB guidance, it can be difficult for Canadian municipalities to establish consistent standards for financially valuing natural assets. This posed a challenge for the City of Saskatoon (where buy-in was not universal across the corporation) and contributed to the decision to use the value transfer method.
  • When assigning numerical value to ecosystem services, it’s important to include the caveat that the numbers are not complete: The project team faced information gaps and the challenge of extrapolating values from other studies—and ultimately knew that all the values established were just estimates and that the totals were under-valued.
  • Stakeholders and experts should be involved as much as possible from the beginning: Input from internal and external subject matter experts and stakeholders with different views on ecosystem services (including cultural services) helped define and value those services.
  • Time constraints and limited data may impact the level of detail that is achievable: The short time frame for completing phases two and three of the project, and the limited data available on some of the services provided by the natural assets, contributed to the city’s decision to transfer values from other studies of similar areas rather than establish its own method for calculating the value of natural assets.
  • Staff turnover and departmental silos can impact project scope: The scope of the project had to be altered following the departure of a key staff member. Departmental silos and varying states of readiness also limited the city’s capacity to assemble a multidisciplinary team with the full range of expertise (as well as a centralised data bank) needed to complete the project as planned.
  • Learning from other municipalities contributes to success: Knowledge shared by other municipalities, through publications and a webinar hosted by the Municipal Natural Asset Initiative, helped staff define and scope the city’s natural assets.

"You can’t always wait for every piece of information to be in place before you start. The main thing is to get started and keep the ball rolling, while identifying gaps along the way."

– Twyla Yobb, Watershed Protection Manager, City of Saskatoon

Next steps

Incorporating accounting metrics into natural asset valuation is a longer-term goal that is linked to the development of national standards through the Public Sector Accounting Board. Until such a time, the City of Saskatoon is moving ahead with building its knowledge about ecosystem services and taking steps to incorporate the valuation into the management of natural assets.

The city’s Corporate Asset Management Plan (2019) and the Green Infrastructure Strategy (2020) are the main documents through which the team will further its work on natural assets. Under these strategies, city staff will request funding in 2022 to develop management plans for natural assets—although COVID-19 may affect the availability of funding.

The recognition of natural capital is also influencing changes to the land use designation process, and the natural asset inventory will be used to inform future city Sector Plan amendments. The inventory will identify natural assets that the city may wish to conserve and will provide preliminary boundaries for consideration in the planning process. 

The city has been working with Meewasin Valley Authority, which maintains the riverbanks of the South Saskatchewan River, to explore how to move forward with management of the natural assets in the inventory.

By the numbers

Green piggy bank

$125,000

MCIP grant

Green topographical map

3461 hectares 

size of Saskatoon’s main natural assets

Green Calendar icon

2017-2020

from initiation to completion

Green hand holding a sapling

2

assets chosen for the detailed valuation

Green XY chart showing upwards growth.

$48.2 million/year

total value of ecosystem services

Green leaf

137,000 t CO2e

stored by the two pilot assets

Related resources

City of Saskatoon’s Natural Capital Asset Valuation Pilot Project

Contact

Twyla Yobb
Watershed Protection Manager, City of Saskatoon
twyla.yobb@saskatoon.ca

This project was part of the Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program (MCIP), a five-year, $75 million program funded by Infrastructure Canada and delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM).

Want to explore all GMF-funded projects? Check out the Projects Database for a complete overview of funded projects and get inspired by municipalities of all sizes, across Canada.

Visit the projects database

GMF's Brownfield Roadmaps provide a detailed overview of the process of bringing contaminated or abandoned sites back into productive use in your province or territory.

Developed in close consultation with provincial and territorial governments, each roadmap provides you with an easy-to-follow path through three focus areas:

  • Process: the steps typically followed when redeveloping a brownfield site in Canada
  • Legislation: provincial/territorial laws and policy requirements associated with each step in the process
  • Funding: financial support and incentive programs available to municipalities and their partners

Read our roadmaps to:

  • Know the steps involved in a brownfield redevelopment project and be better prepared to avoid potential delays or cost overruns.
  • Learn where to look for funding, including grants and incentive programs.
  • Structure your discussions and consultations with project stakeholders.
  • Improve your understanding of the brownfields regulatory framework in your province.

2021 Brownfield Roadmaps

Roadmap: Alberta
Roadmap: British Columbia
Roadmap: Manitoba 
Roadmap: New Brunswick
Roadmap: Newfoundland and Labrador
Roadmap: Northwest Territories
Roadmap: Nova Scotia 
Roadmap: Nunavut
Roadmap: Ontario
Roadmap: Prince Edward Island
Roadmap: Quebec
Roadmap: Saskatchewan
Roadmap: Yukon


Note: The information presented in the roadmaps is current to the publication date and may not capture all relevant programs. Please contact the responsible organizations to verify up-to-date information.

Each roadmap summarizes current provincial or territorial legislation and must not be regarded as a formal legal interpretation. Please refer to the identified legislation for complete details on requirements and seek legal advice if necessary.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Energy decisions made easierThe Municipal Energy Roadmap helps identify the best solutions for Canadian communities to achieve significant GHG emissions reductions in their municipal and community buildings and meet their long-term sustainability objectives.

This primer for local elected officials outlines how the Energy Roadmap simplifies planning and makes energy decisions easier. It summarizes how the Energy Roadmap can be used to:

  • Prioritize solutions based on your region, grid type and other factors.
  • Explore workable options with GHG emission and financial impact estimates.
  • Clarify the advantages and challenges of each solution.

The primer also links to additional resources and funding information available to your municipality.

Read the primer.

Did you find this page helpful?
Please offer suggestions that will improve the learning center for you:

Pagination

Subscribe to